Differentials in Countries’ Total Factor Productivity and the Factors Influencing Them
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-3-6-43
Abstract
The diminishing potential for enhancing productive resources in order to sustain economic growth demands greater emphasis on how efficiently they are used as measured by total factor productivity (TFP). Long-term trends, differences between countries, and macro-level factors were assessed using qualitative and quantitative analysis of economic and financial indicators for a sample of 74 countries from 1978 to 2022. The article confirms that Russia and most other countries have been experiencing a steady downturn in total factor productivity. In some cases, productivity has been falling since the 2008 global financial crisis because key factors changed in the post-crisis period. In particular, growth of TFP has become correlated with increasing fixed investment, a high level of domestic financial development and protection of property rights, and limitation of state intervention in the economy, as well as with following a model of capitalism that allows for a moderate level of state ownership. Those developing countries of Central and Eastern Europe that have consistently implemented market-oriented reforms have also been able to sustain growth. The increasing importance of highly country-specific variables suggests that countries are trying to make greater use of domestic economic policies to support TFP growth and thus counteract the global productivity decline observed by many economists. Although individual countries may succeed in maintaining their growth, such measures are not sufficient to prevent a global slowdown.
About the Authors
A. D. Radygin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander D. Radygin, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Director of the Applied Economics Research Institute
82, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 117517
A. E. Abramov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander E. Abramov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Laboratory for Analysis of Institutions and Financial Markets of the Applied Economics Research Institute
82, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 117517
M. I. Chernova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria I. Chernova, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher at the Laboratory for Analysis of Institutions and Financial Markets of the Applied Economics Research Institute
82, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, 117517
References
1. Abramov A. E., Dzhaokhadze E. D., Radygin A. D., Chernova M. I. Sovokupnaya faktornaya proizvoditel’nost’ rossiyskikh kompaniy: otsenki, trendy i faktory dinamiki [Total Factor Productivity of Russian Companies: Assessments, Trends, and Dynamic Factors]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2023, no. 11, pp. 5-27. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-11-5-27. (In Russ.)
2. Astafeva E. V., Drobyshevskiy S. M., Zyamalov V. E., Idrisov G. I., Kaukin A. S., Kosarev V. S., Miller E. M., Pavlov P. N., Sinelnikov-Murylev S. G., Turuntseva M. Yu. Nekotorye podkhody k modelirovaniyu otdel’nykh makroekonomicheskikh pokazateley [Approaches to Modeling Selected Macroeconomic Indicators]. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Gaydara [Gaidar Institute Publishing House], 2019. (In Russ.)
3. Bessonov V. A. O dinamike sovokupnoy faktornoy proizvoditel’nosti v rossiyskoy perekhodnoy ekonomike [On the Dynamics of Total Factor Productivity in the Russian Transition Economy]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal], 2004, no. 4, pp. 542-587. (In Russ.)
4. Bessonova E. V. Analiz dinamiki sovokupnoy proizvoditel’nosti faktorov na rossiyskikh predpriyatiyakh (2009-2015) [Analysis of Russian Firms’ TFP Growth From 2009 to 2015]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2018, no. 7, pp. 96-118. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2018-7-96-118. (In Russ.)
5. Bessonova E. V. Otsenka effektivnosti proizvodstva rossiyskikh promyshlennykh predpriyatiy [An Assessment of the Production Efficiency of Russian Industrial Firms]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 2007, no. 2, pp. 13-35. (In Russ.)
6. Bessonova E. V., Gonchar K. R. Mogut li rost konkurentsii i zhestkie byudzhetnye ogranicheniya snizit’ poteri effektivnosti gosudarstvennykh predpriyatiy? [Can the Growth of Competitive Pressure and Tightening of Budget Constraints Reduce the Efficiency Loss Due to State Ownership?]. Den’gi i kredit [Russian Journal of Money and Finance], 2022, no. 3, pp. 22-53. (In Russ.)
7. Bessonova E. V., Tsvetkova A. N. Rost proizvoditel’nosti i vykhod neeffektivnykh predpriyatiy s rynkov [Productivity Growth and Inefficient Firms’ Exit From the Market]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2020, no. 4, pp. 185-186. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2020-48-4-8. (In Russ.)
