Preview

Economic Policy

Advanced search

Digitalization of Tax Administration in Russia: Opportunities and Risks

https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-2-8-33

Abstract

An  active  policy  of  digitalization  of  the  tax  administration  system  in  Russia  is  carried  out  with special  attention  to  the  automation  of  calculation  and  payment  of  taxes.  The  article  summarizes the domestic experience in this area, analyzes the features of tax legislation and regulation under which  these  reforms  are  implemented,  and  identifies  relevant  trends  and  their  prospects.  The results  of  the  analysis  make  it  possible  to  identify  the  opportunities  and  risks  of  development  of the Russian tax system in the context of its digitalization. Further automation of certain taxes (first of all, corporate and personal income taxes) will be associated with the need to overcome a large number  of  legal  imprecisions,  whereas  simplifying  the  design  of  taxes,  in  many  cases,  leads  to economic  distortions.  The  digital  innovations  that  have  already  been  introduced  are  intended  for small or large legal entities, thereby creating a significant bias in the complexity of tax regulation for other taxpayers. The article concludes that it is advisable to use the tool of preliminary filling and  verification  of  tax  returns  by  tax  authorities  as  a  direction  for  improving  the  system  of  tax administration in Russia. The transition to providing taxpayers with motivated opinions of the tax authorities (tax rulings) on certain types of economic transactions is promising as well. The authors also recommend implementing measures aimed at disclosing information about transactions that have signs of aggressive tax planning, according to the recommendations of the OECD. It is noted that the existing mechanisms for resolving tax disputes and legal standards for the protection of taxpayers’ rights will require transformation under increased transparency of business transactions for tax authorities.

About the Authors

S. G. Sinelnikov-Murylev
Russian Foreign Trade Academy
Russian Federation

Sergey G. Sinelnikov-Murylev, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Rector

6A, Vorobiyovskoe shosse, Moscow, 119285



N. S. Milogolov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Nikolai S. Milogolov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Head of the Tax Policy Research Laboratory; Leading Researcher, Tax Policy Center

82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571

2, Nastasyinsky per., Moscow, 127006



A. B. Berberov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Azamat B. Berberov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher, Tax Policy Research Laboratory

82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571



References

1. Vashkevich A.M. Avtomatizatsiya prava: pravo kak elektrichestvo [Automation of Law: Law as Electricity]. Moscow, Simplawyer, 2019. (In Russ.)

2. Makhinya E.A. Printsip zakrytogo perechnya (numerus clause) veshhnykh prav i ego realizatsiya v sovremennom zakonodatel’stve i pravoprimenitel’noy deyatel’nosti [The Principle of the Closed List (Numerus Clause) of Corporeal Rights and Its Implementation in Modern Legislation and Law Enforcement Actiwity]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki [Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences], 2015, no. 4(30), pp. 52-59. (In Russ.)

3. Borshchevskiy G. A., Mossaki N. Z. Development of the Tax Administration in Russia: Results and Prospects. Journal of Tax Reform, 2021, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 114-133. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2021.7.2.093.

4. Campbell D. F. J., Hanschitz G. Digitalization of Tax: Epistemic Tax Policy. In: Carayan4. nis E. G., Campbell D. F. J., Efthymiopoulos M. P. (eds.).Handbook of Cyber-Development, Cyber-Democracy, and Cyber-Defense. Cham, Springer International, 2018, pp. 1-12. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-06091-0_30-1.

5. Carton B., Corugedo E. F., Hunt M. B. L. Corporate Tax Reform: From Income to Cash Flow Taxes. IMF Working Paper, WP/19/13, 2019.

6. Cordes J. J., Holen A. Should the Government Prepare Individual Income Tax Returns? 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1687256. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1687256.

7. Doxey M. M., Lawson J. G., Stinson S. R. The Effects of Prefilled Tax Returns on Taxpayer Compliance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 2021, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 63-85. DOI:10.2308/JATA-18-055.

8. Frey C. B., Osborne M. A. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, vol. 114, pp. 254-280. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.

9. Jacobs B. Digitalization and Taxation. In: Gupta S., Keen M., Shah A., Verdier G. (eds.). Digital Revolutions in Public Finance. Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund, 2017, ch. 2, pp. 25-55.

10. Klun M. Pre-Filled Income Tax Returns: Reducing Compliance Costs for Personal Income Taxpayers in Slovenia. Financial Theory and Practice, 2009, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 219-233.

11. Pantazatou K. Taxation of the Platform Economy: Challenges and Lessons for Social Security. In: Becker U., Chesalina O. (eds.). Social Law 4.0: New Approaches for Ensuring and Financing Social Security in the Digital Age. Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2021, ch. 14, pp. 363-393. DOI:10.5771/9783748912002-363.

12. Smith W. H. Automation in Tax Administration. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1969, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 751-768.

13. Traversa E. Corporate Tax Residence and Mobility. Amsterdam, IBFD, 2018.


Review

For citations:


Sinelnikov-Murylev S.G., Milogolov N.S., Berberov A.B. Digitalization of Tax Administration in Russia: Opportunities and Risks. Economic Policy. 2022;17(2):8-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-2-8-33

Views: 217


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-5124 (Print)
ISSN 2411-2658 (Online)