Is Venture Capital Interested in Sustainable Development Technologies? An Analysis of the Russian Market

The paper explores how the focus of Russian startups on investment in sustainable development technologies affects their attractiveness to venture capital investors. Venture capital plays a significant role in financing rapidly growing companies as they develop new technologies and thereby supports industries that drive economic growth. However, venture capital activity in recent years has been flagging both globally and in Russia. Sustainable development technologies mitigate environmental and social risks in the economy and in society and have been increasingly attractive to investors since the mid-2000s. The article analyzes to what extent sustainable development technologies may appeal to venture capital investors in the Russian market despite the current turbulent environment. The study used panel regression analysis of 850 venture capital deals concluded between 2018 and 2024 and found a significant relationship between a company’s focus on sustainable technologies and the amount of venture capital it raised. There was also a positive correlation with the probability of securing subsequent rounds of funding, which was also influenced by the age of the portfolio company. These findings show that mature companies can better integrate ESG principles and therefore become more attractive investments for venture capital. The study also indicated that syndicated investor participation in deals and the degree of innovation in the technology developed by a company had a positive impact on attractiveness to venture capital. The article is one of the first quantitative studies to explore the relationship between a company’s concentration on sustainable development technologies and the attention it receives from venture capital investors. As such, its findings may be of interest to researchers studying both sustainable development and venture capital, and they can also be utilized to enhance Russia’s venture capital market.

1. Alekseeva V., Sokolova T., Buravskiy K. Rol’ ESG-investitsiy na fondovom rynke [The Role of ESG Investments in the Financial Market]. In: Ustoychivoe razvitie (ESG): finansy, ekonomika, promyshlennost’: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Sustainable Development (ESG): Finance, Economy, Promotion: Materials of the Scientific-Practical Conference]. St. Petersburg, Asterion Center for Scientific and Production Technologies, 2022, pp. 437-441. (In Russ.)

2. Danilov Yu. A. Formirovanie dolgosrochnogo doveriya v ramkakh ustoychivykh finansov [Building Long-Term Trust in Sustainable Finance]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2023, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 122-147. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2023-5-122-147. (In Russ.)

3. Kolosnitsyna M. G., Filippova A. V. Detskie posobiya i bednost’ v Rossii [Child Benefits and Poverty: The Case of Russia]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2017, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 118-153. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2017-4-05. (In Russ.)

4. Kochkina A. V., Kelchevskaya N. R. Innovatsionnye startapy v Rossii: problemy funktsionirovaniya i osnovnye faktory uspekha [Innovative Start-Ups in Russia: Functioning Problems and Major Success Factors]. Innovatsii [Innovations], 2017, no. 2(220), pp. 48-54. (In Russ.)

5. Kudina M. V., Kasymov A. Sh. Venchurnyy kapital v usloviyakh ESG-transformatsii [Venture Capital in the Context of ESG Transformation]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyy vestnik [Public Administration. E-Journal], 2022, no. 93, pp. 22-34. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2022-93-22-37. (In Russ.)

6. Lebedev V. A., Andreeva A. I., Mamedov T. N. Venchurnye investitsii kak faktor razvitiya ekonomiki Rossii v usloviyakh pandemii [Venture Investments as a Factor in the Development of the Russian Economy in a Pandemic]. Finansy i upravlenie [Finance and Management], 2022, no. 1, pp. 47-57. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7802.2022.1.37318. (In Russ.)

7. Murach A. A., Storchevoy M. A., Sepulveda M. Raskhozhdenie reytingov ESG: mezhdunarodnyy i rossiyskiy opyt [Divergence of ESG Ratings: International and Russian Experience]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2024, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 84-121. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2023-5-122-147. (In Russ.)

8. Nekhorosheva L. N. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo kak instrument razvitiya innovatsionnoy i venchurnoy deyatel’nosti [State-Private Partnership as New Model of Developing Innovative and Venture Activities]. Problemy upravleniya: nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal (Minsk) [Problems of Control. Theoretical and Practical Journal (Minsk)], 2011, no. 2, pp. 53-63. (In Russ.)

