Theory and Practice of ESG Transformation of Management Systems
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2023-2-80-103
Аннотация
The paper explores different approaches to defining the concepts of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) and sustainable development and substantiates the position that ESG transformation of management systems is the ideological embodiment of a comprehensive solution to economic, social, and environmental problems facing the state, business, and society. In this regard, it is advisable to view the seventeen UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) through the prism of a set of specific mechanisms to ensure that their achievement is based on ESG ideology. In essence, ESG ideology integrates the triunity of economic, environmental, and social principles inherent in all SDGs, and is a tool for verifying the feasibility of the specific mechanisms that are developed and implemented to achieve each of these goals. Applying an interdisciplinary approach, which is preferable for research of sustainable development issues and assessment of key factors for ESG transformation of management systems, the authors reveal manageable and unmanageable risks, define trends for skill development in managers capable of its implementation, and identify the nuances of achieving sustainable development goals through increased efficiency of interaction between government, business, and society. Specific examples demonstrate that while good practices of the influence of developed civil society institutions on SDG achievement exist, its role is still underestimated, which is a significant hindrance to the achievement of a balance between meeting the objectively existing needs of the population and ensuring no harm to future generations. Research results can be used by the professional community interested in promoting the ESG agenda and achieving sustainable development goals based on ESG transformation of public and corporate management systems.
Ключевые слова
ESG risks,
ESG transformation of management systems,
ESG factors,
sustainable development,
sustainable development goals
JEL: O13, O15, O38, O44, Q01
Об авторах
Rae Kwon Chung
The Global Energy Prize; Ban Ki-Moon Foundation for a Better Future; The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Южная Корея
Южная Корея
Rae Kwon Chung, Chairman, International Award Committee; Recipeint of personal copy of the Nobel Peace Prize 2007 awarded to the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); Board Director; Professor Emeritus and the Chief scientific adviser of the Institute of Finance and Sustainable Development; Honorary Doctor, Moscow State University,
F5, 33 Gyeonghuigung-gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03176.
Andrey M. Margolin
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Россия
Россия
Andrey M. Margolin, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Director of the Institute of Finance and Sustainable Development, Vice-Rector,
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571.
Scopus AuthorID: 57205301323.
Irina V. Vyakina
Tver State Technical University
Россия
Россия
Irina V. Vyakina, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Department of Economics and Production Management,
22, nab. Afanasiya Nikitina, Tver, 170026.
ivyakina@yahoo.com
ResearcherID: G-6146-2016;
Scopus AuthorID: 56711983200.
Список литературы
1. Antonova M.V., Shumkov D.A. Criteria for Evaluating a Company’s ESG Risks in the Context of Sustainable Development. Bulletin of the Belgorod University of Cooperation, 2022, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 125-132. https://doi.org/10.21295/2223-5639-2022-1-125-132. (In Russ.)
2. Barrero J. M., Bloom N., Davis S. J. Why Working From Home Will Stick. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2021, no. 28731. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731.
3. Boulding K. E. General Systems Theory - The Skeleton of Science. Management Science, 1956, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 197-208.
4. Bowen H. R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Brothers, 1953. https:// books.google.ru/books?id=4y0vAAAAMAAJ.
5. Chelukhina N. F. Financial Aspects of ESG Risks. Financial Economics, 2022, no. 1, pp. 150153. (In Russ.)
6. Chipurenko E.V., Lisitskaya T.V. The Problem of Assessing ESG Risks Completely Changes the Format of Corporate Reporting. Finance, 2021, vol. 11, pp. 51-56. (In Russ.)
7. Cornelis M. Energy Efficiency, the Overlooked Climate Emergency Solution. Economic Policy, 2020, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 48-67. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-2-48-67.
8. Delios A., Perchthold G., Capri A. Cohesion, COVID-19 and Contemporary Challenges to Globalization. Journal of World Business, 2021, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 101197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101197.
9. Dragomir V. D. How Do We Measure Corporate Environmental Performance? A Critical Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, vol. 196, pp. 1124-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.014.
10. Emelyanova E. S., Vasilev L. A. Approbation of Approaches to Assessing the ESG Risks of Russian Companies at the Regional Level. Federalism, 2021, vol. 26, no. 2(102), pp. 25-42. https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-2-25-42. (In Russ.)
11. Escoto X., Gebrehewot D., Morris K. C. Refocusing the Barriers to Sustainability for Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, vol. 338, pp. 130589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130589.
