The Impact of Government Support on the Financial Efficiency of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-3-62-95
Abstract
This article elucidates the impact that various forms of government support have on the financial efficiency of small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) in Russia. The empirical literature on this topic is inadequate to date even though the SME sector is extremely important for the socioeconomic development of Russia. Seven key types of this government support are examined, including initiatives in finance, credits and loans, education, consulting, information, innovation, and property issues. The sample studied employs data on 165,000 Russian SMEs from 2019 to 2022. Performance indicators such as return on equity, return on assets, and employee count are utilized to analyze the effects of government support. The analysis relies on the difference-in-differences method applied to a panel data model which is responsive to effects on individual companies and also on a dynamic model. This study finds that financial, informational, and, to a lesser extent, consulting support have a positive effect on profitability that begins in the year following assistance; the impact of the other four types is much less obvious. The negligible impact of some kinds of support may mean that they are focused on particular aspects of a company’s activities and will have an economic effect only indirectly and over a longer term. These results deepen understanding of ways to provide stimulus to SMEs in the short term and thus enable the managers and owners of the companies themselves to understand the main types of government support that, on average, facilitate rapid growth in business efficiency. The results also suggest the following economic policy recommendations: optimizing the support structure, developing information platforms, expanding non-financial support instruments, reducing bureaucratic barriers, and implementing a comprehensive system for monitoring and evaluating support outcomes.
Supporting agencies: This study comprises research findings from project No 23-78-10149 supported by the Russian Science Foundation. https://rscf.ru/project/23-78-10149/.
About the Authors
I. N. Naidenova
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Iuliia N. Naidenova, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Deputy Head of the International Laboratory of Intangible-Driven Economy
37, Gagarina bul., Perm, 614060
S. N. Paklina
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sofia N. Paklina, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Junior Research Fellow of the International Laboratory of Intangible-Driven Economy
37, Gagarina bul., Perm, 614060
P. A. Parshakov
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Petr A. Parshakov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Head of the International Laboratory of Intangible-Driven Economy
37, Gagarina bul., Perm, 614060
G. V. Teplykh
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Grigorii V. Teplykh, Junior Research Fellow of the International Laboratory of Intangible-Driven Economy
37, Gagarina bul., Perm, 614060
E. I. Cherednikova
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena I. Cherednikova, Research Assistant of the International Laboratory of Intangible-Driven Economy
37, Gagarina bul., Perm, 614060
References
1. Akbasheva D. M., Mongush B. O. Aktual’nye problemy malogo i srednego biznesa [Actual Problems of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses]. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya [Trends in the Development of Science and Education], 2024, vol. 106, pp. 14-16. DOI: 10.18411/trnio-02-2024-176. (In Russ.)
2. Barinova V. A., Zemtsov S. P. Mezhdunarodnyy sravnitel’nyy analiz roli malykh i srednikh predpriyatiy v natsional’noy ekonomike: statisticheskoe issledovanie [International Comparative Analysis of the Role of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the National Economy: A Statistical Study]. Voprosy statistiki, 2019, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 55-71. DOI: 10.34023/2313-6383-2019-26-6-55-71. (In Russ.)
3. Barinova V. A., Krasnoselskikh A. N. Podderzhka malogo i srednego predprinimatel’stva na regional’nom urovne: mezhdunarodnyy opyt i rossiyskie osobennosti [Support of Small Businesses at the Regional Level: International Experience and Russian Features]. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii [Economic Development of Russia], 2019, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 55-62. (In Russ.)
4. Burov V. Yu. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya malym predprinimatel’stvom v usloviyakh dominirovaniya tenevoy ekonomicheskoy deyatel’nosti [Improvement of the System of State Regulation by Small Business in the Conditions of Domination of Shadow Economic Activity]. Tenevaya ekonomika [Shadow Economy], 2019, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9-16. DOI: 10.18334/tek.3.1.39948. (In Russ.)
5. Zemtsov S. P., Barinova V. A., Semenova R. I. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka vysokikh tekhnologiy i innovatsiy v Rossii [Public Support of High Technologies and Innovation in Russia]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 2019, no. 3(245), pp. 33-44. (In Russ.)
