Digitalization of Tax Administration in Russia: Opportunities and Risks
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-2-8-33
Abstract
An active policy of digitalization of the tax administration system in Russia is carried out with special attention to the automation of calculation and payment of taxes. The article summarizes the domestic experience in this area, analyzes the features of tax legislation and regulation under which these reforms are implemented, and identifies relevant trends and their prospects. The results of the analysis make it possible to identify the opportunities and risks of development of the Russian tax system in the context of its digitalization. Further automation of certain taxes (first of all, corporate and personal income taxes) will be associated with the need to overcome a large number of legal imprecisions, whereas simplifying the design of taxes, in many cases, leads to economic distortions. The digital innovations that have already been introduced are intended for small or large legal entities, thereby creating a significant bias in the complexity of tax regulation for other taxpayers. The article concludes that it is advisable to use the tool of preliminary filling and verification of tax returns by tax authorities as a direction for improving the system of tax administration in Russia. The transition to providing taxpayers with motivated opinions of the tax authorities (tax rulings) on certain types of economic transactions is promising as well. The authors also recommend implementing measures aimed at disclosing information about transactions that have signs of aggressive tax planning, according to the recommendations of the OECD. It is noted that the existing mechanisms for resolving tax disputes and legal standards for the protection of taxpayers’ rights will require transformation under increased transparency of business transactions for tax authorities.
About the Authors
S. G. Sinelnikov-MurylevRussian Federation
Sergey G. Sinelnikov-Murylev, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Rector
6A, Vorobiyovskoe shosse, Moscow, 119285
N. S. Milogolov
Russian Federation
Nikolai S. Milogolov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Tax Policy Research Laboratory; Leading Researcher, Tax Policy Center
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571
2, Nastasyinsky per., Moscow, 127006
A. B. Berberov
Russian Federation
Azamat B. Berberov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher, Tax Policy Research Laboratory
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571
References
1. Vashkevich A.M. Avtomatizatsiya prava: pravo kak elektrichestvo [Automation of Law: Law as Electricity]. Moscow, Simplawyer, 2019. (In Russ.)
2. Makhinya E.A. Printsip zakrytogo perechnya (numerus clause) veshhnykh prav i ego realizatsiya v sovremennom zakonodatel’stve i pravoprimenitel’noy deyatel’nosti [The Principle of the Closed List (Numerus Clause) of Corporeal Rights and Its Implementation in Modern Legislation and Law Enforcement Actiwity]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences], 2015, no. 4(30), pp. 52-59. (In Russ.)
3. Borshchevskiy G. A., Mossaki N. Z. Development of the Tax Administration in Russia: Results and Prospects. Journal of Tax Reform, 2021, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 114-133. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2021.7.2.093.
4. Campbell D. F. J., Hanschitz G. Digitalization of Tax: Epistemic Tax Policy. In: Carayan4. nis E. G., Campbell D. F. J., Efthymiopoulos M. P. (eds.).Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense. Cham, Springer International, 2018, pp. 1-12. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_30-1.
5. Carton B., Corugedo E. F., Hunt M. B. L. Corporate Tax Reform: From Income to Cash Flow Taxes. IMF Working Paper, WP/19/13, 2019.
6. Cordes J. J., Holen A. Should the Government Prepare Individual Income Tax Returns? 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1687256. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1687256.
7. Doxey M. M., Lawson J. G., Stinson S. R. The Effects of Prefilled Tax Returns on Taxpayer Compliance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 2021, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 63-85. DOI:10.2308/JATA-18-055.
8. Frey C. B., Osborne M. A. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, vol. 114, pp. 254-280. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.
9. Jacobs B. Digitalization and Taxation. In: Gupta S., Keen M., Shah A., Verdier G. (eds.). Digital Revolutions in Public Finance. Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund, 2017, ch. 2, pp. 25-55.
10. Klun M. Pre-Filled Income Tax Returns: Reducing Compliance Costs for Personal Income Taxpayers in Slovenia. Financial Theory and Practice, 2009, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 219-233.
11. Pantazatou K. Taxation of the Platform Economy: Challenges and Lessons for Social Security. In: Becker U., Chesalina O. (eds.). Social Law 4.0: New Approaches for Ensuring and Financing Social Security in the Digital Age. Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2021, ch. 14, pp. 363-393. DOI:10.5771/9783748912002-363.
12. Smith W. H. Automation in Tax Administration. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1969, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 751-768.
13. Traversa E. Corporate Tax Residence and Mobility. Amsterdam, IBFD, 2018.
Review
For citations:
Sinelnikov-Murylev S.G., Milogolov N.S., Berberov A.B. Digitalization of Tax Administration in Russia: Opportunities and Risks. Economic Policy. 2022;17(2):8-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-2-8-33