Sustainability of Russia’s Regional Budgets When Subjected to Macroeconomic Shocks
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-5-78-103
Abstract
The article examines the effect of growth rates for gross regional product (GRP) and of fluctuations in oil prices and currency exchange on the sustainability of Russia’s regional budgets from 2005 to 2019. Sustainability estimates for various regions are calculated with the sectoral structure of their GRPs taken into account. The hypothesis that the response of the primary budget balance to changes in macroeconomic variables depends upon the amount of a region’s debt is also explored. In order to test that hypothesis, a fiscal reaction function is arrived at using both a two-way fixed effects model and also a dynamic model on panel data. The results demonstrate that regions specializing in agriculture and those with emerging economies exhibit relatively weak fiscal sustainability when sustainability is judged by how the accumulation of debt during the previous period affects the primary budget balance. However, regions with extractive and manufacturing industries, as well as those without obvious specialization, have a significant positive fiscal reaction, which indicates that their budgets are sustainable. The primary budget balance reacts positively to increasing oil prices regardless of the amount of regional debt in any of the regions, except for the regions with emerging economies. The response to changes in the exchange rate (currency depreciation) is negative for all regions on average, while there is no significant response in the primary budget balance to changes in GRP growth rates. The robustness of these results is tested by evaluating alternative specifications for models. The findings of the study can be useful in making recommendations for improving the resilience of regional budgets when faced with external macroeconomic shocks or with the possible development of fiscal rules at the subnational level.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared as part of the RANEPA state-commissioned research program.
About the Authors
A. N. Deryugin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksandr N. Deryugin, Senior Researcher, Laboratory for Budget Policy Studies, Senior Researcher, Center for Intergovernmental Relations
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571
3, str. 2, Nastas,inskiy per., Moscow, 127006
O. V. Suchkova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Suchkova, Research Assistant, Laboratory for Budget Policy Studies, Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Economics
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571
1, str. 46, Leninskie Gory ul., Moscow, 119234
References
1. Ayvazyan S. A., Afanasyev M. Yu., Kudrov A. V. Metod klasterizatsii regionov RF s uchetom otraslevoy struktury VRP [Clustering Methodology by Sectoral Structure of GRP for the Regions of Russian Federation]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 2016, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 24-46. (In Russ.)
2. Akindinova N., Chernyavsky A., Chepel A. Regional’nye byudzhety v usloviyakh krizisa: mozhno li dostich’ sbalansirovannosti? [Regional Budgets During a Crisis: Is Balance Attainable?]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2016, no. 10, pp. 31-48. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2016-10-31-48. (In Russ.)
3. Alekhin B. I. Byudzhetnaya ustoychivost’ Rossii. Chto pokazal test Bona [Russia’s Fiscal Sustainability. What Bohn’s Test Has Revealed]. Finansovyy zhurnal [Financial Journal], 2019a, no. 5, pp. 21-36. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2019-5-21-36. (In Russ.)
4. Alekhin B. I. O byudzhetnoy ustoychivosti regionov [On the Sustainability of Regional Fiscal Policy]. Vestnik RGGU. Ser.: Economika. Upravlenie. Pravo [RGGU Bulletin. “Economics. Management. Law” Series], 2019b, no. 2, pp. 81-101. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2019-2-81-101. (In Russ.)
5. Klimanov V. V., Mikhaylova A. A. Byudzhetnaya detsentralizatsiya v pandemiyu i post pandemiynykh usloviyakh [Fiscal Decentralization Under Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Conditions]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2021, no. 3(51), pp. 218-226. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2021-51-3-11. (In Russ.)
6. Mastitsky S. E., Shitikov V. K. Statisticheskiy analiz i vizualizatsiya s pomoshch’yu R [Statistical Analysis and Data Visualization with R], 2014. https://github.com/ranalytics/r-tutorials/tree/master/Edition_2014/Book.
7. Mikhaylova A., Timushev E. Byudzhetnaya sistema Rossii: naskol’ko ustoychiva? [Russia’s Budgetary System: How Sustainable Is It?]. Ekonomicheskyy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal], 2020, no. 24(4), pp. 572-597. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8691-2020-24-4-572-597. (In Russ.)
8. Sinelnikov-Murylev S., Kadochnikov P., Trunin I., Chetverikov S., Vigneault M. Problema myagkikh byudzhetnykh ogranicheniy rossiyskykh regional’nykh vlastey [The Problem of Soft Budget Constraints for Russian Regional Governments]. Moscow, Institute for the Economy in Transition, 2006. (In Russ.)
9. Suchkova O. V., Chemis A. Y. Otsenka ustoychivosti gosudarstvennogo dolga regionov Rossii [Estimated Sustainability of Russian Regional Debt]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta im. G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2019, no. 4, pp. 72-84. DOI: 10.21686/2413-2829-2019-4-72-84. (In Russ.)
10. Tabakh A., Andreeva D. Dolgovye strategii rossiyskikh regionov [Debt Strategies of Russian Regions]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2015, no. 10, pp. 78-93. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2015-10-78-93. (In Russ.)
11. Alexeev M., Chih Y.-Y. Energy Price Shocks and Economic Growth in the US: A State-Level Analysis. Energy Economics, 2021, vol. 98(C). DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105242.
12. Bohn H. The Behavior of U.S. Public Debt and Deficit. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 949-963. DOI: 10.1162/003355398555793.
13. Burger P., Stuart I., Jooste C., Cuevas A. Fiscal Sustainability and the Fiscal Reaction Unction for South Africa. IMF Working Paper, no. 11/69, 2011.
14. Checherita-Westphal C., Žďárek V. Fiscal Reaction Function and Fiscal Fatigue: Evidence for the Euro Area. European Central Bank Working Paper, no. 2036, 2017.
15. Ghosh A. R., Kim J., Mendoza E., Ostry J. D., Qureshi M. S. Fiscal Fatigue, Fiscal Space and Debt Sustainability in Advanced Economies. The Economic Journal, 2013, vol. 123, no. 566, pp. F4-F30. DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12010.
16. Wildasin D. E. Externalities and Bailouts: Hard and Soft Budget Constraints in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations. Policy Research Working Papers, no. 1843, 1997. DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-1843.
Review
For citations:
Deryugin A.N., Suchkova O.V. Sustainability of Russia’s Regional Budgets When Subjected to Macroeconomic Shocks. Economic Policy. 2022;17(5):78-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-5-78-103
Views:
89
Email this article 