Financial Well-Being of the Population in the Pandemic: The Impact of the Income Support Policy Response in Russia
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-6-70-93
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the quantitative assessment and analysis of changes in income and poverty in the Russian Federation during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to mitigate a certain decline in the financial conditions of households derived from the lockdown shock on the labor market, the federal government adopted a set of income support measures mainly addressed to families with children and officially registered unemployed. The study aims to quantify the impact of these new long-term and short-term cash transfers on average income and poverty rate for the entire population as well as across different categories of households. The two-stage microsimulation modeling is based on the data of the Statistical Survey of Income and Participation in Social Programs, annually conducted by Rosstat. The estimates show that the additional cash transfers accounted for about 15% and 35% mitigation of the decrease in average income and the increase of the poverty rate, respectively, compared to the levels at the start of 2020. It is found that families with children aged between 3 and 7 were likely to benefit most from the support measures, which almost totally prevented the growth of poverty in this category of households. Conversely, the positive impact was minimal for families with children over 7 years and negligibly small for families without children. Informal workers also fell outside the scope of federal anti-crisis social policy tools. So, for these three population categories, the aggravated problems of income reduction and rising poverty remained unresolved. The findings of the study also confirm that the universal and temporary cash transfers are much less effective in income support and curbing the growth of poverty even among recipients.
Keywords
JEL: I38, H53
About the Authors
Alina I. PishnyakRussian Federation
Alina I. PISHNYAK, Cand. Sci. (Sociol.). Institute for Social Policy
20, Myasnitskaya ul., Moscow, 101000
Elena A. Gorina
Russian Federation
Elena A. GORINA, Cand. Sci. (Econ.). Institute for Social Policy
20, Myasnitskaya ul., Moscow, 101000
Irina I. Korchagina
Russian Federation
Irina I. KORCHAGINA, Cand. Sci. (Econ.). Institute for Social Policy
20, Myasnitskaya ul., Moscow, 101000;
32, Nakhimovskiy pr., Moscow, 117218
Sergey A. Ter-Akopov
Russian Federation
Sergey A. TER-AKOPOV
20, Myasnitskaya ul., Moscow, 101000
References
1. Antonova G. V., Mirzabalaeva F. I., Bondarchuk A. G. Transformatsiya portreta bezrabotnogo na registriruemom rynke truda pod vliyaniem institutsional’nykh i ekonomicheskikh faktorov [Transformation of the Portrait of the Unemployed in the Registered Labour Market Under the Influence of Institutional and Economic Factors]. Ekonomika truda [Russian Journal of Labor Economics], 2020, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 693-712. DOI:10.18334/et.7.8.110781. (In Russ.)
2. Grishin V. I., Domashchenko D. V., Konstantinova L. V., Koshkin A. P., Ustyuzhanina E. V., Shtykhno D. A., Shubenkova E. V. Zhizn’ posle pandemii: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye posledstviya [Life After the Pandemic: Economic and Social Consequences]. Vestnik REU im. G. V. Plekhanova [Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics], 2020, vol. 17, no. 3(111), pp. 5-18. DOI:10.21686/2413-2829-2020-3-5-18. (In Russ.)
3. Zharomsky V. S., Rudberg A. M., Soptsov V. V., Ter-Akopov S. A. O zadache kalibrovki i vzveshivaniya dannykh vyborochnykh obsledovaniy bol’shogo ob”ema [On the Issue of Calibrating and Weighting Data from Large-Scale Sample Surveys]. Narodonaselenie [Population], 2011, no. 3(53), pp. 69-83. (In Russ.)
4. Zubarevich N. V. Sotsial’naya geografiya rossiyskogo krizisa [Social Geography of the Russian Сrisis]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World], 2016, no. 5, pp. 5-18. (In Russ.)
5. Karabchuk T. S., Pashinova T. R., Soboleva N. E. Bednost’ domokhozyaystv v Rossii: chto govoryat dannye RMEZ VShE [Poverty of Russian Households: What We Know About It from RLMS Database]. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia], 2013, vol 22, no. 1, pp. 155-175. (In Russ.)
6. Kuznetsova O. Uyazvimost’ struktury regional’nykh ekonomik v krizisnykh usloviyakh [Vulnerability of Regional Economies’ Structure in Crisis Conditions]. Federalizm [Federalism], 2020, no. 2, pp. 20-38. DOI:10.21686/2073-1051-2020-2-20-38. (In Russ.)
7. Ludanik M., Orlova A. Problema ugrozy uvol’neniya na rynke truda Rossii [The Problem of Dismissal Threat on a Labor Market of Russia]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika [Moscow University Economics Bulletin], 2013, no. 1, pp. 56-68. (In Russ.)
8. Lyashok V. Osobennosti udalennoy zanyatosti v marte - iyune 2020 g. v Rossii [Features of Remote Employment in March - June 2020 in Russia]. Monitoring ekonomicheskoy situatsii v Rossii. Tendentsii i vyzovy sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Monitoring of Russia’s Economic Outlook. Trends and Challenges of Socio-Economic Development], 2020, no. 20(122), pp. 36-43. (In Russ.)
9. Maleva T., Grishina E., Burdyak A., Chumakova Yu. Epidemiologicheskiy krizis v pervoy polovine 2020 g.: sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie naseleniya [Epidemiological Crisis in the First Half of 2020: Socio-Economic Situation]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii [Russian Economic Developments], 2020, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 60-72. (In Russ.)
10. Mau V., Kuzminov Ya., Radygin A., Sadovnichiy V., Sinelnikov-Murylev S. (eds.). Obshchestvo i pandemiya: opyt i uroki bor’by s COVID-19 v Rossii [Society and the Pandemic: Experiences and Lessons in Combating COVID-19 in Russia]. Moscow, Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation, 2020. (In Russ.)
11. Bourguignon F., Spadaro A. Microsimulation as a Tool for Evaluating Redistribution Policies. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2006, no. 4, pp. 77-106. DOI:10.1007/s10888-005-9012-6.
Review
For citations:
Pishnyak A.I., Gorina E.A., Korchagina I.I., Ter-Akopov S.A. Financial Well-Being of the Population in the Pandemic: The Impact of the Income Support Policy Response in Russia. Economic Policy. 2021;16(6):70-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-6-70-93