The Effect of Spatial Competition on Retail Gasoline Prices
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-2-36-57
Abstract
This paper explores the nature of retail gasoline market competition in the Russian Federation by applying a detailed panel structure database at the level of individual filling stations. This market is a highly concentrated one, which theoretically enables companies to exercise market power. Furthermore, in most of the administrative districts of the Russian Federation, one vertically integrated oil company will dominate; this is often the company located nearest to its own refinery. Spatial econometric analysis has yielded some interesting empirical results concerning how the local market is affected. First, there is no confirmation of the hypothesis that gas stations compete only with the nearest gas stations. Second, there is strong evidence that stations compete with other filling stations located within five kilometers, and the intensity of competition decreases as the distance between stations increases. A relationship between certain characteristics of filling stations and the price behavior of individual filling stations also became evident. These results suggest that retail fuel prices are influenced by such features of filling stations as brand name and services provided. The conclusion is that the brand name of competing stations and even the geographical distribution of these specific brands are more important determinants of the retail price of gasoline than the number of competing stations.
Keywords
petroleum products,
spatial econometrics,
product differentiation,
gas stations,
vertically integrated oil companies
JEL: D12, D22, D43, L1, L13
About the Authors
Dmitriy S. Gordeev
RANEPA; Russian Foreign Trade Academy,
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitriy S. Gordeev, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher at Institute of Applied Economic Research; Researcher at Institute of International Economics and Finance,
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571;
6а, Vorob’evskoe shosse, Moscow, 119285.
Ekaterina A. Galeeva
RANEPA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Galeeva, Junior Researcher at Institute of Applied Economic Research,
a 82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571.
References
1. Vakulenko E. S. Analiz svyazi mezhdu regional’nymi rynkami truda v Rossii s ispol’zovaniem modeli Oukena [Analysis of the Relationship Between Regional Labour Markets in Russia Using Okun’s Model]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 2015, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 28-48. (In Russ.)
2. Gordeev D. S., Galeeva E. A. Povyshenie aktsizov na nefteprodukty - negativnyy effekt dlya byudzheta i ekonomiki [Increase in Excise Tax Rates on Gasoline and Diesel Fuels - A Negative Effect on the Budget and the Economy]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2022, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 126-153. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2022-1-126-153. (In Russ.)
3. Gordeev D. S., Kosukhina E. A. Otsenka kontsentratsii firm v sfere roznichnoy torgovli nefteproduktami v RF [Evaluation of the Concentration of the Gasoline Retail Market in the Russian Federation]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii [Russian Economic Development], 2020, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 52-68. (In Russ.)
4. Demidova O. A., Kamalova E. Prostranstvenno-ekonometricheskoe modelirovanie ekonomicheskogo rosta rossiyskikh regionov: imeyut li znachenie instituty? [Spatial Econometric Modeling of Economic Growth in Russian Regions: Do Institutions Matter?]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2021, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 34-59. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2021-2-34-59. (In Russ.)
5. Idrisov G. I., Litvinova Yu. O. Osnovnye faktory tsen na roznichnom rynke benzina: empiricheskoe issledovanie dlya Sankt-Peterburga [Determinants of Retail Prices for Gasoline: Empirical Evidence for Saint Petersburg]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [HSE Economic Journal], 2015, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 423-456. (In Russ.)
6. Kaukin A. S., Filicheva E. V., Freynkman L. M. Determinanty roznichnykh tsen na nefteprodukty v Rossii [Determinants of Russian Retail Petroleum Prices]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2016, vol. 2, no. 30, pp. 34-59. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2016-30-2-2. (In Russ.)
7. Clemenz G., Gugler K. Locational Choice and Price Competition: Some Empirical Results for the Austrian Retail Gasoline Market. Empirical Economics, 2006, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 291-312. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2070-6_12.
8. D’Aspremont C., Jaskold-Gabszewicz J., Thisse J.-F. On Hotelling’s “Stability in Competition.” Econometrica, 1979, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1145-1150. DOI: 10.2307/1911955.
9. De Palma A., Ginsburgh V., Papageorgiou Y. Y., Thisse J.-F. The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Holds Under Sufficient Heterogeneity. Econometrica, 1985, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 767-781. DOI: 10.2307/1912653.
10. Eaton B. C. Spatial Competition Revisited. The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’Economique, 1972, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 268-278. DOI: 10.2307/133891.
11. Eaton B. С., Lipsey R. The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Reconsidered: Some New Developments in the Theory of Spatial Competition. Review of Economic Studies, 1975, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 27-49. DOI: 10.2307/2296817.
12. Hastings J. S. Vertical Relationships and Competition in Retail Gasoline Markets: Empirical Evidence From Contract Changes in Southern California. American Economic Review, 2004, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 317-328. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.507082.
13. Herfindahl O. C. Concentration in the Steel Industry. New York, NY, Columbia University, 1950.
14. Lee L.-F., Yu J. Some Recent Developments in Spatial Panel Data Models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2010, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 255-271. DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.09.002.
15. Lee S. Y. Bias From Misspecified Spatial Weight Matrices in SAR Models: Theory and Simulation Studies, vol. 6. San Francisco, CA, San Francisco State University, 2009.
16. Lee S. Y. Spatial Competition in the Retail Gasoline Market: An Equilibrium Approach Using SAR Models. Columbus, OH, Ohio State University, 2007.
17. LeSage J., Pace R. K. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton, FL, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2009. DOI: 10.1201/9781420064254.
18. Netz J. S., Taylor B. A. Maximum or Minimum Differentiation? An Empirical Investigation Into the Location of Firms. University Library of Munich, Germany, no. 9812003, 1998. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.141618.
19. Netz J. S., Taylor B. A. Maximum or Minimum Differentiation? Location Patterns of Retail Outlets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 162-175. DOI: 10.1162/003465302317331991.
20. Pinkse J., Slade M. E. Contracting in Space: An Application of Spatial Statistics to DiscreteChoice Models. Journal of Econometrics, 1998, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 125-154. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00097-3.
21. Pinkse J., Slade M. E., Brett C. Spatial Price Competition: A Semiparametric Approach. Econometrica, 2002, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1111-1153. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00320.
22. Van Meerbeeck W. Competition and Local Market Conditions on the Belgian Retail Gasoline Market. De Economist, 2003, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 369-388. DOI: 10.1023/B:ECOT.0000006590.66223.9a.
Review
For citations:
Gordeev D.S., Galeeva E.A. The Effect of Spatial Competition on Retail Gasoline Prices. Economic Policy. 2024;19(2):36-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-2-36-57
Views:
145
Email this article 