The Influence of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations on Regional Economic Growth
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-1-56-83
Abstract
The article examines the impact on regional economic growth from intraregional fiscal decentralization and the structure of regional financial assistance to local public budgets. For this purpose, a panel regression was arrived at using the data from Russia’s regions for 2011–2021 or for 2015– 2021. The resulting calculations demonstrate that the relationship between the degree of decentralization of expenditures and the rate of economic growth is ∩-shaped. While an increase in the decentralization of expenditures can have a positive effect on economic growth, that holds true only for those regions in which the initial level of decentralized expenditures is significantly below 30%. However, there is no significant relationship between the degree of decentralization of taxation and the rate of economic growth. The impact on GRP growth of individual instruments for providing financial assistance to local budgets turned out to be different for wealthier and low-income regions. In low-income regions, regional financial assistance has a negative effect on economic growth; that is, economic growth in such regions should be fostered by increasing the revenue of the local budgets (or revenue base). In addition, for low-income regions, targeted financial assistance tends to dampen economic growth; therefore, non-targeted financial assistance to such regions is preferable. Capital subsidies accelerate economic growth, and this effect is more pronounced in wealthier regions. However, neither increasing tax sharing by a few percentage points, nor an overall increase in the level of tax decentralization, showed a significant impact on economic growth.
About the Authors
I. Y. ArlashkinRussian Federation
Igor Y. Arlashkin, Research Fellow, Laboratory for Budget Policy Research, Institute of Applied Economic
Research
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571
A. N. Deryugin
Russian Federation
Alexander N. Deryugin, Senior Research Fellow, Laboratory for Budget Policy Research, Institute of Applied Economic Research
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571
I. N. Filippova
Russian Federation
Irina N. Filippova, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Research Fellow,
Department of Competition and Industrial Policy, Faculty of Economics ; Senior Lecturer
1–46, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119234; 1, International University Park Road, Shenzhen, 518172, China
References
1. Bozhechkova A.V., Mamedov A.A., Sinelnikov-Murylev S.G., Turuntseva M. Yu. Stabilizatsionnye svoystva transfertov, vydelyaemykh regionami Rossii iz federal’nogo byudzheta [Stabilization Properties of Federal Fiscal Transfers to Russian Regions]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2018, vol. 4, no. 40, pp. 61-83. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-3. (In Russ.)
2. Bukharskiy V.V., Lavrov A.M. Mezhbyudzhetnye otnosheniya i gosudarstvennoe upravlenie: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya detsentralizatsii [Intergovernmental Relations and Public Administration: Opportunities and Limitations of Decentralization]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Public Administration Issues], 2021, no. 2, pp. 126-153. https://vgmu.hse.ru/2021--2/477075178.html. (In Russ.)
3. Deryugin A., Filippova I., Arlashkin I. Vliyanie vnutriregional’noy nalogovoy detsentralizatsii na razvitie dokhodnoy bazy regionov [Impact of Intraregional Tax Decentralization on a Region’s Tax Base]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2021, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 8-33. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2021-2-8-33. (In Russ.)
4. Timushev E.N. Vliyanie mestnoy dokhodnoy byudzhetnoy detsentralizatsii na tempy regional’nogo ekonomicheskogo rosta [Impact of Local Revenue Fiscal Decentralization on the Rate of Regional Economic Growth]. In: Materialy V Vserossiyskogo simpoziuma po regional’noy ekonomike: v 2 t. [Materials From the Fifth Russian National Symposium on Regional Economics (in 2 vol.)]. Ekaterinburg, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of RAS, 2019, vol. 2, pp. 389-398. (In Russ.)
5. Timushev E.N. Vnutriregional’naya (mestnaya) byudzhetnaya detsentralizatsiya i investitsii v osnovnoy kapital v Rossii [Intraregional (Local) Fiscal Decentralization and Fixed Asset Investment in Russia]. Problemy prognozirovaniya [Studies on Russian Economic Development], 2021, no. 1(184), pp. 131-144. DOI 10.47711/0868-6351-184-131-144. (In Russ.)
6. Yushkov A.O. Byudzhetnaya detsentralizatsiya i regional’nyy ekonomicheskiy rost: teoriya, empirika, rossiyskiy opyt [Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Economic Growth: Theory, Empirical Studies, and Russian Experience]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2016, no. 2, pp. 94-110. DOI 10.32609/0042-8736-2016-2-94-110. (In Russ.).
7. Brueckner J. Fiscal Decentralization in LDCs: The Effects of Local Corruption and Tax Evasion. Urbana-Champaign, Department of Economics, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, 1999.
8. Brueckner J.K. Fiscal Federalism and Economic Growth. CESifo, Working Paper Series no. 1601, 2005.
9. Canavire-Bacarreza G., Martinez-Vazquez J., Yedgenov B. Identifying and Disentangling the Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth. World Development, 2020, vol. 127, art. 104742. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104742.
10. Forman K., Dougherty S., Blöchliger H. Synthesising Good Practices in Fiscal Federalism: Key Recommendations From 15 Years of Country Surveys. OECD, Economic Policy Papers no. 28, 2020. DOI: 10.1787/89cd0319-en.
11. Oates W. An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 1999, vol. 37(3), pp. 1120-1149.
12. Oates W.E. Fiscal Federalism. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.
13. Oshchepkov A., Lehmann H., Silvagni M.G. Regional Convergence in Russia: Estimating an Augmented Solow Model. Economic Systems, 2023, vol. 47(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101128.
14. Tanzi V. Fiscal Federalism and Efficiency: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects. In: Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 1995. Washington, DC, World Bank, 1996.
15. Thiessen U. Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High‐Income OECD Countries. Fiscal Studies, 2003, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 237-274. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00084.x.
16. Thiessen U. Fiscal Federalism in Western European and Selected Other Countries: Centralization or Decentralization? What Is Better for Economic Growth? DIW Discussion Papers, no. 224, 2000. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/18209/1/dp224.pdf.
Review
For citations:
Arlashkin I.Y., Deryugin A.N., Filippova I.N. The Influence of Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations on Regional Economic Growth. Economic Policy. 2025;20(1):56-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-1-56-83