Preview

Economic Policy

Advanced search

How Much Government Debt Is Now Acceptable for Russia?

https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-4-6-33

Abstract

The period of near-zero interest rates is over, and the recent noticeable growth in the debt burden, as well as in the cost of interest payments to service that debt, has made it more challenging for national and global financial regulators to strike a balance between keeping budgetary parameters stable and spurring economic  development.  This  article  proposes  a  “safe”  threshold  for  the  debt  burden  such  that  the  ac-cumulated debt would not diminish prospects for growth and degrade fiscal sustainability. A significant negative linear effect of government debt on GDP growth rates from 1980 to 2021 has been observed for a total sample of 57 countries. According to the Hansen test, there are relatively safe thresholds for high- and middle-income countries at 56% and 24% of GDP, respectively. An assessment of the impact of government debt on the dynamics of interest expense indicates that there is a stable positive relationship between them. The conclusion drawn is that the thresholds beyond which an acceleration in the growth of interest payments would produce an increase in the debt burden stand at 51% and 29% of GDP, respectively, for the same groups of countries. However, the current conditions of unprecedented sanctions that restrict access to foreign borrowing together with a double-digit key interest rate were not taken into account for calculations based on the retrospective data. When those factors are included, the authors’ projections indicate that Russia’s safe level of debt should not exceed 20% of GDP.

About the Authors

I. A. Sokolov
RANEPA; Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy
Russian Federation

Ilya A. Sokolov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Institute of Applied Economic Research; Lead Researcher

82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571

3–5, Gazetnyy per., Moscow, 125993



О. V. Suchkova
RANEPA; Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Оlga V. Suchkova, Researcher, Institute of Applied Economic Research; Senior Lecturer

82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571

1–46, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991



E. V. Repkina
RANEPA
Russian Federation

Elena V. Repkina, Researcher, Institute of Applied Economic Research

82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571



References

1. Afonso A., Jalles J. T. Growth and Productivity: The Role of Government Debt. International Review of Economics & Finance , 2013, vol. 25, pp. 384-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2012.07.004.

2. Amann J., Middleditch P. Revisiting Reinhart and Rogoff After the Crisis: A Time Series Perspective. Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series no. 198, 2015. DOI: 10.1093/cje/bez009.

3. Baum A., Checherita-Westphal C., Rother P. Debt and Growth: New Evidence for the Euro Area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2013, vol. 32, pp. 809-821. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.07.004.

4. Bohn H. The Behavior of US Public Debt and Deficits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 949-963. DOI: 10.1162/003355398555793.

5. Butkus M., Cibulskiene D., Garsviene L., Seputiene J. Empirical Evidence on Factors Conditioning the Turning Point of the Public Debt-Growth Relationship. Economies, 2021, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1-22. DOI: 10.3390/economies9040191.

6. Checherita-Westphal C., Rother P. The Impact of High Government Debt on Economic Growth and Its Channels: An Empirical Investigation for the Euro Area. European Economic Review, 2012, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1392-1405. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.06.007.

7. Chudik A., Mohaddes K., Pesaran H., Raissi M. Is There a Debt-Threshold Effect on Outut Growth? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2017, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 135-150. DOI: 10.5089/9781513513355.001.

8. Claessens S. The Debt Laffer Curve: Some Estimates. World Development , 1990, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1671-1677. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(90)90062-3.

9. Fournier J., Fall F. Limits to Government Debt Sustainability. Paris, OECD Economics Department, Working Papers no. 1229, 2015. DOI: 10.1787/5jrxv0fctk7j-en.

10. Ghosh A. R., Kim J., Mendoza E., Ostry J. D., Qureshi M. S. Fiscal Fatigue, Fiscal Space and Debt Sustainability in Advanced Economies. The Economic Journal, 2013, vol. 123, no. 566, pp. F4-F30. DOI: 10.3386/w16782.

11. Hajdenberg A., Romeu R. Parameter Estimate Uncertainty in Probabilistic Debt Sustainability Analysis. IMF Staff Papers , 2010, vol. 57(1), pp. 61-83. DOI: 10.1057/imfsp.2009.25.

12. Hansen B. E. Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Infe rence. Journal of Econometrics, 1999, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 345-368. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076-(99)00025-1.

13. Herndon T., Ash M., Pollin R. Does High Public Debt Consistently Stifle Economic Growth? A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Cambridge Journal of Economics , 2014, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 257-279. DOI: 10.1093/cje/bet075.

14. Jacobs J., Ogawa K., Sterken E., Tokutsu I. Public Debt, Economic Growth and the Real Interest Rate: A Panel VAR Approach to EU and OECD Countries. Applied Economics, 2020, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1377-1394. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1673301.

15. Law S. H., Ng C. H., Kutan A. M., Law Z. K. Public Debt and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Nonlinearity and Threshold Analysis. Economic Modelling, 2021, vol. 98, pp. 26-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.02.004.

16. Mackiewicz-Lyziak J., Lyziak T. A New Test for Fiscal Sustainability With Endogenous Sovereign Bond Yields: Evidence for EU Economies. Economic Modelling, 2019, vol. 82, pp. 136-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.01.001.

17. Paret A-C. Debt Sustainability in Emerging Market Countries: Some Policy Guidelines From a Fan-Chart Approach. Economic Modelling, 2017, vol. 63(C), pp. 26-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.01.010.

18. Reinhart C. M., Rogoff K. S. Growth in a Time of Debt. American Economic Review , 2010, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 573-578. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.2.573.

19. Woo J., Kumar M. S. Public Debt and Growth. Economica, 2015, vol. 82, no. 328, pp. 705-739. DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12138.


Review

For citations:


Sokolov I.A., Suchkova О.V., Repkina E.V. How Much Government Debt Is Now Acceptable for Russia? Economic Policy. 2024;19(4):6-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-4-6-33

Views: 515


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-5124 (Print)
ISSN 2411-2658 (Online)