9. Publichnye razmeshсheniya i predlozheniya aktsiy: itogi 2024 goda. Informatsionno-analiticheskiy material [Pubic Offerings and Share Issues: Results for 2024]. Bank of Russia, 2025. https://cbr.ru/Collection/Collection/File/55526/IPO_review_2024.pdf. (In Russ.)

10. Alkaraan F., Albitar K., Hussainey K., Venkatesh V. Corporate Transformation Toward Industry 4.0 and Financial Performance: The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, no. 175, article 121423. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423.

11. Alpaslan C., Green S., Mitroff I. Corporate Governance in the Context of Crises: Towards a Stakeholder Theory of Crisis Management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2009, no. 17, pp. 38-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2009.00555.x.

12. Amankwah G., Abonge H. Investigating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Considerations in Venture Capital & Private Equity Firms: A Study in US and UK Venture Capital Industry, master’s thesis. Umeå: Umeå School of Business, 2011. https://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:428672/FULLTEXT02.pdf.

13. Asrar-Ul-Haq M., Kuchinke K., Iqbal A. The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment: Case of Pakistani Higher Education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 2352-2363.

14. Badri A., Boudreau-Trudel B., Souissi A. Occupational Health and Safety in the Industry 4.0 Era: A Cause for Major Concern. Safety Science, 2018, no. 109, pp. 403-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.06.012.

15. Barnett M., Salomon R. Does It Pay to Be Really Good? Addressing The Shape of the Relationship Between Social and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1304-1320. DOI: 10.1002/smj.1980.

16. Braedon L., Anderson C., Bickham C., Horman J., Overly A., Gentry C. C., King J. Generation Z Perceptions of a Positive Workplace Environment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2021, vol. 33, pp. 171-187. DOI: 10.1007/s10672-021-09366-2.

17. Bruna M., Loprevite S., Raucci D., Ricca B., Rupo D. Investigating the Marginal Impact of ESG Results on Corporate Financial Performance. Finance Research Letters, 2022, vol. 47, part A, article 10828. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102828.

18. Casamatta C., Haritchabalet C. Experience, Screening and Syndication in Venture Capital Investments. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2007, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 368-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2007.03.003.

19. CB Insights State of Venture Global. 2024 recap. New York, CB Insights, 2025. https://www.cbinsights.com/reports/CB-Insights_Venture-Report-2024.pdf.

20. Chouaibi S., Chouaibi J., Rossi M. ESG and Corporate Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation: UK Common Law Versus German Civil Law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 2022, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 46-71. DOI: 10.1108/EMJB-09-2020-0101.

21. De Silva C., Bosio A. O., Gervasoni A. ESG and Venture Capital Research: A Bibliometric Literature Review at the Intersection of Two Fields. Corporate Ownership & Control, 2024, vol. 21, no. 1, рр. 55-71. DOI: 10.22495/cocv21i1art6.

22. Dong W., Li Y., Lv X., Yu C. How Does Venture Capital Spur the Innovation of Environmentally Friendly Firms? Evidence From China. Energy Economics, 2021, vol. 103, article 105582. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105582.

23. Drobetz W., El Ghoul S., Guedhami O., Hackmann J., Momtaz P. Entrepreneurial Finance and Sustainability: Do Institutional Investors Impact the ESG Performance of SMEs? Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 2024, vol. 22, article e00498. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00498.

24. Dunbar P. Starting Up: Responsible Investment in Venture Capital. UN Principles for Responsible Investment Initiative, 2020. https://www.unpri.org/download?ac=15607.

25. From Adversity to Agility: 20+ Years Private Equity Confidence Survey Central Europe. Deloitte, 2023. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ce/Documents/privateequity/ce-pe-confidence-survey-report-winter-2023.pdf.

26. Gangi F., Meles A., Monferrà S., Mustilli M. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Help the Survivorship of SMEs and Large Firms? Global Finance Journal, 2020, vol. 43, article 100402. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2018.01.006.

27. Gilchrist A. Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things. Berkeley, CA, Apress Berkeley, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4842-2047-4.

