Vocational Education and Training of Russian Employees
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-4-118-141
Abstract
A well-developed system of vocational education and training (VET) is a prerequisite for sustainable economic growth, and it is becoming even more important because of technological and structural changes in the Russian economy, labor shortages, and a persistent imbalance between the supply and demand for labor. The article employs the Labor Force Survey to analyze various types of workbased VET. Although the average percentage of workers who have completed vocational education (27.1% in 2023) is comparable to that of European countries, VET in Russia is mostly limited to training in occupational safety and health. Other kinds of instruction, such as short-term courses and trainings, professional development and retraining programs, and the study of new technologies, are much less common and reach no more than 11% of workers. The number of participants in VET and the training they undergo vary considerably from one industry or occupation to another. Occupational safety and health training is nearly the only kind provided in manufacturing industries for both skilled and unskilled workers. The other types of VET are most common in industries that require more intellectual skills (education, healthcare, finance and insurance, information and communications, professional and scientific employment) and among specialists. The main determinants of participation in VET revealed by applying logit regression are occupational and industry factors along with the nature of labor relations. Restricting vocational training to occupational safety and health (especially for manual labor) coupled with a paucity of other training aimed at the renewal of skills and acquisition of new competencies may hinder Russia in its attempt to advance the technical and technological modernization of its economy, overcome its labor shortage, and increase labor productivity. Those goals require reforms in the way continuing occupational education is carried out.
Supporting agencies: This article has been prepared as part of the RANEPA state assignment research program.
About the Authors
V. Yu. Lyashok
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victor Yu. Lyashok – Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Lead Research Fellow, Institute of Social Analysis and Forecasting, Institute of Applied Economic Research
84, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571
E. Ya. Varshavskaya
HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena Ya. Varshavskaya – Doctor Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Department of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Graduate School of Business
26–28, Shabolovka ul., Moscow, 119049
References
1. Avraamova E. M., Klyachko T. L., Loginov D. M. Monitoring nepreryvnogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya: pozitsii rabotodateley i rabotnikov [Monitoring of Continuing Vocational Education: Perspectives of Employers and Employees]. Moscow, Delo, 2015. (In Russ.)
2. Aistov A. V., Aleksandrova E. A. Otsenki individual’noy otdachi ot dopolnitelnogo professional’nogo obucheniya primer promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Individual Returns to Training: Evidence From Russian Firm]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 2014, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 56-79. (In Russ.)
3. Belyakov S. A., Karavay A. V., Polushkina E. A. Dopolnitel’noe professional’noe obrazovanie [Continuing Vocational Education]. Moscow, Delo, 2017. (In Russ.)
4. Bondarenko N. V. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie vzroslogo naseleniya v Rossii: vovlechennost’, istochniki finansirovaniya i osnovnye effekty ot uchastiya [Lifelong Learning of the Adult in Russia: Involvement, Funding Sources and Main Effects of Participation]. Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2018. (In Russ.)
5. Korshunov I. A., Frumin I. D. (eds.). Vek zhivi vek uchis’: nepreryvnoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Live and Learn: Lifelong Education in Russia]. Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2019. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-1779-6. (In Russ.)
6. Gimpelson V. E. Vozrast i zarabotnaya plata: stilizovannye fakty i rossiyskie osobennosti [Age and Wage: Stylized Facts and Russian Evidence]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal VShE [HSE Economic Journal], 2019, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 185-237. (In Russ.)
7. Gimpelson V. E. Nuzhny li nashey promyshlennosti kvalifitsirovannye rabotniki? Istoriya poslednego desyatiletiya [Does Our Industry Need Skilled Workers? The History of the Last Decade]. In: Gimpelson V., Kapekyushnikov R. (eds.) Rossiyskiy rabotnik: obrazovanie, professiya, kvalifikatsiya [Russian Worker: Education, Profession, Qualifications]. Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2011, pp. 405-461. (In Russ.)
8. Didenko D. V., Dorofeeva Z. E. Dopolnitel’noe professional’noe obrazovanie v Rossii: dinamika masshtabov i ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti (2000-2013) [Adult Education in Russia: Dynamics of Scale and Economic Efficiency (2000-2013)]. Mir Rossii [Universe of Russia], 2016, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 87-114. (In Russ.)
9. Karavay A. V. Vklyuchennost’ rabotayushchikh rossiyan v poluchenie dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Participation of Russian Workers in Continuing Professional Education]. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2016, no. 4, pp. 123-143. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-4-123-143. (In Russ.)
10. Kicherova M. N., Efimova G. Z. Vliyanie neformal’nogo obrazovaniya na chelovecheskiy kapital: pokolencheskiy podkhod [The Impact of Non-Formal Education on Human Capital: A Generational Approach]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya [Integration of Education], 2020, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 316-338. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.099.024.202002.316-338. (In Russ.)
11. Lazareva O. V., Denisova I. A., Tsukhlo S. V. Podgotovka na proizvodstve: rossiyskiy opyt [On-The-Job Training: Russian Experience]. In: Gimpelson V., Kapekyushnikov R. (eds.). Rossiyskiy rabotnik: obrazovanie, professiya, kvalifikatsiya [Russian Worker: Education, Profession, Qualifications]. Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2011, pp. 462-515. (In Russ.)