12. Fatemi A., Glaum M., Kaiser S. ESG Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 2018, vol. 38, pp. 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001.
13. George G., Haas M. R., McGahan A. M., Schillebeeckx S. J. D., Tracey P. Purpose in the ForProfit Firm: A Review And Framework For Management Research, Journal of Management, 2021, рр. 01492063211006450. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006450.
14. George G., Schillebeeckx S.J.D. Digital Transformation, Sustainability, and Purpose in the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of World Business, 2022, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101326.
15. Kamalirezaei H., Rostamy A. A. A., Saeedi A., Zaghard M. K. V. Corporate Social Responsibility and Bankruptcy Probability: Exploring the Role of Market Competition, Intellectual Capital, and Equity Cost. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 2020, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22417.
16. Kundurpi A., Westman L., Luederitz C., Burch S., Mercado A. Navigating Between Adaptation and Transformation: How Intermediaries Support Businesses in Sustainability Transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, vol. 283, pp. 125366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125366.
17. Labidi C., Laribi D., Ureche-Rangau L. National Culture and Socially Responsible Fund Flows. Emerging Markets Review, 2021, vol. 46, pp. 100751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100751.
18. Lubinski C., Wadhwani R. D. Geopolitical Jockeying: Economic Nationalism and Multinational Strategy in Historical Perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 2020, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 400-421. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3022.
19. Martins A., Branco M. C., Melo P. N., Machado C. Sustainability in Small and MediumSized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 6493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116493.
20. Mau V. A. The Economy of the Unpredictable: Towards a New Paradigm. Education Policy, 2020, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 8-12. (In Russ.).
21. Murphy P. E. Corporate Social Responsiveness: An Evolution. University of Michigan Business Review, 1978, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 19-25. https://www.econbiz.de/Record/corporate-social-responsiveness-an-evolution-murphy-patrick/10002552613.
22. Olanipekun A. O., Omotayo T., Saka N. Review of the Use of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Tools. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, vol. 27, pp. 425-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.012.
23. Rahdari A. H., Rostamy A. A. A. Designing a General Set of Sustainability Indicators at the Corporate Level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, vol. 108, part A, pp. 757-771. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.108.
24. Schillebeeckx S. J. D., Kautonen T., Hakala H. To Buy Green or Not to Buy Green: Do Structural Dependencies Block Ecological Responsiveness? Journal of Management, 2022, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 472-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320977896.
25. Singh K., Misra M. Linking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Organizational Performance: The Moderating Effect of Corporate Reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 2021, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2020.100139.
26. Smirnov V. D. ESG Risk Management in Commercial Organizations. Management Sciences, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 6-20. https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2020-10-3-6-20. (In Russ.)
27. Sun P., DohJ. P., Rajwani Т., Siegel D. Navigating Cross-Border Institutional Complexity: A Review and Assessment of Multinational Nonmarket Strategy Research. Journal of International Business Studies, 2021, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1818-1853. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00438-x.
28. Vereshchagin V. V., Shemyakina T. Yu. Problems of Integrating the Sustainability Risk Management Business Process Into the Company’s Corporate Governance. Problems in Risk Analysis, 2021, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 66-76. https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2021-18-3-6676. (In Russ.)
29. Wang K. T., Kartika F., Wang W. W., Luo G. Corporate Social Responsibility, Investor Protection, and the Cost of Equity: Evidence From East Asia. Emerging Markets Review, 2021, vol. 47, pp. 100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100801.
30. Ye M., Wang H., Lu W. Opening the “Black Box” Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: From a Critical Review on Moderators and Mediators to an Integrated Framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, vol. 313, pp. 127919. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127919.
31. Zattoni A., Pugliese A. Corporate Governance Research in the Wake of a Systemic Crisis: Lessons and Opportunities From the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Management Studies, 2021, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1405-1410. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12693.
32. Zenkina I.V. Regulatory Risks of ESG Integration on the Sustainable Development of Energy Companies. National Interests: Priorities and Security, 2021, vol. 17, no. 4(397), pp. 624-648. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.17.4.624. (In Russ.)
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Chung R., Margolin A.M., Vyakina I.V. Theory and Practice of ESG Transformation of Management Systems. Экономическая политика. 2023;18(2):80-103. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2023-2-80-103
For citation:
Chung R., Margolin A.M., Vyakina I.V. Theory and Practice of ESG Transformation of Management Systems. Economic Policy. 2023;18(2):80-103. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2023-2-80-103
Просмотров:
161
Послать статью по эл. почте 