Fiscal Dominance: The End of Inflation Targeting?
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-6-54-81
Abstract
The acceleration of government expenditures and public debt in both developed and developing countries has prompted concerns about the medium-term sustainability of fiscal policies. If these trends persist, countries may reach a point in the coming decades when fiscal dominance is challenged and the central bank’s ability to combat inflation through higher interest rates is constrained by the risk of undermining fiscal sustainability. Experts have frequently pointed out that, under such conditions, the central bank may be forced to abandon inflation targeting and adopt a more passive role. This paper offers an alternative scenario by proposing that the central bank’s mandate be adjusted to reflect the evolving economic landscape, specifically by incorporating the level of real public debt. This adjustment to the central bank’s mandate means that the optimal monetary policy rule would directly depend on the fiscal policy regime. The analysis conducted here using a New Keynesian DSGE model demonstrates that the kind of change in the mandate that this article proposes would make central bank policy more resilient toward changes in the fiscal policy regime and facilitate balance between stabilized inflation, output, and the level of public debt. In addition, the inclusion of debt in the central bank mandate would enable the bank to retain its active role in fighting inflation in response to an active fiscal policy. The article indicates that a fiscal dominance regime does not necessarily force the central bank to completely lose its independence in shaping monetary policy or to abandon the basic principles of inflation targeting.
About the Authors
A. A. AvakyanRussian Federation
Armen A. Avakyan - Unit Lead at the Center of Macroeconomic Research, Sberbank;a Research Intern at the International Laboratory for Macroeconomic Analysis, NRU Higher School of Economics.
11, Vavilova ul., Moscow, 117312; 11, Pokrovskiy bul., Moscow, 109028
O. S. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Olga S. Kuznetsova - PhD (Econ.), Senior Research Fellow at the International Laboratory for Macroeconomic Analysis, Assistant Professor of the Department of Theoretical Economics at the Faculty of Economic Sciences
11, Pokrovskiy bul., Moscow, 109028
References
1. Goryunov E. L., Drobyshevskiy S. M., Kudrin A. L., Trunin P. V. Prichiny i uroki uskoreniya global’noy inflyatsii [Causes and Lessons of Accelerating Global Inflation]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2023, no. 7, pp. 5-34. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-5-34. (In Russ.)
2. Ascari G., Florio F., Gobbi A. Price Level Targeting under Fiscal Dominance. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2023, vol. 137, no. 102876. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2023.102876.
3. Bhattarai S., Lee J. W., Park W. Y. Inflation Dynamics: The Role of Public Debt and Policy Regimes. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2014, vol. 67, pp. 93-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.07.004.
4. Calomiris C. W. Fiscal Dominance and the Return of Zero-Interest Bank Reserve Requirements. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 2023, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 223-233. DOI:10.20955/r.105.223-33.
5. Cevik S., Miryugin F. It’s Never Different: Fiscal Policy Shocks and Inflation. Warsaw, International Monetary Fund, Working Paper no. 23/98, 2023.
6. Clarida R., Gali J., Gertler M. The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 1999, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1661-1707. DOI: 10.1257/jel.37.4.1661.
7. Cohrain J. H. The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2023.
8. Davig T., Leeper E. M. Monetary-Fiscal Policy Interactions and Fiscal Stimulus. European Economic Review, 2011, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 211-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.04.004.
9. Farmer R., Zabczyk P. A Requiem for the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level. Warsaw, International Monetary Fund, Working Paper no. 19/219, 2019.
10. Haldane A. G., Read V. Monetary Policy Surprises and the Yield Curve. London, Bank of England, Working Paper no. 106, 2000.
11. Kumhof M., Nunes R., Yakadina I. Simple Monetary Rules Under Fiscal Dominance. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2010, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 63-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00278.x.
12. Leeper E. M. Equilibria Under ‘Active’ and ‘Passive’ Monetary and Fiscal Policies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1991, vol. 1, no. 27, pp. 129-147. DOI:10.1016/0304-3932(91)90007-B.
13. Sargent T. J., Wallace N. Some Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic. Minneapolis, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Quarterly Review, vol. 5 (Fall), 1981. DOI: 10.21034/qr.531.
14. Sims C. A. A Simple Model for Study of the Determination of the Price Level and the Interaction of Monetary and Fiscal Policy. Economic Theory, 1994, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 381-399. DOI: 10.1007/BF01215378.
15. Thornton D. L. Monetary Policy Transparency: Transparent About What? Manchester School, 2003, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 478-497. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9957.00363.
16. Woodford M. Fiscal Requirements for Price Stability. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 2001, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 669-728. DOI: 10.3386/w8072.
17. Woodford M. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2003.
18. Woodford M. Monetary Policy and Price Level Determinacy in a Cash-In-Advance Economy. Economic Theory, 1994, vol. 4, pp. 345-380. DOI: 10.1007/BF01215377.
Review
For citations:
Avakyan A.A., Kuznetsova O.S. Fiscal Dominance: The End of Inflation Targeting? Economic Policy. 2024;19(6):54-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-6-54-81