“Unfair” Inequality and Political Trust
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-4-8-43
Abstract
The relationship between objective inequality (income inequality and “unfair” inequality) and political trust in developed and developing countries is analyzed in this paper. The author specifies and estimates multilevel linear regression models and corrects for bias in the coefficient estimates due to outliers. To ensure the comparability and reliability of the econometric results, three alternative sets of estimates for “unfair” inequality are considered: estimates from inequality of opportunity, from intergenerational persistence, and from intergenerational mobility. The main results indicate that there is compelling evidence for erosion of trust caused by income inequality and “unfair” inequality in developed European countries. But in post-Soviet states and other developing countries, objective inequality and political trust are not closely related (“unfair” inequality has a weak negative impact on political trust). In these countries, perceptions of equality of opportunity become a more reliable correlate of political trust. It is also demonstrated that wealthier households are more loyal to political institutions. This is the case for both developed and developing economies. In developed European states, however, the relationship between individual well-being and political trust is mediated by the degree of income inequality and “unfair” inequality. The author concludes that in developed European countries the relationship between income inequality and political trust does not depend upon the level of “unfair” inequality.
Keywords
well-being,
income,
inequality of opportunity,
intergenerational mobility,
developed countries,
developing countries
JEL: P26, P27, P37
About the Author
V. N. Ovchinnikov
Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav N. Ovchinnikov – Junior Researcher
3, Nastasinskiy per., Moscow, 127006
References
1. Aalberg T. Achieving Justice: Comparative Public Opinions on Income Distribution. Leiden, Brill Academic Publisher, 2003.
2. Aiyar S., Ebeke C. Inequality of Opportunity, Inequality of Income and Economic Growth. IMF Working Papers, no. 034, 2019. DOI:10.5089/9781484396988.001.
3. Alesina A., La Ferrara E. Who Trusts Others? Journal of Public Economics, 2002, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 207234. DOI:10.1016/S00472727(01)000846.
4. Anderson C. Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective. Electoral Studies, 2000, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 151170. DOI:10.1016/S02613794(99)000451.
5. Anderson C. J., Singer M. M. The Sensitive Left and the Impervious Right: Multilevel Mod els and the Politics of Inequality, Ideology, and Legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 2008, vol. 41, no. 45, pp. 564599. DOI:10.1177/0010414007313113.
6. Brehm J., Rahn W. IndividualLevel Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of So cial Capital. American Journal of Political Science, 1997, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 9991023. DOI:10.2307/2111684.
7. Brunori P. The Perception of Inequality of Opportunity in Europe. Review of Income and Wealth, 2017, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 464491. DOI:10.1111/roiw.12259.
8. Catterberg G., Moreno A. The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Estab lished Democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2006, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3148. DOI:10.1093/ijpor/edh081.
9. Checchi D., Peragine V., Serlenga D. Inequality of Opportunity in Europe: Is There a Role for Institutions? In: Cappellari L., Polachek S. W., Tatsiramos K. (eds.). Inequality: Causes and Consequences. Bingley, Emerald Publishing, 2016, vol. 43, pp. 144.
10. Clarke H., Sanders D., Stewart M., Whiteley P. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004. DOI:10.1093/019924488X.001.0001.
11.
12. Duch R., Stevenson R. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008. DOI:10.1017/ CBO9780511755934.
13. Easton D. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1965.
14. Enders C., Tofighi D. Centering Predictor Variables in CrossSectional Multilevel Mod els: A New Look at an Old Issue. Psychological Methods, 2007, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 121138. DOI:10.1037/1082989X.12.2.121.
15. Feldman S. Economic SelfInterest and Political Behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 1982, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 446466. DOI:10.2307/2110937.
16. Ferreira F., Gignoux J. The Measurement of Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and an Ap plication to Latin America. Review of Income and Wealth, 2011, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 622657. DOI:10.1111/j.14754991.2011.00467.x.
17. Ferreira F., Peragine V. Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Evidence. Policy Research Working Paper, no. 7217, 2015.
18. Fiorina M. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT, Yale Uni versity Press, 1981.
19. Goubin S., Hooghe M. The Effect of Inequality on the Relation between Socioeconomic Stratification and Political Trust in Europe. Social Justice Research, 2020, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 219247. DOI:10.1007/s1121102000350z.
20. Gustavsson M., Jordahl H. Inequality and Trust in Sweden: Some Inequalities are More Harmful than Others. Journal of Public Economics, 2008, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 348365.
21. Hofmann D., Gavin M. Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations. Journal of Management, 1998, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 623641. DOI:10.1177/014920639802400504.
22. Hooghe M. Why There is Basically Only One Form of Political Trust. British Journal of Politics, 2011, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 269275. DOI:10.1111/j.1467856X.2010.00447.x.
23. Keele L. Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government. American Journal of Political Science, 2007, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 241254. DOI:10.1111/j.15405907.2007.00248.x.
24. Kiewiet D., LewisBeck M. No Man is an Island: SelfInterest, the Public Interest, and So ciotropic Voting. Critical Review, 2011, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 303319. DOI:10.1080/08913811. 2011.635868.
25. Kinder D., Kiewiet D. Sociotropic Politics: The American Case. British Journal of Political Science, 1981, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 129161.
26. Knack S., Keefer P. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A CrossCountry In vestigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 12511288. DOI:10.1162/003355300555475.