28. Grilli L., Latifi G., Mrkajic B. Institutional Determinants of Venture Capital Activity: An Empirically Driven Literature Review and a Research Agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2019, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1094-1122. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12319.

29. Growing the Seeds of ESG: Venture Capital, Start-Ups and the Need for Sustainability. Frankfurt am Main, BCG and KfW Capital, 2021. https://www.kfw-capital.de/Dokumente/ESG-Report-ESG-s%C3%A4en-Nachhaltigkeit-ernten-(Nov.-2021).pdf.

30. Hoechle D. Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions With Cross-Sectional Dependence. The Stata Journal, 2007, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 281-312. DOI: 10.1177/1536867X0700700301.

31. Lange E., Banadaki M. ESG Consideration in Venture Capital: Drivers, Strategies and Barriers. Studies in Economics and Finance, 2023, preprint. DOI: 10.1108/SEF-06-2023-0380.

32. Lerner J. The Syndication of Venture Capital Investments. Financial Management, 1994, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 16-27. DOI: 10.2307/3665618.

33. Lian Y., Li Y., Cao H. How Does Corporate ESG Performance Affect Sustainable Development: A Green Innovation Perspective. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, vol. 11, article 1170582. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1170582.

34. Lin L. Venture Capital in the Rise of Sustainable Investment. European Business Organization Law Review, 2022, vol. 23, pp. 187-216. DOI: 10.1007/s40804-021-00238-8.

35. Lin L. Venture Capital Law in China. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2021. DOI: 10.1017/9781108528795.

36. Lingelbach D. Paradise Postponed? Venture Capital Emergence in Russia. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 2013, vol. 9, no. 1/2, pp. 204-225. DOI: 10.1108/17422041311300001.

37. Markowitz H. Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 1952, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77-91.

38. McCahery J., Pudschedl P., Steindl M. Institutional Investors, Alternative Asset Managers, and ESG Preferences. European Business Organization Law Review, 2022, vol. 23, pp. 821868. DOI: 10.1007/s40804-022-00264-0.

39. Mohamed M. Challenges and Benefits of Industry 4.0: An Overview. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 2018, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 256-265. DOI: 10.22034/2018.3.7.

40. Momtaz P., Parra I. Is Sustainable Entrepreneurship Profi able? ESG Disclosure and the Financial Performance of SMEs. Small Business Economics, 2024, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 15351564. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-024-00981-5.

41. Popkova E., Saveleva N., Sozinova A. A New Quality of Economic Growth in “Smart” Economy: Advantages for Developing Countries. In: Popkova E., Sergi B. (eds.). “Smart Technologies” for Society, State and Economy. ISC 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 155. Cham, Springer, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59126-7_48.

42. Prisco M. The Impact of ESG Considerations on Private Equity and Venture Capital Transactions: The Western Scenario. Business Law International, 2024, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5-22.

43. Ribando J., Bonne G. A New Quality Factor: Finding Alpha With ASSET4 ESG Data. Starmine Research Note, 2010, no. 31, pp. 1-8. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/openweb/documents/pdf/tr-com-fi ancial/report/starmine-quant-research-note-on-asset4-data.pdf.

44. Wang J., Ke Y., Shen Y. Venture Capital and ESG Performance: Hindrance or Help? Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 2023, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 259-274. DOI: 10.24818/18423264/57.4.23.16.

45. Wang R. ESG Integration Into Venture Capital in the UK. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2024, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 123-153. DOI: 10.47260/jafb/1417.

46. Whelan T., Atz U., Van Holt T., Clark C. ESG and Financial Performance: Uncovering the Relationship by Aggregating Evidence From 1,000 Plus Studies Published Between 20152020. New York, NYU Stern Centre for Sustainable Business, 2021. https://www.stern.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/assets/documents/NYU-RAM_ESG-Paper_2021%20Rev_0.pdf.

47. Zairis G., Liargovas P., Apostolopoulos N. Sustainable Finance and ESG Importance: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, no. 7, article 2878. DOI: 10.3390/su16072878.