6. Zemtsov S. P., Tsareva Y. V., Salimova D. R., Barinova V. A. Zanyatost’ v malom i srednem biznese v Rossii: v poiskakh faktorov rosta [Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Russia: In Search of the Employment Growth Factors]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2021, vol. 12, pp. 66-93. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-12-66-93. (In Russ.)
7. Zemtsov S. P., Chepurenko A. Yu., Barinova V. A., Krasnoselskih A. N. Novaya predprinimatel’skaya politika dlya Rossii posle krizisa 2020 goda [New Entrepreneurship Policy in Russia After the 2020 Crisis]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2020, vol. 10, pp. 44-67. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-10-44-67. (In Russ.)
8. Kokoreva M. S., Stepanova A. N. Finansovaya arkhitektura i rynochnaya effektivnost’ kompanii: empiricheskiy analiz na dannykh rossiyskikh kompaniy [Financial Architecture and Corporate Performance: Evidence From Russia]. Korporativnye finansy [Journal of Corporate Finance Research], 2012, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 34-44. DOI: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.6.2.2012.34-44. (In Russ.)
9. Kuzyk M., Fedyunin A., Simachev Y. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka rossiyskikh firm: sfery primeneniya i tochki vozdeystviya [State Support for Russian Firms: Areas of Application and Points of Influence]. In: IV Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy kongress «REK-2020». T. XVI. Tematicheskaya konferentsiya «Otraslevye rynki i promyshlennaya politika» (sbornik materialov) [IV Russian Economic Congress “REC-2020”. Vol. XVI. Thematic Conference “Industry Markets and Industrial Policy” (Collection of Materials)]. Moscow, 2020. https://publications.hse.ru/chapters/508104147. (In Russ.)
10. Okhrimenko A. V., Gachegov M. A. Otsenka effektivnosti podderzhki malogo i srednego predprinimatel’stva [Assessing the Effectiveness of Support for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 6. Economics], 2023, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 124-146. DOI: 10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-4-6. (In Russ.)
11. Radzhabova M. G., Mallaeva A. A. Problemy razvitiya biznesa v Rossii v razreze sub”ektov malogo i srednego predprinimatel’stva [Problems of Business Development in Russia in the Context of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo [Economy and Entrepreneurship], 2021, no. 3(128), pp. 896-899. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2021.128.3.180. (In Russ.)
12. Ruzhanskaya L. S., Kuzyk M. G., Simachev Y. V., Fedyunina A. A. Faktory primeneniya skvoznykh tsifrovykh tekhnologiy: vyzovy dlya rossiyskikh proizvoditeley [End-to-End Digitalization Factors: Challenges for Russian Manufacturers]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2023, no. 9, pp. 5-28. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-9-5-28. (In Russ.)
13. Simachev Yu. V., Kuzyk M. G. Vliyanie gosudarstvennykh institutov razvitiya na innovatsionnoe povedenie firm: kachestvennye effekty [The Impact of State Development Institutions on the Innovative Behavior of Firms: Qualitative Effects]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2017, no. 2, pp. 109-135. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-2-109-135. (In Russ.)
14. Simachev Yu. V., Kuzyk M. G. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka predpriyatiy: benefitsiary i effekty [State Support of Enterprises in Russia: Beneficiaries and Effects]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2020, no. 3, pp. 63-83. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-3-63-83. (In Russ.)
15. Simachev Yu. V., Kuzyk M. G., Feigina V. V. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka innovatsiy v Rossii: chto mozhno skazat’ o vozdeystvii na kompanii nalogovykh i finansovykh mekhanizmov? [State Support for Innovations in Russia: What Can be Said About the Impact of Tax and Financial Mechanisms on Companies?]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Journal of Management], 2014, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7-38. (In Russ.)
16. Simachev Yu. V., Yakovlev A. A., Golikova V. V., Gorodny N. A., Kuznetsov B. V., Kuzyk M. G., Fedyunina A. A. Rossiyskie promyshlennye kompanii v usloviyakh «vtoroy volny» sanktsionnykh ogranicheniy: strategii reagirovaniya [Russian Industrial Companies Under the “Second Wave” of Sanctions: Response Strategies]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2023, no. 12, pp. 5-30. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2023-12-5-30. (In Russ.)
