Electricity Sector Reform Experience in the Context of Economic Theory
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-3-8-43
Abstract
History of reforms in the electricity sector spans over 40 years and a large number of countries. Following acquired experience and its analysis, changes were seen both in approaches to reforms’ organization in practice and in the theoretical underpinning of various elements of reforms. The paper aims at analyzing the main elements of electricity sector reforms in the context of their theoretical grounding, theoretically expected results and those achieved in practice as well as evolution of electricity sector reform approaches accounting for acquired experience. In their paper the authors provide classification of electricity sector reform models and of relevant research literature, and analyze reform experience in different segments of the electricity sector, namely: privatization and introduction of competition in generation; wholesale markets and their role in preventing market power abuse; ways to ensure appropriate investments in generation; various legal forms of system operators in energy transmission; and importance and questions of effective work of retail electricity markets. A separate section deals with the influence of renewables on optimal structure of the electricity sector. The analysis demonstrates a multiplicity of approaches to reforms of the electricity sector. Though the main elements of reforms (split of the sector into segments based on activities, restructuring and introduction of competition in generation, and creation of an independent system operator) were similar in many countries, realization of these elements in practice, their sequence and resulting organizational structures of the sector differed substantially. Thus, there is no unique most effective reform scheme—on the contrary, each country had its very own reform. The studied experience also suggests that electricity reform in any country has no end since social and technological changes demand constant reconsideration of the main principles of electricity markets, functioning in search of more effective and efficient mechanisms of management in all segments of the electricity sector.
Keywords
market creation,
regulation,
international experience,
natural monopoly,
competition,
renewable energy sources
JEL: L22, L94, L98, P28
About the Authors
Yu. V. Vymyatnina
European University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia V. Vymyatnina - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor
at St. Petersburg
E. N. Karaseva
European University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina N. Karaseva - Doctoral Student
at St. Petersburg
I. А. Sloev
European University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor А. Sloev - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor
at St. Petersburg
References
1. Aboumahboub T., Schaber K., Tzscheutschler P., Hamacher T. Optimization of the Utilization of Renewable Energy Sources in the Electricity Sector. In: Proceedings of the 5th IASME/ WSEAS International Conference on Energy & Environment, 2010, pp. 196-204.
2. Albertsen L. H., Andersen M., Boscán L. B., Santos A. Q. Implementing Dynamic Electricity Taxation in Denmark. Energy Policy, 2020, vol. 143(C). DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111543.
3. Allaz B., Vila J.-L. Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 1993, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1-16.
4. Almeida E. L. F., Pinto H. Q. Jr. Driving Forces of the Brazilian Electricity Industry Reform. Energy Studies Review, 1999, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 50-65. DOI:10.15173/esr.v9i2.411.
5. Amundsen E. S., Bergman L. Why Has the Nordic Electricity Market Worked So Well? Utilities Policy, 2006, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 148-157. DOI:10.1016/j.jup.2006.01.001.
6. Anaya K. L. The Restructuring and Privatisation of the Peruvian Electricity Distribution Market. EPRG Working Paper / Cambridge Working Paper in Economics, no. 1009/1017, 2010. DOI:10.17863/CAM.1121.
7. Blumsack S., Perekhodtsev D. Electricity Retail Competition and Pricing: An International Review. In: Evans J., Hunt L. C. (eds.). International Handbook on the Economics of Energy. L., Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009, pp. 663-684.
8. Blumstein C., Friedman L. S., Green R. The History of Electricity Restructuring in California. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2002, vol. 2, no. 1-2, pp. 9-38. DOI:10.1023/A:1020822720063.
9. Borggrefe F., Neuhoff K. Balancing and Intraday Market Design: Options for Wind Integration. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper, no. 1162, 2011.
10. Boroumand R. H., Zachmann G. Retailers’ Risk Management and Vertical Arrangements in Electricity Markets. Energy Policy, 2012, vol. 40(C), pp. 465-472. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.041.
11. Chester L. Who Benefits from the Restructuring of the Australian Electricity Sector? Journal of Economic Issues, 2007, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 981-1001. DOI:10.1080/00213624.2007.11507084.
12. Christensen L. R., Greene W. H. Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation. Journal of Political Economy, 1976, vol. 84, no. 4, part 1, pp. 655-676. DOI:10.1086/260470.
13. Coase R. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, vol. 3, pp. 1-44. DOI:10.1086/466560.
14. Cretì A., Fontini F. Economics of Electricity: Markets, Competition and Rules. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
15. Dahl C. International Energy Markets: Understanding Pricing, Policies, and Profits. Nashville, TN, Pennwell Corporation, 2015.
16. De Vos K. Negative Wholesale Electricity Prices in the German, French and Belgian Day-Ahead, Intra-Day and Real-Time Markets. The Electricity Journal, 2015, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 36-50. DOI:10.1016/j.tej.2015.04.001.
