Having Children and the Well-Being of Young Families: How Are They Related?

The article presents the main results of an assessment of the impact of economic well-being on fertility in Russia. Interest in this topic stems from the contrast between the recent decline in the fertility rate of the Russian Federation and the significant increase in fertility during the first decade after the government implemented measures to boost the birth rate and support families. The study is based on available microdata from the Statistical Survey of Income and Participation in Social Programs (SSIPSP) conducted annually by Rosstat. The population studied consisted of young families, and the following factors were selected as determinants of material living conditions: household income, earnings of family members, social benefits, workdays of paid employment, access to plots land, housing conditions, and the population of the communities in which the families permanently reside. The list of factors was limited by the scope of SSIPSP questionnaires and the sample size. Statistical models were used to assess the combined influence of the factors studied on the probability that a young family would have children. Subsets of the most influential and statistically significant factors were identified, and the factors included in the models were ranked by their relative importance. Identifying the most important determinants of the birth rate in Russia may inform potential corrective public policy measures aimed at counteracting the country’s current trend toward depopulation. This study should be useful in adjusting current family and childhood support measures, which have not had the intended effect on fertility for several years.

1. Ageev A. I., Zolotareva O. A. Demograficheskaya politika v Rossii: otsenka rezul’tativnosti [Demographic Policy in Russia: Performance Evaluation]. Voprosy statistiki, 2023, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 53­71. https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2023-30-2-53-71. (In Russ).

2. Zakharov S. V. Skromnye rezul’taty pronatalistskoy politiki na fone dolgovremennoy evolyutsii rozhdaemosti v Rossii. Ch. 1 [The Modest Results of the Pronatalist Policy in Relation to the Long­Term Evolution of Fertility in Russia. Part 1]. Demograficheskoe obozrenie [Demographic Review], 2016, no. 3, pp. 6­38. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v3i3.1745. (In Russ).

3. Andersson G., Kreyenfeld M., Mika T. Welfare State Context, Female Earnings and Childbearing. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR), Working Paper 2009026, October 2009. https://www.demogr.mpg.de/papers/working/wp-2009-026.pdf

4. Atalay K., Li A. Whelan S. Housing Wealth and Fertility: Australian Evidence. School of Economics, University of Sydney, Economics Working Paper Series no. 8, 2017.

5. Becker G. Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries. Princeton, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1960.

6. Black D. A., Kolesnikova N., Sanders S. G., Taylor L. J. Are Children “Normal”? Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, pp. 21­33. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00257. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26203199/.

7. Clark J., Ferrer A. The Effect of House Prices on Fertility: Evidence From Canada. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 2019, no. 38, pp. 1­32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics­ejournal.ja.2019­38.

8. Galloway T. A., Hart R. K. Effects of Income and the Cost of Children on Fertility. QuasiExperimental Evidence From Norway. Statistics Norway, Research Department, Discussion Papers no. 828, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/192810.

9. Hoem J. M. The Impact of Public Policies on European Fertility. Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe, Demographic Research, 2008, vol. 19. pp. 249­260. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.10. http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol19/10/.

10. Jones L. E., Schoonbroodt A., Tertilt M. Fertility Theories: Can They Explain the Negative Fertility­Income Relationship? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 14266, 2008, August. DOI: 10.3386/w14266. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14266.

11. Jones L. E., Tertilt M. An Economic History of Fertility in the U. S.: 1826­1960. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper no. w12796, 2007. https://ssrn.com/abstract=953361.

12. Lovenheim M. F., Mumford K. J. Do Family Wealth Shocks Affect Fertility Choices? Evidence From the Housing Market. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, pp. 464­475. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00266.

13. McNown R. A Cointegration Model of Age­Specific Fertility and Female Labor Supply in the United States. Southern Economic Journal, 2003, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 344­358. DOI: 10.1002/j.2325­-8012.2003.tb00574.x.

14. Ost C. E. Housing and Children: Simultaneous Decisions? A Cohort Study of Young Adults’ Housing and Family Formation Decision. Journal of Population Economics, 2012, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 349­366.

15. Saguin K. No Flat, No Child in Singapore. Cointegration Analysis of Housing, Income and Fertility. ADBI, Working Paper Series no. 1231, 2021. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/689136/adbi-wp1231.pdf

16. Schultz T. P. Fertility and Income. Yale University Economic Growth Center, Center Discussion Paper no. 925, 2005. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=838227.

17. Schultz T. P. Population Programs: Measuring Their Impact on Fertility and the Personal Distribution of Their Effects. Journal of Policy Modeling, 1988, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 113­139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0161­8938(88)90037­-3.