17. Stabinskayte Yu. A. Problemy i instrumenty finansirovaniya innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti malykh i srednikh predpriyatiy Evropeyskogo soyuza [Problems and Financial Instruments for Innovation Activities in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises of the European Union]. Vestnik universiteta [Bulletin of the University], 2016, no. 11, pp. 185-190. (In Russ.)
18. Suschaya E. S., Kuzyk M. G., Gorodny N. A. Gosudarstvennaya podderzhka biznesa v period pandemii: otsenka effektivnosti [Government Support for Business During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Assessing Effectiveness]. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya [Public Administration Issues], 2024, no. 4, pp. 152-190. DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2024-0-4-152-190. (In Russ.)
19. Turkaeva L. V., Arsakhanova G. A., Amadaev A. A. Upravlenie razvitiem chelovecheskikh resursov na malykh i srednikh predpriyatiyakh [Management of Human Resource Development in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo [Economy and Entrepreneurship], 2023, no. 11(160), pp. 1396-1399. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2023.160.11.267. (In Russ.)
20. Tutygin A.G., Chizhova L.A., Korobov V.B. Neopredelennost’ v otsenkakh vliyayushchikh faktorov razlichnymi kategoriyami lits, prinimayushchikh resheniya [Uncertainty in Estimates of Influencing Factors by Different Categories of Decision-Makers]. Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal [Economics and Management: Scientific and Practical Journal], 2020, vol. 2, no. 152, pp. 84-89. DOI: 10.34773/EU.2020.2.18. (In Russ.)
21. Fedorova E. A., Fedotova M. A., Nikolaev A. E. Otsenka vliyaniya sanktsiy na rezul’taty deyatel’nosti rossiyskikh kompaniy [Assessing the Impact of Sanctions on Russian Companies Performance]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2016, no. 3, pp. 34-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-3-34-45. (In Russ.)
22. Yakovlev A. A., Ershova N. V., Uvarova O. M. Kakim firmam gosudarstvo okazyvaet podderzhku: analiz izmeneniya prioritetov v krizisnykh usloviyakh [What Kind of Russian Firms Get State Support? The Analysis of Changes in Priorities Under Crisis Conditions]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2020, no. 3, pp. 46-62. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-3-47-62. (In Russ.)
23. Anokhin S. A., Spitsin V., Akerman E., Morgan T. Technological Leadership and Firm Performance in Russian Industries During Crisis. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 2021, vol. 15, article e00223. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00223.
24. Aremu M. A., Adeyemi S. L. Small and Medium Scale Enterprises as a Survival Strategy for Employment Generation in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2011, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 200-206. DOI: 10.5539/JSD.V4N1P200.
25. Baker A. C., Larcker D. F., Wang C. C. How Much Should We Trust Staggered Differencein-Differences Estimates? Journal of Financial Economics, 2022, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 370-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.01.004.
26. Bartolacci F., Nguyen H. T. T., Vu Van H., Tran T. Q. The Impact of Government Support on Firm Performance in Vietnam. New Evidence From a Dynamic Approach. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 2018, vol. 23, pp. 101-123. DOI: 10.21315/aamj2018.23.2.5.
27. Beck T. H. Financing Constraints of SMEs in Developing Countries: Evidence, Determinants and Solutions. Financing Innovation-Oriented Businesses to Promote Entrepreneurship, 2007. https://repository.tilburguniversity.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/a21cf137-ace8-4b3f-bb83-2c24adf3bec9/content.
28. Blundell R., Bond S. GMM Estimation With Persistent Panel Data: An Application to Production Functions. Econometric Reviews, 2000, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 321-340. DOI: 10.1080/07474930008800475.
29. Bykova A., Lopez-Iturriaga F. Exports-Performance Relationship in Russian Manufacturing Companies: Does Foreign Ownership Play an Enhancing Role? Baltic Journal of Management, 2018, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 20-40. DOI: 10.1108/BJM-04-2017-0103.
30. Catanzaro A., Messeghem K., Sammut S. Effectiveness of Export Support Programs: Impact on the Relational Capital and International Performance of Early Internationalizing Small Businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 2019, vol. 57, pp. 436-461. DOI: 10.1111/jsbm.12489.
