Preview

Economic Policy

Advanced search

Access to Data in the Digital Economy: Recommendations, Initiatives, Prospects

https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-4-76-99

Abstract

This article assesses how compatible Russia’s legal regime for digital data is with the implementation of international standards and best practices. Data is a key resource for developing a digital economy, and therefore the conditions provided for access to data and data sharing become factors in the well-being of an information society and in the qualitative development of competitive digital markets. As an illustration of the applicable international standards, the article provides legal analysis of the OECD Recommendation on Enhancing Access to and Sharing of Data from 2021, which is concerned primarily with ensuring the trustworthiness of the data ecosystem; and the essential element for that is a reliable legal regime protecting data. Governments should therefore provide balanced measures for facilitating both access to and sharing of data in order to allow more freedom for data to circulate while maintaining the legal guarantees of the data regimes. As an illustration of the best international regulatory practices, the article analyzes the recently adopted EU Data Governance Act, which addresses three main topics: the reuse of protected data in the public sector, the configuration of providers of data sharing services, and the introduction of what is termed data altruism. The authors examine the main gaps and shortcomings in Russian legislation pertaining to personal data in order to identify ways in which implementation of international standards and practices might be hindered. The article concludes with the authors’ argument that amendments to Federal Law No. 152 “On Personal Data” are necessary to improve the ability of personal data subjects to manage their data, as this is an essential condition for the development of a trustworthy data ecosystem in Russia.

About the Authors

A. A. Koval
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Alexandra A. Koval – Researcher, Center Russia—OECD 

82, Vernadskogo pr., 119571, Moscow



A. D. Levashenko
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Antonina D. Levashenko – Head, Center Russia—OECD 

82, Vernadskogo pr., 119571, Moscow

 



O. S. Magomedova
Russian Foreign Trade Academy of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Olga S. Magomedova – Analytic, Center of Responsible Business Conduct 

6a, Vorobevskoe sh., 119285, Moscow



References

1. Abramova A. G. Sovremennye problemy osushchestvleniya zashchity personal’nykh dannykh v seti: osnovopolagayushchie printsipy zashchity personal’nykh dannykh [Modern Problems in Personal Data Protection on the Internet: Fundamental Principles of Personal Data Protection]. Region i mir [Region and World], 2020, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 21-25. (In Russ.)

2. Bembeeva B. S. Pravo na zashchitu personal’nykh dannykh i razlichnye kategorii personal’nykh dannykh [The Right to Protection of Personal Data and Different Categories of Data]. In: Rozhkova M. A. (ed.). Pravo v sfere Interneta: sbornik statey [Law Concerning the Internet: A Collection of Essays]. Moscow, Statut, 2018, pp. 48-61. (In Russ.)

3. Gadelshin A. A., Stepanov M. M. Cookie-fayly kak ob’’ekt personal’nykh dannykh i sposob narusheniya konfidentsial’nosti personal’nykh dannykh [Cookie-Files as an Object of Personal Data and a Method for Breaching Privacy]. Voprosy rossiykoy yustitsii [Questions of Russian Justice], 2021, no. 16, pp. 516-531. (In Russ.)

4. Mamykina E. V. Pravovoy status sub’’ektov, uchastvuyushchikh v personal’nykh dannykh: sub’’ekt personal’nykh dannykh; operator personal’nykh dannykh [The Legal Status of Participants in Data Circulation: Personal Data Holder; Personal Data Operator]. Moya professional’naya kar’era [My Professional Career], 2020, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 117-122. (In Russ.)

5. Petrenko V. I., Sukhovey D. N. Mekhanizm podachi uvedomleniya reguliruyushchemu organu i sub’’ektu personal’nykh dannykh v svyazi s narusheniem bezopasnosti personal’nykh dannykh [Method for Submitting Notification Concerning Violation of Personal Data Security to a Regulatory Body and to the Personal Data Subject]. Naukoemkie tekhnologii v kosmicheskikh issledovaniyakh Zemli [Science-Driven Technologies in Space Research of the Earth], 2012, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 23-25. (In Russ.)

6. Braun C., Busuioc M. Stakeholder Engagement as a Conduit for Regulatory Legitimacy? Journal of European Public Policy, 2020, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1599-1611. DOI:10.1080/13501 763.2020.1817133.

7. Busuioc M., Jevnaker T. EU Agencies’ Stakeholder Bodies: Vehicles of Enhanced Control, Legitimacy or Bias? Journal of European Public Policy, 2022, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 155-175. DOI:10.1080/13501763.2020.1821750.

8. Graef I., Prüfer J. Governance of Data Sharing: A Law & Economics Proposal. Research Policy, 2021, vol. 50, no. 9. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104330.

9. Hansen M. Towards Measuring Maturity of Privacy-Enhancing Technologies. In: Berendt B., Engel T., Ikonomou D., Le Métayer D., Schiffner S. (eds.). Privacy Technologies and Policy: Third Annual Privacy Forum, APF 2015. New York, NY, Springer, 2016, pp. 3-20.

10. Koops E. J. Should ICT Regulation Be Technology-Neutral? In: Koops B. J., Lips A. M. B., Prins J. E. J., Schellekens M. H. M. (eds.). Starting Points for ICT Regulation. The Hague, TMC Asser Press, 2006, pp. 77-108.

11. Lovelock P. Framing Policies for the Digital Economy: Towards Policy Frameworks in the Asia-Pacific. Singapore, UNDP Global Centre for Public Excellence, 2018.

12. Park K. B., Kang M. South Korea Data Protection Overview. 2021. https://www.dataguidance.com/notes/south-korea-data-protection-overview.

13. Reinsel D., Gantz G., Rydning J. The Digitalization of the World: From Edge to Core. 2018. https://www.seagate.com/files/www-content/our-story/trends/files/idc-seagate-dataage- whitepaper.pdf.

14. Shabani M. The Data Governance Act and the EU’s Move Towards Facilitating Data Sharing. Molecular Systems Biology, 2021, vol. 17, no. 3, 2021. DOI:10.15252/msb.202110229.

15. Shimpo F. The Principal Japanese AI and Robot Strategy Towards Establishing Basic Principles. In: Barfield W., Pagallo U. (eds.). Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 114-142.

16. Tusikov N., Haggart B. Implementing a National Data Strategy: The Need for Innovative Public Consultations. 2020. https://www.g20-insights.org/policy_briefs/implementing-a- national-data-strategy-the-need-for-innovative-public-consultations/.

17. Ursic H., Nurullaev R., Cuevas M., Szulewski P. Data Localisation Measures and Their Impacts on Data Science. In: Mak V., Tjon Tjin Tai E., Berlee A. (eds.). Research Handbook in Data Science and Law. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 322-353. DOI:10. 4337/9781788111300.00021.

18. Veil W. Data Altruism: How the EU is Screwing up a Good Idea. 2022. https://algorithmwatch.org/en/eu-and-data-donations/.


Review

For citations:


Koval A.A., Levashenko A.D., Magomedova O.S. Access to Data in the Digital Economy: Recommendations, Initiatives, Prospects. Economic Policy. 2022;17(4):76-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-4-76-99

Views: 216


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-5124 (Print)
ISSN 2411-2658 (Online)