17. Deng S. J., Oren S. S. Electricity Derivatives and Risk Management. Energy, 2006, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 940-953. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2005.02.015.
18. Domah P., Pollitt M. G. The Restructuring and Privatisation of the Electricity Distribution and Supply Businesses in England and Wales: A Social Cost‐Benefit Analysis. Fiscal Studies, 2001, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 107-146. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2001.tb00036.x.
19. Feibelman A., Britt M. Are Utility Economies of Scale Real, or a Mirage? 2012. https:// www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/global/en/files/archive/2012/LONUTL91501-001_.pdf.
20. Grubb M., Newbery D. UK Electricity Market Reform and the Energy Transition: Emerging Lessons. The Energy Journal, 2018, vol. 39, no. 6. DOI:10.5547/01956574.39.6.mgru.
21. Han L., Han B., Shi X., Su B., Lv X., Lei X. Energy Efficiency Convergence Across Countries in the Context of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Applied Energy, 2018, vol. 213, pp. 112-122. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.030.
22. Hogan S., Meade R. Vertical Integration and Market Power in Electricity Markets. The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation’s Working Paper Series, no. 3959, 2007.
23. Hogan W. W. Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1992, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 211-242. DOI:10.1007/BF00133621.
24. Vertical Integration: Lessons for Telecommunications from Electricity Reforms. Telecommunications Policy, 2010, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 392-403.
25. Hunt S., Shuttleworth G. Competition and Choice in Electricity. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley and Sons, 1996.
26. Jargstorf J., De Jonghe C., Belmans R. Assessing the Reflectivity of Residential Grid Tariffs for a User Reaction Through Photovoltaics and Battery Storage. Sustainable Energy Grids Networks, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 85-98. DOI:10.1016/j.segan.2015.01.003.
27. Joskow P. L. Competitive Electricity Markets and Investment in New Generating Capacity. AEI-Brookings Joint Center Working Paper, no. 06-14, 2006.
28. Joskow P. L. The Difficult Transition to Competitive Electricity Markets in the US. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research’s Working Paper, 2003.
29. Joskow P. L., Kahn E. A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California’s Wholesale Electricity Market During Summer 2000. The Energy Journal, 2002, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1-36. DOI:10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol23-No4-1.
30. Joskow P., Tirole J. Reliability and Competitive Electricity Markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2007, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 60-84. DOI:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2007.tb00044.x.
31. Khalid O. Exploring the Market for Demand-Side Response, 2016. https://www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/O.Khalid.pdf.
32. Knopf B., Nahmmacher P., Schmid E. The European Renewable Energy Target for 2030: An Impact Assessment of the Electricity Sector. Energy Policy, 2015, vol. 85(C), pp. 50-60. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.010.
33. Kungl G. Stewards or Sticklers for Change? Incumbent Energy Providers and the Politics of the German Energy Transition. Energy Research and Social Science, 2015, vol. 8, pp. 13-23. DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2015.04.009.
34. Mansur E. T., White M. Market Organization and Efficiency in Electricity Markets. Yale School of Management Working Paper, 2009.
35. Michaels R. J. Vertical Integration and the Restructuring of the U.S. Electricity Industry. SSRN Working Paper, no. 595565, 2004.
36. Morales J. M., Conejo A. J., Madsen H., Pinson P., Zugno M. Integrating Renewables in Electricity Markets. Berlin, Springer, 2014.
37. Mota R. L. The Restructuring and Privatisation of Electricity Distribution and Supply Business in Brazil: A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, no. 0309, 2004.
38. Nagayama H. Impacts on Investments, and Transmission/Distribution Loss Through Power Sector Reforms. Energy Policy, 2010, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 3453-3467. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.019.
39. Nagayama H., Kashiwagi T. Evaluating Electricity Sector Reforms in Argentina: Lessons for Developing Countries? Journal of Cleaner Production, 2007, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 115-130. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.056.
40. Neuhoff K., Barquin J., Bialek J. W., Boyd R., Dent C. J., Echavarren F., Grau T., Von Hirschhausen C., Hobbs B., Kunz F., Nabe C., Papaefthymiou G., Weber C., Weigtet H. Renewable Electric Energy Integration: Quantifying the Value of Design of Markets for International Transmission Capacity. Energy Economics, 2013, vol. 40(C), pp. 760-772. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.004.
41. Newbery D. M. Electricity Liberalization in Britain: The Quest for a Satisfactory Wholesale Market Design. The Energy Journal, 2005, vol. 26, pp. 1-29.
42. Newbery D. M. Issues and Options for Restructuring Electricity Supply Industries. Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School Working Paper, no. EP01, 2002.
43. Newbery D. M. Towards a Green Energy Economy? The EU Energy Union’s Transition to a Low-Carbon Zero Subsidy Electricity System - Lessons from the UK’s Electricity Market Reform. Applied Energy, 2016, vol. 179(C), pp. 1321-1330. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.046.
