Analyzing Fiscal Multipliers in the Russian Federation Using a DSGE Model With Jaimovich-Rebelo Preferences
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-6-82-119
Abstract
This paper proposes a DSGE model for the Russian economy with a new specification in which the utility function of Ricardian households is described using Jaimovich-Rebelo preferences to reduce the impact of the income effect on labor supply. Along with Ricardian households, the model also considers non-Ricardian households that consume all their current income. The DSGE model depicts a small open economy that consists of two production sectors: domestic and export. The model is realistically calibrated and provides a qualitative analysis of differences in fiscal multipliers under varying conditions for the economy’s functioning in order to identify the impact of different versions of the utility function on the transmission of fiscal policy. Further econometric assessment of the model’s parameters would be required to obtain more accurate estimates of the fiscal multipliers. The conclusion is that, under free flow of capital, government spending on final consumption of goods and services results in multipliers greater than one if the increase in government spending is short-term (1 to 2 quarters), or if the central bank responds to a fiscal shock with monetary stimulus. For public investment and transfers, the multipliers are systematically less than one because much of this expenditure is spent on imports. With strict limits on the movement of capital, the situation changes dramatically; the multipliers for all the types of government spending considered when an increase in it is sustained for one year comes to about 1.5. However, a strong GDP response to government spending shocks typically has serious inflationary consequences. Therefore, the high inflation and rapid recovery of GDP with some signs of overheating observed in recent years can be qualitatively attributed to an expansive fiscal policy in the presence of restrictions on the movement of capital.
About the Author
A. V. PolbinRussian Federation
Andrey V. Polbin - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Laboratory for Mathematical Modeling of Economic Processes, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy; Lead Researcher, FU Under the Government of the RF.
3–5, Gazetnyy per., Moscow, 125993; 49/2, Leningradskiy pr., Moscow, 125167
References
1. Andreev M. Yu. Effektivnost’ byudzhetnogo pravila stran-eksporterov [Effectiveness of the Budget Rule of Exporting Countries]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2022, no. 12, pp. 72-97. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2022-12-72-97. (In Russ.)
2. Vlasov S. A., Deryugina E. B. Fiskal’nye mul’tiplikatory v Rossii [Fiscal Multipliers in Russia]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2018, vol. 2, no. 38, pp. 104-119. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2018-38-2-5. (In Russ.)
3. Votinov A. I., Gribova V. A., Lazaryan S. S. Analiz transmissionnogo mekhanizma gosudarstvennykh investitsiy na osnove DSGE-modeli [Analysing the Transmission Mechanism of Public Investment Based on a DSGE Model]. Finansovyy zhurnal [Financial Journal], 2023, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 8-26. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2023-5-8-26. (In Russ.)
4. Votinov A. I., Elkina M. A. Fiskal’noe stimulirovanie rossiyskoy ekonomiki: otsenka v ramkakh prostoy DSGE-modeli s fiskal’nym blokom [Fiscal Stimulus to the Russian Economy: Estimation Within a Simple DSGE Model With a Fiscal Block]. Finansovyy zhurnal [Financial Journal], 2018, no. 5, pp. 83-96. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2018-5-83-96. (In Russ.)
5. Votinov A. I., Stankevich I. P. VAR-podkhod k otsenke effektivnosti mer fiskal’nogo stimulirovaniya ekonomiki [VAR Approach to Assessing the Effectiveness of Fiscal Stimulus Measures in the Economy]. Finansovyy zhurnal [Financial Journal], 2017, no. 6(40), pp. 64-74. (In Russ.)
6. Zavyalov A. Yu., Nilova E. V., Shults D. N. Fiskal’nye mul’tiplikatory rasshirennogo byudzheta RF i sposoby ikh otsenivaniya [Fiscal Multipliers for the Expanded Budget of the Russian Federation and Methods for Estimating Them]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies of Russian Economic Development], 2015, no. 5, pp. 127-135. (In Russ.)
7. Zamnius A. V., Polbin A. V., Sinelnikov-Murylev S. G. Elastichnost’ predlozheniya truda po zarabotnoy plate u zhenatykh muzhchin v Rossii [Wage Elasticity of the Labor Supply Among Married Men in Russia]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal], 2022, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 177-212. DOI: 10.22394/1993-7601-2021-64-23-48. (In Russ.)
8. Zyablitskiy I. E. Otsenka fiskal’nykh mul’tiplikatorov v rossiyskoy ekonomike [Estimation of Fiscal Multipliers in the Russian Economy]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal], 2020, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 268-294. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8691-2020-24-2-268-294. (In Russ.)
9. Ivanova N., Kamenskikh M. Effektivnost’ gosudarstvennykh raskhodov v Rossii [Effectiveness of Public Expenditures in Russia]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2011, no. 1, pp. 176-192. (In Russ.)
