Preview

Economic Policy

Advanced search

On Some Ways to Mitigate the Macroeconomic Policy Trilemma

https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-2-6-33

Abstract

The choice of a macroeconomic policy in an open economy is constrained by a trilemma in which only two of the following three policy goals can be achieved at the same time: exchange rate stability, monetary independence, and capital mobility. The constraints on economic policy imposed by this trilemma have been confirmed in both theory and practice for more than sixty years. Central banks are nevertheless forced to seek some compromise that will relax those constraints. The economic literature has proposed various tools and mechanisms for making them less rigid and facilitating central banks in reaching their policy goals, an especially urgent concern for developing countries. The tools that have been offered were effective before the global financial crisis, but this study shows that they have now lost their usefulness because global economic trends linked to capital flows, exchange rate stability, and debt dynamics have changed. The paper assesses the effectiveness of the best-known instruments for easing the trilemma, such as accumulating large foreign exchange reserves and foreign exchange interventions by monetary authorities that partially substitute for capital controls. A new approach based on the ratio of short-term external public debt to a country’s foreign exchange reserves is proposed. The conclusion is that decreasing the ratio of debt to reserves makes the restrictions imposed by the trilemma less harsh and also enables fuller realization of macroeconomic policy goals, an outcome confirmed by data from developing economies after the financial crisis.

About the Authors

N. D. Golotvin
National Research University Higher School of Economics ; Renaissance Capital
Russian Federation

Nikolai D. Golotvin, Master’s Degree Student, Faculty of Economic Sciences; Analyst

11, Pokrovskiy bul., Moscow, 109028 

10, Presnenskaya nab., Moscow, 123112 



S. F. Seregina
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Svetlana F. Seregina, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor of the Department of Theoretical Economics, Faculty of Economic Sciences

11, Pokrovskiy bul., Moscow, 109028 



References

1. Afonso A., Huart F., Jalles J. T., Stanek P. International Transmission of Interest Rates: The Role of International Reserves and Sovereign Debt. EconPol, Working Paper no. 54, 2021.

2. Aizenman J. International Reserves, Exchange Rates, and Monetary Policy: From the Trilemma to the Quadrilemma. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance, 2019. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.313.

3. Aizenman J. The Impossible Trinity - From the Policy Trilemma to the Policy Quadrilemma. University of California, Economics Department, Working Paper no. 678, 2011.

4. Aizenman J., Chinn M. D., Ito H. Assessing the Emerging Global Financial Architecture: Measuring the Trilemma’s Configurations Over Time. NBER, Working Paper No w14533, 2008. DOI: 10.3386/w14533.

5. Aizenman J., Chinn M. D., Ito H. Monetary Policy Spillovers and the Trilemma in the New Normal: Periphery Country Sensitivity to Core Country Conditions. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2016, vol. 68, pp. 298-330. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.02.008.

6. Aizenman J., Chinn M. D., Ito H. Surfing the Waves of Globalization: Asia and Financial Globalization in the Context of the Trilemma. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2011, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 290-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjie.2011.06.003.

7. Aizenman J., Chinn M. D., Ito H. The Emerging Global Financial Architecture: Tracing and Evaluating New Patterns of the Trilemma Configuration. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2010, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 615-641. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.01.005.

8. Aizenman J., Chinn M. D., Ito H. The “Impossible Trinity” Hypothesis in an Era of Global Imbalances: Measurement and Testing. Review of International Economics, 2013a, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 447-458.

9. Aizenman J., Jinjarak Y., Park D. Capital Flows and Economic Growth in the Era of Financial Integration and Crisis, 1990-2010. Open Economies Review, 2013b, vol. 24, pp. 371-396. DOI: 10.1007/s11079-012-9247-3.

10. Aizenman J., Marion N. International Reserve Holdings With Sovereign Risk and Costly Tax Collection. The Economic Journal, 2004, vol. 114, no. 497, pp. 569-591. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00232.x.

11. Board F. S. US Dollar Funding and Emerging Market Economy Vulnerabilities. Basel, Financial Stability Board, 2022.

12. Central Bank of the Russian Federation, Monetary Policy in Russia: Recent Challenges and Changes. BIS, Working Papers no. 78, 2014.