8. Voskoboynikov I. B., Baranov E. F., Bobyleva K. V., Kapelyushnikov R. I., Piontkovskiy D. I., Tolokonnikov A. V., Roskin A. A. Istochniki rosta proizvoditel’nosti truda posle shokov 1998 i 2008 godov v Rossii v kontekste perspektiv vosstanovleniya ekonomiki posle krizisa COVID-19 [Sources Of Labor Productivity Growth in Russia After the Shocks of 1998 and 2008 in the Context of the COVID-19 Economic Crisis]. Moscow, Izd. dom VShE [HSE Publishing House], 2020. (In Russ.)
9. Gonchar K. R., Kuznetsova B. V. Rossiyskaya promyshlennost’ na etape rosta: faktory konkurentosposobnosti firm [Russia’s Industrial Sector During the Growth Stage: Factors in the Competitiveness of Firms]. Moscow, Vershina, 2008. (In Russ.)
10. Kaukin A. S., Zhemkova A. M. Allokatsiya resursov i proizvoditel’nost’ rossiyskoy promyshlennosti [Allocation of Resources and Productivity of Russian Industry]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2023, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 68-99. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2023-5-68-99. (In Russ.)
11. Mitsek S. A. Analiz makroekonomicheskoy dinamiki sovokupnoy faktornoy proizvoditel’nosti ekonomiki Rossii [Analysis of the Macroeconomic Dynamics of Total Factor Productivity in the Russian Economy]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Regions], 2021, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 799-813. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-6. (In Russ.)
12. Yasin E. G., Avdasheva S. B., Golikova V. V., Gonchar K. R., Dolgopyatova T. G., Kuznetsov B. V., Yakovlev A. A. Predpriyatiya i rynki v 2005-2009 godakh: itogi dvukh raundov obsledovaniya rossiyskoy obrabatyvayushchey promyshlennosti [Enterprises and Markets From 2005 to 2009: Results of Two Rounds of Surveys of the Russian Manufacturing Industry]. Moscow, Izd. dom VShE [HSE Publishing House], 2010. (In Russ.)
13. Acemoglu D. Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2009.
14. Acemoglu D., Autor D., Patterson C. Bottlenecks: Sectoral Imbalances and the US Productivity Slowdown. NBER, Working Paper no. 31427, 2023. DOI: 10.3386/w31427.
15. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A . Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York, Crown Publishers, 2012.
16. Arellano M. Panel Data Econometrics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.
17. Baldwin R. The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Cambridge, London, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016.
18. Baqaee D. R., Farhi E. Productivity and Misallocation in General Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2020, vol. 135(1), pp. 105-63. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjz030.
19. Bloom N., Jones C. I., Van Reenen J., Webb M. Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find? American Economic Review, 2020, vol. 110(4), pp. 1104-1144. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20180338.
20. Bogetic Z., Olusi O. Drivers of Firm-Level Productivity in Russia’s Manufacturing Sector. World Bank Group, Policy Research Working Paper no. 6572, 2013.
21. Bosworth B., Collins S. M. Accounting for Growth: Comparing China and India. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2008, vol. 22(1), pp. 45-66. DOI: 10.1257/jep.22.1.45.
22. Brynjolfsson E., Rock D., Syverson C. The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies. NBER, Working Paper no. 25148, 2018.
23. Comin D., Anzoategui D., Gertler M., Martinez J. Endogenous Technology Adoption and R&D as Sources of Business Cycle Persistence. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2019, vol. 11(3), pp. 67-110. DOI: 10.1257/mac.20170269.
24. Das D. K., Erumban A. A., Aggarwal S., Sengupta S. Productivity Growth in India Under Different Policy Regimes. In: The World Economy: Growth or Stagnation? Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016. DOI: 10.1017/9781316534502.007.
25. Dieppe A. Global Productivity: Trends, Drivers, and Policies. Washington, DC, World Bank, 2021. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1608-6.
26. Eichengreen B., Donghyun P., Kwanho S. Growth Slowdowns Redux: New Evidence on the Middle-Income Trap. NBER, Working Paper no. 18673, 2013.
27. Eichengreen B., Donghyun P., Kwanho S. The Global Productivity Slump: Common and Country-Specific Factors. NBER, Working Paper no. 21556, 2015.
28. Entov R. M., Lugovoy O. V. Growth Trends in Russia After 1998. In: The Oxford Handbook of the Russian Economy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
29. Fernald J. Productivity and Potential Output Before, During, and After the Great Recession. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper 2014-15. 2015. DOI: 10.24148/wp2014-15.