31. Criscuolo C., Martin R., Overman H., Van Reenen J. The Effect of Industrial Policy on Corporate Performance: Evidence From Panel Data. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, 2007. https://cep.lse.ac.uk/textonly/_new/staff/vanreenen/RSA_final.pdf.
32. David P. A., Hall B. H., Toole A. A. Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence. Research Policy, 2000, vol. 29, no. 4-5, pp. 497-529. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6.
33. Dezhina I. G. Science and Innovation Policy of the Russian Government: A Variety of Instruments With Uncertain Outcomes. Public Administration Issues, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 7-26. DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2017-0-5-7-26.
34. Dvouletý O., Srhoj S., Pantea S. Public SME Grants and Firm Performance in European Union: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence. Small Business Economics, 2021, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 243-263. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-019-00306-x.
35. Gai L., Arcuri M. C., Ielasi F. How Does Government-Backed Finance Affect SMEs’ Crisis Predictors? Small Business Economics, 2023, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1205-1229. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-023-00733-x.
36. Goodman-Bacon A. Difference-in-Differences With Variation in Treatment Timing. Journal of Econometrics, 2021, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 254-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014.
37. Harash E., Al-Tamimi K., Al-Timimi S. The Relationship Between Government Policy and Financial Performance: A Study on the SMEs in Iraq. China-USA Business Review, 2014, vol. 13, no. 4, рр. 290-295. DOI: 10.17265/1537-1514/2014.04.005.
38. Huynh L. D. T., Hoang K., Ongena S. The Impact of Foreign Sanctions on Firm Performance in Russia. The British Accounting Review, 2025, article in press. DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2025.101586.
39. Ilyukhin E. The Impact of Financial Leverage on Firm Performance: Evidence From Russia. Korporativnye finansy [Corporate Finance], 2015, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 24-36. DOI: 10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.9.2.2015.24-36.
40. Kersten R., Harms J., Liket K., Maas K. Small Firms, Large Impact? A Systematic Review of the SME Finance Literature. World Development, 2017, vol. 97, pp. 330-348. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.012.
41. Kumar S., Singh P. An Analysis of Government Support Programs for Small Business Development and Growth. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance, 2023, vol. 10, no. 2, рр. 8-19. DOI: 10.19085/sijbpg100201.
42. Kuznecovs M., Pal S. Does Corporate Governance Reform Necessarily Boost Firm Performance? Recent Evidence From Russia. IZA Discussion Papers, no. 6519, 2012. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2051362.
43. Lalinsky T., Pál R. Efficiency and Effectiveness of the COVID-19 Government Support: Evidence From Firm-Level Data. EIB Working Papers, no. 2021/06, 2021. DOI: 10.2867/888346.
44. Lee S. Y. Entrepreneurship, Small Businesses, and Economic Growth in Small Cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 2014, vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 311-343.
45. Molodchik M., Jardon C. F., Barajas A. Intangible-Driven Performance: Company Size Matters. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 2016, vol. 7, no. 3, article 225. DOI: 10.1504/IJKBD.2016.078527.
46. Nguyen D. H., Khominich I. P. Financial Performance of EU-27 Fossil Fuel Companies and Their Counterparts After Imposing Energy Sanctions on Russia: A Comparative Analysis. Russian Journal of Economics, 2024, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 190-210. DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.10.124364.
47. Oh S., Kim J., Jang P. Analysis of the Effect of Corporate Employment Creation by Government R&D Support. In: 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2019, pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893742.
48. Onjewu A.-K.E., Olan F., Paul S., Nguyen H.T. T. The Effect of Government Support on Bureaucracy, COVID-19 Resilience and Export Intensity: Evidence From North Africa. Journal of Business Research, 2023, vol. 156, article 113468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113468.
49. Otache I., Usang O. U. E. Innovation Capability and SME Performance in Times of Economic Crisis: Does Government Support Moderate? African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 2022, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 76-88. DOI: 10.1108/AJEMS-08-2021-0362.
50. Pandya V. M. Comparative Analysis of Development of SMEs in Developed and Developing Countries. In: The 2012 International Conference on Business and Management, 2012, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1-20.