27. Krieckhaus J., Son B., Bellinger N., Wells J. Economic Inequality and Democratic Support. The Journal of Politics, 2013, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 139151. DOI:10.1017/s0022381613001229.
28. Lee D., Chang C., Hur H. Economic Performance, Income Inequality and Political Trust: New Evidence from a CrossNational Study of 14 Asian Countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 2020, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 6668. DOI:10.1080/23276665.2020. 1755873.
29. Levi M. Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam’s Making Democ racy Work. Politics and Society, 1996, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 4555. DOI:10.1177/00323292960 24001005.
30. Lockerbie B. Prospective Voting in Presidential Elections, 19561988. American Politics Research, 1992, vol. 20, no. 3. DOI:10.1177/1532673X9202000303.
31. Maas C. J. M., Hox J. J. Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling. Methodology European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2005, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 8692. DOI:10.1027/16142241.1.3.86.
32. McAllister I. The Economic Performance of Governments. In: Norris P. (ed.). Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance. New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
33. McNeish D. Small Sample Methods for Multilevel Modeling: A Colloquial Elucidation of REML and the KenwardRoger Correction. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2017, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 661670. DOI:10.1080/00273171.2017.1344538.
34. MedveBálint G., Boda Z. The Poorer You Are, the More You Trust? The Effect of Inequal ity and Income on Institutional Trust in EastCentral Europe. Sociologický Časopis, 2014, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 419453. DOI:10.13060/00380288.2014.50.3.104.
35. Möring K. The Fixed Effects Approach as Alternative to Multilevel Models for Cross‐Na tional Analyses. GK SOCLIFE Working Paper Series, no. 16/2012, 2012.
36. Nadeau R., LewisBeck M., Bélanger E. Economics and Elections Revisited. Comparative Political Studies, 2013, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 551573. DOI:10.1177/0010414012463877.
37. Niehues J., Peich A. Lower and Upper Bounds of Unfair Inequality: Theory and Evidence for Germany and the US. IZA Discussion Papers, no. 5834, 2011.
38. Oshchepkov A., Shirokanova A. Multilevel Modeling for Economists: Why, When and How. HSE Research Program Working Papers, Series: Economics, WP BRP 233/EC/2020, 2020.
39. Raudenbush S., Bryk A. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2002.
40. Roemer J. Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1998.
41. Roemer J., Trannoy A. Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement. Journal of Economic Literature, 2016, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 12881332. DOI:10.1257/jel.20151206.
42. Rothstein B. The Quality of Government. Corruption, Social Trust, and Inequality in International Perspective. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 2011.
43. Reutzel F. Inequality of Opportunity and Support for Democracy: Evidence from Transi tion Countries. EBRD Working Paper, no. 248, 2020.
44. Rueda D., Stegmueller D. The Externalities of Inequality: Fear of Crime and Preferences for Redistribution in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 2016, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 472489. DOI:10.1111/ajps.12212.
45. Sachweh P., Olafsdottir S. The Welfare State and Equality? Stratification Realities and As pirations in Three Welfare Regimes. European Sociological Review, 2012, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 149168. DOI:10.1093/esr/jcq055.
46. Schmalor A., Heine S. Subjective Economic Inequality Decreases Emotional Intelligence, Especially for People of High Social Class. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2022, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 210219. DOI:10.1177/1948550621996867.
47. Tukey J. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA, AddisonWesley, 1977.
48. Uslaner E. M. Corruption and Inequality Trap in Africa. Afrobarometer Working Paper, no. 69, 2007.
49. Uslaner E. M. Corruption, Inequality, and the Rule of Law: The Bulging Pocket Makes the Easy Life. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511510410.
50. Van Erkel P., Van der Meer T. Macroeconomic Performance, Political Trust and the Great Recession: A Multilevel Analysis of the Effects of WithinCountry Fluctuations in Macr oeconomic Performance on Political Trust in 15 EU Countries, 19992011. European Journal of Political Research, 2016, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 177197. DOI:10.1111/14756765.12115.
51. Van de Gaer D. Equality of Opportunity and Investment in Human Capital, PhD Disserta tion. Leuven, 1993.
52. Van der Meer T. In What We Trust? A MultiLevel Study into Trust in Parliament as an Evaluation of State Characteristics. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 2010, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 517536. DOI:10.1177/0020852310372450.
53. Van der Meer T., Hakhverdian A. Political Trust as the Evaluation of Process and Perform ance: A CrossNational Study of 42 European Countries. Political Studies, 2017, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 81102. DOI:10.1177/0032321715607514.
54. Van der Meer T., Te Grotenhuis M., Pelzer B. Influential Cases in Multilevel Modeling: A Methodological Comment. American Sociological Review, 2010, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 173 178. DOI:10.1177/0003122409359166.
55. Zak P. J., Knack S. Trust and Growth. The Economic Journal, 2001, vol. 111, no. 470, pp. 295 321. DOI:10.1111/14680297.00609.
56. Zmerli S., Castillo J. Income Inequality, Distributive Fairness and Political Trust in Latin Ameri ca. Social Science Research, 2015, vol. 52, pp. 179192. DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.003.
57. Zmerli S., Van der Meer T. (eds.). Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2017.
Review
For citations:
Ovchinnikov V.N. “Unfair” Inequality and Political Trust. Economic Policy. 2022;17(4):8-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-4-8-43
Views:
95
Email this article 