Income Residential Demand Elasticities for Electricity: Do We Need to Differentiate the Tariff?
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-4-110-137
Abstract
This study assesses how the Russian household welfare rate impacts electricity consumption volume. Modeling of Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS) data provided by the Higher School of Economics (HSE) has revealed a heterogeneous dependency between average per capita family income and electricity consumption volume. Electricity demand is not elastic among both urban and countryside residents. However, urban consumption is better described by a linear function, while rural consumption is better described by a quadratic function. The electricity tariff is not statistically significant for urban residents, whereas the price elasticity of electricity consumption for rural residents is close to 1. Application of lifeline rates for electricity tariffs in certain regions did not affect the level of elasticity of consumption by income, but some anomalies have been identified that indicate forced savings of electricity in order to pay for it at a minimum price. The study provides a divided quantitative assessment of influence of some non-income determinants on electricity demand among urban and countryside residents: number and age of family members, residential property area etc. The conclusion deems increasing block tariffs unreasonable because higher electricity tariffs may affect low-income groups thus raising the national poverty rate. If the cross subsidization problem in Russia is nevertheless addressed by imposing increasing block tariffs, the number of blocks and, respectively, prices must be more than two, while threshold consumption volumes should be estimated taking into account non-income determinants on different levels for different social groups.
Keywords
cross-subsidies,
income residential demand elasticities,
electricity,
increasing block tariffs,
lifeline rate
JEL: D12, L94
About the Author
K. A. Tumanyants
Volgograd State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Karen A. Tumanyants, Cand. Sci. (Econ.).
References
1. Zaytseva Yu. V. Ekonometricheskoe modelirovanie potrebleniya elektroenergii domokhozyaystvami kak instrument rascheta sotsial’noy normy potrebleniya [Econometric Modeling of Electricity Consumption by Households as a Tool for the Calculation of Social Norms of Consumption]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2016, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 405-416.
2. Kukoverov M. V. O tsenovoy elastichnosti sprosa na elektroenergiyu [On Price Elasticity of Electricity Demand]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii [Journal of the New Economic Association], 2019, no. 2(42), pp. 70-92.
3. Mishura A. V. Otsenka elastichnosti sprosa na elektroenergiyu so storony naseleniya v Rossii [Estimation of Households’ Electricity Demand Elasticity in Russia]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki [Vestnik NSU. Series: Social and Economic Sciences], 2011, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 92-101.
4. Tumanyants K. A., Intykbayeva S. Zh., Tumanyants A. K. Ekonomika vysokogo napryazheniya [High Voltage Economy]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Ekonomika. Ekologiya [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global Economic System], 2019a, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 166-176.
5. Tumanyants K.A., Zaytseva Yu. V. Vliyanie sotsial’noy normy potrebleniya elektroenergii na ob’em potrebleniya i platezhnuyu distsiplinu naseleniya [The Impact of Increasing Block Tariff (“Social Norm”) of Electricity Consumption on the Volume of Consumption and Payment Discipline]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Economic Journal], 2019, no. 1(53), pp. 51-64.
6. Tumanyants K. A., Tumanyants A. K., Tumanyants D. K. Social’naya norma potrebleniya elektroenergii: v poiskakh optimal’noy konstruktsii [Social Norm of Electricity Consumption: In Search of Optimal Design]. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2019b, no. 3, pp. 48-65.
7. Asad A., Murthi M., Yemtsov R., Murrugarra E., Dudwick N., Hamilton E., Tiongson E. Growth, Poverty, and Inequality: Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. World Bank Publications, no. 7287, 2005.
8. Atakhanova Z., Howie P. Electricity Demand in Kazakhstan. Energy Policy, 2007, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 3729-3743.
9. Borenstein S. The Redistributional Impact of Nonlinear Electricity Pricing. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2012, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 56-90.
10. Dergiades T., Tsoulfidis L. Estimating Residential Demand for Electricity in the United States, 1965-2006. Energy Economics, 2008, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2722-2730.
11. Feldstein M. S. Equity and Efficiency in Public Sector Pricing: The Optimal Two-Part Tariff. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1972, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 175-187.
12. Freund C., Wallich C. Public-Sector Price Reforms in Transition Economies: Who Gains? Who Loses? The Case of Household Energy Prices in Poland. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1997, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 35-59.