10. Kudrin A., Knobel A. Byudzhetnaya politika kak istochnik ekonomicheskogo rosta [Fiscal Policy as a Source of Economic Growth]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 5-26. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-5-26. (In Russ.)
11. Polbin A. V. Otsenka vliyaniya shokov neftyanykh tsen na rossiyskuyu ekonomiku v vektornoy modeli korrektsii oshibok [Estimation of the Impact of Oil Price Shocks on the Russian Economy in a Vector Error Correction Model]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 27-49. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-10-27-49. (In Russ.)
12. Polbin A. V., Sinelnikov-Murylev S. G. Postroenie i kalibrovka DSGE-modeli dlya rossiyskoy ekonomiki s ispol’zovaniem impul’snykh otklikov vektornoy avtoregressii [Construction and Calibration of a DSGE Model for the Russian Economy Using Impulse Responses of Vector Autoregression]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 2024, no. 1(73), pp. 5-34. DOI: 10.22394/1993-7601-2024-73-5-34. (In Russ.)
13. Adjemian S., Juillard M., Karamé F., Mutschler W., Pfeifer J., Ratto M., Rion N., Villemot S. Dynare: Reference Manual Version 6. Paris, CEPREMAP, Dynare Working Papers no. 80, 2024.
14. Bilbiie F. O. Nonseparable Preferences, Frisch Labor Supply, and the Сonsumption Multiplier of Government Spending: One Solution to a Fiscal Policy Puzzle. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2011, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 221-251. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2010.00372.x.
15. Blanchard O., Perotti R. An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 1329-1368. DOI: 10.1162/003355302320935043.
16. Christiano L., Eichenbaum M., Rebelo S. When Is the Government Spending Multiplier Large? Journal of Political Economy, 2011, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 78-121. DOI: 10.1086/659312.
17. Coenen G., Erceg C., Freedman C., Furceri D., Kumhof M., Lalonde R., Laxton D., Lindé J., Mourougane A., Muir D., Mursula S., De Resende C., Roberts J., Roeger W., Snudden S., Trabandt M., In’t Veld J. Effects of Fiscal Stimulus in Structural Models. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2012, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22-68. DOI: 10.1257/mac.4.1.22.
18. Dubrovskaya J., Shults D., Kozonogova E. Constructing a Region DSGE Model With Institutional Features of Territorial Development. Computation, 2022, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 105. DOI: 10.3390/computation10070105.
19. Galí J., López-Salido J. D., Vallés J. Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2007, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 227-270. DOI: 10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.1.227.
20. Greenwood J., Hercowitz Z., Huffman G. W. Investment, Capacity Utilization, and the Real Business Cycle. American Economic Review, 1988, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 402-417.
21. Holden T., Levine P., Swarbrick J. Reconciling Jaimovich-Rebelo Preferences, Habit in Consumption and Labor Supply. Economics Letters, 2018, vol. 168, pp. 132-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.04.013.
22. Jaimovich N., Rebelo S. Can News About the Future Drive the Business Cycle? American Economic Review, 2009, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 1097-1118. DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.4.1097.
23. Karamysheva M. How Do Fiscal Adjustments Work? An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2022, vol. 137, pp. 104347. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104347.
24. King R. G., Plosser C. I., Rebelo S. T. Production, Growth and Business Cycles: I. The Basic Neoclassical Model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, vol. 21, no. 2-3, pp. 195-232. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90030-X.
25. Lucas R. E. Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1976, vol. 1, pp. 19-46. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2231(76)80003-6.
26. Martyanova E. V., Polbin A. V. General Equilibrium Model With the Entrepreneurial Sector for the Russian Economy. Russian Journal of Economics, 2023, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 109-133. DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.9.105790.
27. Monacelli T., Perotti R. Fiscal Policy, Wealth Effects, and Markups. NBER, Working Paper no. w14584, 2008. DOI: 10.3386/w14584.
28. Mountford A., Uhlig H. What Are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2009, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 960-992. DOI: 10.1002/jae.1079.
29. Schmitt‐Grohé S., Uribe M. What’s News in Business Cycles. Econometrica, 2012, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 2733-2764. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA8050.
30. Votinov A., Lazaryan S., Polshchikova Y. The Impact of the Cross-Sectoral Economic Structure on the Properties of DSGE Models. Russian Journal of Money and Finance, 2023, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 32-54.
31. Woodford M. Simple Analytics of the Government Expenditure Multiplier. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2011, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-35. DOI: 10.1257/mac.3.1.1.
Review
For citations:
Polbin A.V. Analyzing Fiscal Multipliers in the Russian Federation Using a DSGE Model With Jaimovich-Rebelo Preferences. Economic Policy. 2024;19(6):82-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-6-82-119