44. Newbery D. M., Strbac G., Viehoff I. The Benefits of Integrating European Electricity Markets. Energy Policy, 2016, vol. 94(C), pp. 253-263. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.047.
45. Pfaffenberger W., Chrischilles E. Chapter 4. Turnaround in Rough Sea - Electricity Market in Germany. In: Sioshansi F. P. (ed.). Evolution of Global Electricity Markets: New Paradigms, New Challenges, New Approaches. L., Academic Press, 2013, pp. 93-123. DOI:10.1016/B978- 0-12-397891-2.00004-3.
46. Pollitt M. G. Electricity Reform in Argentina: Lessons for Developing Countries. Energy Economics, 2008a, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1536-1567.
47. Pollitt M. G. Electricity Reform in Chile. Lessons for Developing Countries. Journal of Network Industries, 2004, vol. 5, no. 3-4, pp. 221-262. DOI:10.1177/178359170400500301.
48. Pollitt M. G. Reforming the Chinese Electricity Supply Sector. Berlin, Springer, 2020. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-39462-2.
49. Pollitt M. G. The Future of Electricity (and Gas) Regulation in a Low-Carbon Policy World. The Energy Journal, 2008b, vol. 29, no. S2, pp. 63-94.
50. Pollitt M. G. The Role of Policy in Energy Transitions: Lessons from the Energy Liberalisation Era. Energy Policy, 2012, vol. 50(C), pp. 128-137. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.004.
51. Pollitt M. G., Anaya K. L. Can Current Electricity Markets Cope with High Shares of Renewables? A Comparison of Approaches in Germany, the UK and the State of New York. The Energy Journal, 2016, vol. 37, Bollino-Madlener Special Issue, pp. 69-88.
52. Reverdy T. Managing Uncertain Reform Through “Flexible Institutions”: Electricity Sector Liberalization in France, 2015. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01174295/.
53. Sioshansi F. P., Pfaffenberger W. Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2006.
54. Stoft S. Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-IEEE Press, 2002.
55. Sweeney J. L. California Electricity Crisis. Stanford, CA, Hoover Press, 2002.
56. Taylor N. W., Jones P. H., Kipp M. J. Targeting Utility Customers to Improve Energy Savings from Conservation and Efficiency Programs. Applied Energy, 2014, vol. 115(C), pp. 25-36. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.012.
57. Triebs T. P., Pollitt M. G. Objectives and Incentives: Evidence from the Privatization of Great Britain’s Power Plants. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2019, vol. 65(C), pp. 1-29. DOI:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.12.003.
58. Urpelainen J., Yang J. Global Patterns of Power Sector Reform, 1982-2013. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2019, vol. 23, pp. 152-162. DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2018.12.001.
59. Urpelainen J., Yang J. Power Sector Reform Tracker (PSRT), 2018. DOI:10.7910/DVN/M7SY6X.
60. Vagliasindi M., Besant-Jones J. Power Market Structure: Revisiting Policy Options. Washington, DC, The World Bank, 2013.
61. Verzijlbergh R. A., De Vries L. J., Dijkem G. P. J., Herder P. M. Institutional Challenges Caused by the Integration of Renewable Energy Sources in the European Electricity Sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, vol. 75(C), pp. 660-667. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.039.
62. Viljainen S., Makkonen M., Gore O., Spodniak P. Risks in Small Electricity Markets: The Experience of Finland in Winter 2012. The Electricity Journal, 2012, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 71-80. DOI:10.1016/j.tej.2012.11.003.
63. White M. W., Joskow P. L., Hausman J. Power Struggles: Explaining Deregulatory Reforms in Electricity Markets. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1996, vol. 1996, pp. 201-267. DOI:10.2307/2534749.
64. Wilson R. Architecture of Power Markets. Econometrica, 2002, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1299-1340. DOI:10.1111/1468-0262.00334.
65. Wolak F. A. Diagnosing the California Electricity Crisis. The Electricity Journal, 2003, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 11-37. DOI:10.1016/S1040-6190(03)00099-X.
66. Woo C. K., Lloyd D., Tishler A. Electricity Market Reform Failures: UK, Norway, Alberta and California. Energy Policy, 2003, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1103-1115. DOI:10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00211-2.
67. Zhang Y., Parker D., Kirkpatrick C. Competition, Regulation and Privatisation of Electricity Generation in Developing Countries: Does the Sequencing of the Reforms Matter? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 2005, vol. 45, no. 2-3, pp. 358-379. DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2004.12.
Review
For citations:
Vymyatnina Yu.V., Karaseva E.N., Sloev I.А. Electricity Sector Reform Experience in the Context of Economic Theory. Economic Policy. 2022;17(3):8-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-3-8-43
Views:
144
Email this article 