Impact of Information in Press Releases on the Financial Performance of Russian Companies
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-3-138-157
Abstract
When publishing press releases on earnings, a company can either reliably disclose additional information, or mislead the investor, hiding or, conversely, embellishing the facts. In this study, the authors assess the impact of the press release tone on a company’s financial performance. The empirical base of the study includes quarterly financial indicators of Russian companies as well as semantic, linguistic and substantive features of quarterly press releases (in English and Russian) for 2015–2019. As part of this work, to assess the impact of disclosing a company’s prospects in press releases on its financial results, an authors’ dictionary was created, designed as a library in the R environment; the final list consists of 373 words. The positive and negative coloring of the text in English was assessed by two dictionaries, namely Loughran and McDonald (LM), and Mohammad and Turney (NRC); the assessment of the sentiment of press releases in Russian was assessed by EcSentiThemeLex dictionary for assessing economic and financial texts; and complexity of the text was graded via the Bog Index. Panel regression was used to assess the impact of financial and textual factors on a company’s financial performance. It was found that press releases are getting longer, accompanied by comments from managers and, in general, becoming more meaningful. As far as managers are concerned, domestic managers fairly truthfully consecrate real information about the state of affairs in the company in press releases and do not manipulate information. Investors also trust press releases about the company’s future results, and tend to respond positively to the positive tone of the publications as well as to statements related to the disclosure of the company’s prospects.
About the Authors
Elena A. FedorovaRussian Federation
Elena A. Fedorova, Dr. Sci. (Econ.),
49, Leningradskiy pr., Moscow, 125167.
Nadezhda V. Lapshina
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Lapshina,
11, Pokrovskiy b-r, Moscow, 101000.
Mikhail P. Lazarev
Russian Federation
Mikhail P. Lazarev, Cand. Sci. (Phys. and Math.),
49, Leningradskiy pr., Moscow, 125167.
Alex I. Borodin
Russian Federation
Alex I. Borodin, Dr. Sci. (Econ.),
36, Stremyannyy per., Moscow, 115054.
References
1. Fedorova Ye. A., Afanasyev D. O., Demin I. S., Pyltsin I. V., Nersesyan R. G., Lazarev A. M. Razrabotka tonal’no-tematicheskogo slovarya EcSentiThemeLex dlya analiza ekonomicheskih tekstov na russkom yazyke [Development of a Tonal-Thematic Dictionary EcSentiThemeLex for the Analysis of Economic Texts in Russian]. Prikladnaya informatika [Applied Informatics], 2020, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 58-77. DOI: 10.37791/2687-0649-2020-15-658-77. (In Russ.)
2. Abed S., Al-Najjar B., Roberts C. Measuring Annual Report Narratives Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from Forward-Looking Information in the UK Prior the Financial Crisis. Managerial Auditing Journal, 2016, vol. 31, no. 4-5, pp. 338-361. DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-092014-1101.
3. Arslan-Ayaydin Ö., Boudt K., Thewissen J. Managers Set the Tone: Equity Incentives and the Tone of Earnings Press Releases. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2016, vol. 72(S), pp. S132-S147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.10.007.
4. Bonsall S. B., Bozanic Z., Merkley K. J. Managers’ Use of Forward and Non-Forward-Looking Narratives in Earnings Press Releases. Ohio State University and Cornell University Working Paper, 2015.
5. Boudt K., Thewissen J. Jockeying for Position in CEO Letters: Impression Management and Sentiment Analytics. Financial Management, 2019, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 77-115. DOI: 10.1111/fima.12219.
6. Bozanic Z., Roulstone D. T., Van Buskirk A. Management Earnings Forecasts and Other Forward-Looking Statements. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2018, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.008.
7. Caserio C., Panaro D., Trucco S. Management Discussion and Analysis: A Tone Analysis on US Financial Listed Companies. Management Decision, 2019, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 510-525. DOI: 10.1108/MD-10-2018-1155.
8. Davis A. K., Piger J. M., Sedor L. M. Beyond the Numbers: Measuring the Information Content of Earnings Press Release Language. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2012, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 845-868. DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01130.x.
9. Davis A., Tama-Sweet I. Managers’ Use of Language Across Alternative Disclosure Outlets: Earnings Press Releases Versus MD&A. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2012, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 804-837. DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01125.x.
10. Francis J., Schipper K., Vincent L. Expanded Disclosures and the Increased Usefulness of Earnings Announcements. The Accounting Review, 2002, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 515-546. DOI: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.3.515.
11. Henry E. Are Investors Influenced by How Earnings Press Releases Are Written? Journal of Business Communication, 2008, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 363-407. DOI: 10.1177/0021943608319388.
12. Huang X., Teoh S. H., Zhang Y. Tone Management. The Accounting Review, 2014, vol. 89, pp. 1083-1113. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2024674.
13. Hussainey K., Schleicher T., Walker M. Undertaking Large-Scale Disclosure Studies When AIMR-FAF Ratings Are Not Available: The Case of Prices Leading Earnings. Accounting and Business Research, 2003, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 275-294. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2003.9729654.
14. Li F. Annual Report Readability, Current Earnings, and Earnings Persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2008, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 221-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003.
15. Li F. The Information Content of Forward-Looking Statements in Corporate Filings - A Naïve Bayesian Machine Learning Approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 2010, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1049-1102. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00382.x.
16. Loughran T., Mcdonald B. Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures. The Journal of Finance, 2014, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1643-1671. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1920411.
17. Loughran T., Mcdonald B. Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 2016, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1187-1230. DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12123/
18. Loughran T., McDonald B. When Is a Liability Not a Liability? Textual Analysis, Dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance, 2011, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 35-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.15406261.2010.01625.x.
19. Luo Y., Zhou L. Managerial Ability, Tone of Earnings Announcements, and Market Reaction. Asian Review of Accounting, 2017, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 454-471. DOI: 10.1108/ARA-072016-0078.
20. Matsumoto D., Pronk M., Roelofsen E. What Makes Conference Calls Useful? The Information Content of Managers’ Presentations and Analysts’ Discussion Sessions. The Accounting Review, 2011, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1383-1414. DOI: 10.2308/accr-10034.
21. Mohammad S., Turney P. Emotions Evoked by Common Words and Phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to Create an Emotion Lexicon. Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, 2010, pp. 26 – 34.
22. Muslu V., Radhakrishnan S., Subramanyam K. R., Lim D. Forward-Looking MD&A Disclosures and the Information Environment. Management Science, 2015, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 931-948. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1921.
23. You H., Zhang X. Financial Reporting Complexity and Investor Underreaction to 10-K Information. Review of Accounting Studies, 2009, vol. 14, no. 4. pp. 559-586. DOI: 10.1007/S11142-008-9083-2.
Review
For citations:
Fedorova E.A., Lapshina N.V., Lazarev M.P., Borodin A.I. Impact of Information in Press Releases on the Financial Performance of Russian Companies. Economic Policy. 2021;16(3):138-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-3-138-157