30. Ferreira P. C., Galvao Jr. A. F., Gomes F. A., Pessoa S. A. The Effects of External and Internal Shocks on Total Factor Productivity. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2010, vol. 50(3), pp. 298-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2010.01.003.
31. Gordon R. J. The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War. New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 2016.
32. Hanson P. Russia to 2020. Finmeccanica Research Department, Occasional Paper, November, 2009.
33. He D., Zhang. W. How Dependent Is the Chinese Economy on Exports and in What Sense Has Its Growth been Export-Led? Journal of Asian Economics, 2010, vol. 21(1), pp. 87-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2009.04.005.
34. Im K. S., Pesaran M. H., Shin Y. Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 2003, vol. 115(1), pp. 53-74. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7.
35. James K. R., Kotak A., Tsomocos D. P. Ideas, Idea Processing, and TFP Growth in the US: 1899 to 2019. Systemic Risk Centre, London School of Economics, Discussion Paper Series no. 121, 2022. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4161964.
36. Jorgenson D. W., Ho M. S., Samuels J. D., Stiroh K. J. Industry Origins of the American Productivity Resurgence. Economic Systems Research, 2007, vol. 19(3), pp. 229-252. DOI: 10.4036/iis.2008.43.
37. Jorgenson D. W., Vu K. M. The Emergence of the New Economic Order: Growth in the G7 and the G20. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2013, vol. 35(3), pp. 389-399. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.03.001.
38. King R. G., Levine R. Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might be Right. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, vol. 108(3), pp. 717-737. DOI: 10.2307/2118406.
39. Kose M. A., Ohnsorge F. Falling Long-Term Growth Prospects: Trends, Expectations, and Policies. Washington, DC, World Bank Group, 2023. DOI: 10.1596/39497.
40. Kuboniwa M. Russian Growth Path and TFP Changes in Light of the Estimation of Production Function Using Quarterly Data. Post-Communist Economies, 2011, vol. 23(3), pp. 311-325. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2011.595269.
41. Levin A., Lin C. F., Chu C. S. J. Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 2002, vol. 108(1), pp. 1-24.
42. Levine R., Didier T., Montanes R. L., Schmukler S. L. Capital Market Financing and Firm Growth. World Bank Group, Policy Research Working Paper no. 9337, 2020.
43. Maddala G. S., Wu S. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1999, vol. 61(S1), pp. 631-652. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631.
44. Milanovic B. Capitalism Alone: The Future of the System That Rules the World. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2019.
45. Newey W. K., West K. D. A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix. Econometrica, 1987, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 703-708.
46. Okawa Y., Sanghi A. Potential Growth. Outlook and Option for the Russian Federation. World Bank Group, Policy Research Working Paper no. 8663, 2018.
47. Rehman F. U., Islam M. M. Total Factor Productivity (TFP) Nexus Within the Purview of FDI Outflow, Trade Openness, Innovation, Human Capital and Institutional Quality: Evidence From BRICS Economies. Applied Economics, 2023, vol. 55(7), pp. 783-801. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2094333.
48. Restuccia D., Rogerson R. The Causes and Costs of Misallocation . NBER, Working Paper no. 23422, 2017. DOI: 10.3386/w23422.
49. Russia Economic Report 32: Policy Uncertainty Clouds Medium-Term Prospects . Washington, DC, World Bank Group, 2014.
50. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York, Currency, 2017.
51. Voskoboynikov I. B. Sources of Long Run Economic Growth in Russia Before and After the Global Financial Crisis. Russian Journal of Economics, 2017, vol. 3(4), pp. 348-365. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3070227.
52. Wildnerova L., Blochliger H. What Makes a Productive Russian Firm? A Comparative Analysis Using Firm-Level Data. OECD Economics Department, Working Papers no. 15921, 2020.
53. Wright M., Wood G., Musacchio А., Okhmatovskiy I., Grosman A., Doh J. State Capitalism in International Context: Varieties and Variations. Journal of World Business, 2021, vol. 56, pp. 101-160. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101160.
Review
For citations:
Radygin A.D., Abramov A.E., Chernova M.I. Differentials in Countries’ Total Factor Productivity and the Factors Influencing Them. Economic Policy. 2024;19(3):6-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2024-3-6-43
Views:
1344
Email this article 