13. Gupta S., Verhoeven M., Gillingham R., Schiller C., Mansoor A., Cordoba J. P. Equity and Efficiency in the Reform of Price Subsidies: A Guide for Policymakers. Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund, 2000.
14. Hara K., Uwasu M., Kishita Y., Takeda H. Determinant Factors of Residential Consumption and Perception of Energy Conservation: Time-Series Analysis by Large-Scale Questionnaire in Suita, Japan. Energy Policy, 2015, vol. 87(C), pp. 240-249.
15. Hennessy M. The Evaluation of Lifeline Electricity Rates: Methods and Myths. Evaluation Review, 1984, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 327-346.
16. Herriges J. A., King K. K. Residential Demand for Electricity Under Inverted Block Rates: Evidence from a Controlled Experiment. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1994, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 419-430.
17. Kamerschen D. R., Porter D. V. The Demand for Residential, Industrial and Total Electricity, 1973-1998. Energy Economics, 2004, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 87-100.
18. Khanna N. Z., Guo J., Zheng X. Y. Effects of Demand Side Management on Chinese Household Electricity Consumption: Empirical Findings from Chinese Household Survey. Energy Policy, 2016, vol. 95(C), pp. 113-125.
19. Kojima M., Bacon R., Trimble Ch. Political Economy of Power Sector Subsidies: A Review with Reference to Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC, World Bank, 2014. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/19986/895470REPLACEM0ies0for0Web0posting.pdf;sequence=1.
20. Komives K., Foster V., Halpern J., Wodon Q. Water, Electricity, and the Poor. Who Benefits from Utility Subsidies? Washington, DC, World Bank, 2005. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/606521468136796984/Water-electricity-and-the-poor-who-benefits-fromutility-subsidies.
21. Liao H., Cao H. S. The Pattern of Electricity Use in Residential Sector: The Experiences from 133 Economies. Energy, 2018, vol. 145(C), pp. 515-525.
22. Lin Q., Rizov M., Wong M. Residential Electricity Pricing in China. The Chinese Economy, 2014, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 41-74.
23. Medlock III K. B., Soligo R. Economic Development and End-Use Energy Demand. The Energy Journal, 2001, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 77-105.
24. Olivier A., Ruggeri Laderchi C. Analyzing the Incidence of Consumer Price Subsidies and the Impact of Reform on Households Quantitative Analysis: Households. Energy Subsidy Reform Assessment Framework (ESRAF) Good Practice Noteno. 3. Washington, DC, World Bank Group, 2018. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/250011530882467380/Analyzing-the-Incidence-of-Consumer-Price-Subsidies-and-the-Impact-of-Reform-onHouseholds-Quantitative-Analysis-Households.
25. Silva P., Klytchnikova I., Radevic D. Poverty and Environmental Impacts of Electricity Price Reforms in Montenegro. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no. 4127, 2007.
26. Silva S., Soares I., Pinho C. Electricity Residential Demand Elasticities: Urban Versus Rural Areas in Portugal. Energy, 2018, no. 144(C), pp. 627-632.
27. Tilov I., Farsi M., Volland B. From Frugal Jane to Wasteful John: A Quantile Regression Analysis of Swiss Households’ Electricity Demand. Energy Policy, 2020, vol. 138. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421520300082.
28. Wang Z. H., Zhang B., Zhang Y. X. Determinants of Public Acceptance of Tiered Electricity Price Reform in China: Evidence from Four Urban Cities. Applied Energy, 2012, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 235-244.
29. Ye Y., Koch S. F., Zhang J. Determinants of Household Electricity Consumption in South Africa. Energy Economics, 2018, no. 75(C), pp. 120-133.
30. Yin H. T., Zhou H., Zhu K. Long and Short-Run Elasticities of Residential Electricity Consumption in China: A Partial Adjustment Model with Panel Data. Applied Economics, 2016, vol. 48, no. 28, pp. 2587-2599.
31. Zhang S. S., Lin B. Q. Impact of Tiered Pricing System on China’s Urban Residential Electricity Consumption: Survey Evidences from 14 Cities in Guangxi Province. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, vol. 170, pp. 1404-1412.
Review
For citations:
Tumanyants K.A. Income Residential Demand Elasticities for Electricity: Do We Need to Differentiate the Tariff? Economic Policy. 2020;15(4):110-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-4-110-137
Views:
37
JATS XML
Email this article 