13. Chinn M. D., Ito H. A New Measure of Financial Openness. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2008, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 309-322. DOI: 10.1080/13876980802231123.

14. Dornbusch R. Exchange Rate Expectations and Monetary Policy. Journal of International Economics, 1976, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 231-244.

15. Edwards S. How Effective Are Capital Controls? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1999, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 65-84. DOI: 10.1257/jep.13.4.65.

16. Gallagher K. P. Ruling Capital: Emerging Markets and the Reregulation of Cross-Border Finance. Cornell, Cornell University Press, 2014. DOI: 10.7591/9780801454615.

17. Glick R., Hutchison M. Navigating the Trilemma: Capital Flows and Monetary Policy in China. Journal of Asian Economics, 2009, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 205-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2009.02.011.

18. Han X., Wei S. J. International Transmissions of Monetary Shocks: Between a Trilemma and a Dilemma. Journal of International Economics, 2018, vol. 110, pp. 205-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.11.005.

19. International Debt Report 2023. Washington, DC, The World Bank, 2023.

20. Klein M. W., Shambaugh J. C. Rounding the Corners of the Policy Trilemma: Sources of Monetary Policy Autonomy. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2015, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 33-66. DOI: 10.1257/mac.20130237.

21. Lane P. R., Milesi-Ferretti G. M. The External Wealth of Nations Mark II: Revised and Extended Estimates of Foreign Assets and Liabilities, 1970-2004. Journal of International Economics, 2007, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 223-250.

22. Ligonniere S. Trilemma, Dilemma and Global Players. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2018, vol. 85, pp. 20-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2018.03.001.

23. Mansour L. The Power of International Reserves: The Impossible Trinity Becomes Possible. GATE, Working Papers no. wp1420, 2014. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2477342.

24. Mundell R. A. Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy Under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1963, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 475-485.

25. Mundell R. A. Flexible Exchange Rates and Employment Policy. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 1961, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 509-517.

26. Obstfeld M. Trilemmas and Tradeoffs: Living With Financial Globalization. BIS, Working Papers no. 480, 2015.

27. Obstfeld M., Taylor A. M. International Monetary Relations: Taking Finance Seriously. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 3-28. DOI: 10.1257/jep.31.3.3.

28. Obstfeld M., Zhou H. The Global Dollar Cycle. NBER, Working Paper no. w31004, 2023.

29. Park D., Ramayandi A., Tian S. Debt Buildup And Currency Vulnerability: Evidence From Global Markets. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2022, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 2017-2035. DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2021.1949982.

30. Reinhart C. M., Ohnsorge F. L., Rogoff K. S., Kose M. A. The Aftermath of Debt Surges. Annual Review of Economics, 2022, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 637-663. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-015343.

31. Rey H. Dilemma Not Trilemma: The Global Financial Cycle and Monetary Policy Independence. NBER, Working Paper no. w21162, 2015. DOI: 10.3386/w21162.

32. Ricci M. L. A., Shi W. Trilemma or Dilemma: Inspecting the Heterogeneous Response of Local Currency Interest Rates to Foreign Rates. International Monetary Fund, IMF Working Papers 2016/075, 2016. DOI: 10.5089/9781475522921.001

33. Rosero L. D. Easing the Trilemma Through Reserve Accumulation? The Latin American Case. In: The Political Economy of International Finance in an Age of Inequality. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 106-134.

34. Schoenmaker D. Governance of International Banking: The Financial Trilemma. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199971596.001.0001.

35. Sheel A. A Monetary Policy Rule for Emerging Market Economies: The Impossible Trinity and the Taylor Rule. Economic and Political Weekly, 2014, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 39-42.

36. Steiner A. Central Banks and Macroeconomic Policy Choices: Relaxing the Trilemma. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2017, vol. 77, pp. 283-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.07.005.


Review

For citations:


Golotvin N.D., Seregina S.F. On Some Ways to Mitigate the Macroeconomic Policy Trilemma. Economic Policy. 2025;20(2):6-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-2-6-33

Views: 393


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-5124 (Print)
ISSN 2411-2658 (Online)