12. Lyz N. A., Gladkaya E. V. Nepreryvnoe obuchenie v mnogotselevoy aktivnosti samozanyatykh i rabotayushchikh po naymu lits [Lifelong Learning in Multi-Purpose Activity of Self-Employed and Employed Persons]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya [Integration of Education], 2024, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 266-281. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.115.028.202402.266-281. (In Russ.)
13. Popova I. P. Dopolnitel’noe obrazovanie kak kanal professional’noy mobil’nosti [Continuing Professional Education as a Channel for Professional Mobility]. In: Klyucharev G. A. (ed.). Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie v politicheskom i ekonomicheskom kontekstakh [Lifelong Learning in Political and Economic Contexts]. Moscow, ISRAS, 2008, pp. 120-133. (In Russ.)
14. Prokhoda V. A. Vklyuchennost’ v dopolnitel’noe professional’noe obrazovanie zhiteley evropeyskikh gosudarstv [Participation in Continuing Professional Education of Residents of European Countries]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 2017, no. 4, pp. 22-33. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2017.4.3. (In Russ.)
15. Roshchina Ya. M., Russkikh I. S. Strategii rabotodateley v sfere obucheniya personala v 2007, 2009 i 2010 godakh [Employers’ Strategies in the Personnel Training in 2007, 2009 and 2010]. Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya [Monitoring of the Economics of Education]. Newsletter no. 7(54). Moscow, HSE Publishing House, 2011. (In Russ.)
16. Seryakova S. B., Kravchenko V. V. Dopolnitel’noe professional’noe obrazovanie v Rossii i stranakh Zapadnoy Evropy: sopostavitel’nyy analiz [Continuing Professional Education in Russia and Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis]. Moscow, Prometey, 2016. (In Russ.)
17. Slobodenyuk E. D., Karavay A. V., Mareeva S. V. Vklyuchennost’ rossiyan v obrazovatel’nye praktiki, formiruyushchie chelovecheskiy kapital [Participation of Russians in Educational Practices Forming Human Capital]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes], 2024, no. 4, pp. 148-169. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2024.4.2570. (In Russ.)
18. Travkin P. V. Vovlechennost’ sotrudnikov v programmy dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obucheniya v Rossii [Participation of Employees in Continuing Professional Training Programs in Russia]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management], 2014a, no. 2, pp. 33-41. (In Russ.)
19. Travkin P. V. Dopol’nitelnoe professional’noe obrazovanie v Rossii: vliyanie na zarabotnuyu platu rabotnikov [Continuing Professional Education in Russia: Its Impact on Employee Wages]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management], 2013, no. 1, pp. 111-118. (In Russ.)
20. Travkin P. V. Otsenka otdachi ot dopolnitel’nogo professional’nogo obucheniya rossiyskikh rabotnikov: podkhod s uchetom vliyaniya sposobnostey na zarabotnuyu platu [The Impact of the On-The-Job Training on Russian Worker’s Salary: The Effect of Abilities Approach]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 2014b, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 51-70. (In Russ.)
21. Tuguskina G. N., Rozhkova L. V., Naydenova D. I., Supikov V. N., Seidov Sh. G. Dopolnitel’noe professional’noe obrazovanie kak uslovie povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti spetsialistov na rynke truda [Continuing Education as a Condition for Increasing Specialists’ Competitiveness in the Labor Market]. Integratsiya obrazovaniya [Integration of Education], 2022, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 111-129. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.106.026.202201.111-129. (In Russ.)
22. Bainbridge S., Serafin M. Measuring Participation in Adult Learning: New Targets, Methods and Data. Cedefop Data Insight, September 2024.
23. Kalenda J., Kočvarová I., Vaculíková J. Determinants of Participation in Nonformal Education in the Czech Republic. Adult Education Quarterly, 2020, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 99-118. DOI: 10.1177/0741713619878391.
24. Lischewski J., Seeber S., Wuttke E., Rosemann T. What Influences Participation in NonFormal and Informal Modes of Continuous Vocational Education and Training? An Analysis of Individual and Institutional Influencing Factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, vol. 11, article 534485. DOI: 10/3389/fpsyg.2020.534485.
25. Park S., Lee J. Y. Workplace Learning Measures for Human Resource Development: Review and Summary. Industrial and Commercial Training, 2018, vol. 50, no. 7/8, pp. 420-431. DOI: 10.1108/ICT-08-2018-0068.
26. Roshchin S., Travkin P. Determinants of On-The-Job Training in Enterprises: The Russian Case. European Journal of Training and Development, 2017, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 758-775. DOI: 10.1108/EJTD-05-2017-0050.
27. Sekmokas M., Larsson L., Roberts A., Von Erlach E., Guo Y., González G. R. Updated Framework for Monitoring Adult Learning: Enhancing Data Identification and Indicator Selection. OECD, Working Paper no. 317, 2024. DOI: 10.1787/02bbacdc-en.
28. Travkin P., Sharunina A. The Returns to Training in Russia: A Difference-In-Differences Analysis. International Journal of Training and Development, 2016, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 262279. DOI: 10.1111/ijtd.12088.
29. Vaculíková J., Kalenda J., Kočvarová I. Participation in Non-Formal Adult Education Within the European Context: Examining Multilayer Approach. Frontiers in Education, 2024, vol. 9, article 1380865. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1380865.
Review
For citations:
Lyashok V.Yu., Varshavskaya E.Ya. Vocational Education and Training of Russian Employees. Economic Policy. 2025;20(4):118-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2025-4-118-141
Views:
44
Email this article 