51. Pergelova A., Angulo-Ruiz F. The Impact of Government Financial Support on the Performance of New Firms: The Role of Competitive Advantage as an Intermediate Outcome. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2014, vol. 26, no. 9-10, pp. 663-705. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2014.980757.
52. Peter F., Adegbuyi O., Olokundun M., Peter A. O., Amaihian A. B., Ibidunni A. S. Government Financial Support and Financial Performance of SMEs. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 2018, vol. 17, no. 3.
53. Piza C., Cravo T. A., Taylor L., Gonzalez L., Musse I., Furtado I., Sierra A. C., Abdelnour S. The Impact of Business Support Services for Small and Medium Enterprises on Firm Performance in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2016, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-167. DOI: 10.4073/csr.2016.1.
54. Pletnev D., Naumova K. Cross-Industrial Analysis of High-Growth Firm Performance During the Pandemic: Middle-Sized Russian Firms’ Evidence. Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference. Cham, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022a, vol. 26, pp. 101-119. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-30061-5_6.
55. Pletnev D., Naumova K. Russian Transport High-Growth Firms During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Transportation Research Procedia, 2022b, vol. 63, pp. 2542-2549. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.293.
56. Razumovskaia E., Yuzvovich L., Kniazeva E., Klimenko M., Shelyakin V. The Effectiveness of Russian Government Policy to Support SMEs in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2020, vol. 6, no. 4, article 160. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc6040160.
57. Roper S., Hewitt-Dundas N. Grant Assistance and Small Firm Development in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 2001, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 99-117. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9485.00187.
58. Rüttenauer T., Aksoy O. When Can We Use Two-Way Fixed-Effects (TWFE): A Comparison of TWFE and Novel Dynamic Difference-in-Differences Estimators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09928, 2024. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.09928.
59. Sanga M. H., Situmorang R., Seik M. F., Bangngu S. A., Taus S. P. W. The Effect of Liquidity on the Financial Performance of Companies in the Property, Real Estate and Building Construction Sectors Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2023. Science Get Journal, 2025, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.69855/science.v2i1.97.
60. Shekar M., Hassan M., Al Mubarak M. Revisiting the Challenges Affecting SMEs Through Behavioral Approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2021, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 234-258. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i9/10753.
61. Simachev Y., Kuzyk M., Feygina V. Public Support for Innovation in Russian Firms: Looking for Improvements in Corporate Performance Quality. International Advances in Economic Research, 2015, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 13-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11294-014-9509-5.
62. Songling Y., Ishtiaq M., Anwar M., Ahmed H. The Role of Government Support in Sustainable Competitive Position and Firm Performance. Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, no. 10, article 3495. DOI: 10.3390/su10103495.
63. Spitsin V., Vukovic D., Anokhin S., Spitsina L. Company Performance and Optimal Capital Structure: Evidence of Transition Economy (Russia). Journal of Economic Studies, 2021, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 313-332. DOI: 10.1108/JES-09-2019-0444.
64. Verbeek M., Nijman T. Testing for Selectivity Bias in Panel Data Models. International Economic Review, 1992, pp. 681-703. DOI: 10.2307/2527133.
65. Vintilă G., Nenu E. A. Liquidity and Profitability Analysis on the Romanian Listed Companies. Journal of Eastern Europe Research in Business & Economics, 2016, vol. 2016, pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.5171/2016.161707.
66. Zemtsov S., Barinova V., Semenova R., Mikhailov A. Entrepreneurship Policy and SME Development During Pandemic Crisis in Russia. Regional Research of Russia, 2022a, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 321-334. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970522700071.
67. Zemtsov S., Tsareva Y., Barinova V. A., Belitski M., Krasnoselskikh A. N. Small Business in Russia: Institutions, Market Potential, Taxes and Digitalization. Post-Communist Economies, 2022b, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1029-1053. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2022.2108244.
Review
For citations:
Naidenova I.N., Paklina S.N., Parshakov P.A., Teplykh G.V., Cherednikova E.I. The Impact of Government Support on the Financial Efficiency of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Economic Policy. 2025;20(3):62-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-3-62-95
Views:
49
Email this article 