Multilateral Convention: Potential Issues of Legal Uncertainty
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-1-38-55
Abstract
On October 1, 2019, the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting entered into force with respect to the Russian Federation. The main purpose of the MLI is to establish minimum standards for combating international tax avoidance. The MLI will extend the key approaches of the BEPS plan at once to a large number of bilateral double tax treaties. The application of the MLI is expected from January 1, 2021 in relation to a number of tax treaties concluded by the Russian Federation. At the same time, certain provisions of the MLI leave some questions about their application and may cause new problems for the taxpayers and tax authorities. In the short term, the application of a number of MLI provisions may be expected to increase uncertainty in international tax planning and lead to an increase in the number of disputes over tax treaties. The main purpose of this article is to analyze the key provisions of the MLI and identify possible problems of their enforcement for the subsequent analysis of potential ways to overcome the legal uncertainty of the application of the MLI. To this end, the tasks were set to study the goal of adopting the MLI, and analyze the content and procedure for the application of the MLI, as well as the content of the key standard of the MLI—the principal purpose test. Identifying the problems of law enforcement before the start of active use of the MLI is important, since it would allow one to pay attention to possible problems at an earlier stage and quickly move to their resolution, which would contribute to the formation of a higher level of legal certainty in the field of international tax planning and further development of foreign economic cooperation.
Keywords
JEL: K34, H20, H26, E62
About the Author
D. Ya. PodshivalovaRussian Federation
Daria Ya. Podshivalova
76, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454
References
1. Milogolov N. S., Berberov A. B. Predlozheniya OESR po razvitiyu mekhanizma vzaimosoglasitel’noy protsedury i ego sostoyanie v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [OECD Proposals Concerning the Development of the Mutual Agreement Procedure Mechanism and Its State in the Russian Federation]. Nalogi [Taxes], 2018, no. 1, pp. 42-46.
2. Khavanova I. A. Mezhdunarodnye nalogovye dogovory: novaya mnogostoronnyaya real’nost’ [International Tax Treaties: A New Multifaced Reality]. Finansovoe pravo [Financial Law], 2018, no. 6, pp. 28-30.
3. Khavanova I. A. Nalogovye soglasheniya Rossii [Russian Tax Treaties]. Ekonomiko-pravovoy byulleten’ [Economic and Legal Bulletin], 2013, no. 9. pp. 7-159.
4. Khavanova I. A. Printsip osnovnoy tseli: novelly mezhdunarodnykh nalogovykh pravil [Basic Goal Principle: Novels of the International Taxation Rules]. Finansovoe pravo [Financial Law], 2019, no. 7, pp. 40-43.
5. Shepenko R. A. Mezhdunarodnye nalogovye pravila. Ch. 1 [International Tax Rules. Part 1]. Moscow, Yurlitinform, 2012.
6. Bravo N. The Multilateral Tax Instrument and Its Relationship with Tax Treaties. World Tax Journal, 2016, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 279-304.
7. Broe L. D., Luts J. BEPS Action 6: Tax Treaty Abuse. Intertax, 2015, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 122-146.
8. Chand V. The Principal Purpose Test in the Multilateral Convention: An In-Depth Analysis. Intertax, 2018, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 18-44.
9. Danon R. J. Treaty Abuse in the Post-BEPS World: Analysis of the Policy Shift and Impact of the Principal Purpose Test for MNE Groups. Bulletin for International Taxation, 2018, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 31-55.
10. Duff D. G. Tax Treaty Abuse and the Principal Purpose Test - Part 1. Canadian Tax Journal, 2018a, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 619-677.
11. Duff D. G. Tax Treaty Abuse and the Principal Purpose Test - Part 2. Canadian Tax Journal, 2018b, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 947-1011.
12. Kok R. The Principal Purpose Test in Tax Treaties Under BEPS 6. Intertax, 2016, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 406-412.
13. Lang М. BEPS Action 6: Introducing an Antiabuse Rule in Tax Treaties. Tax Notes International, 2014, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 655-664.
14. Weber D. The Reasonableness Test of the Principal Purpose Test Rule in OECD BEPS Action 6 (Tax Treaty Abuse) Versus the EU Principle of Legal Certainty and the EU Abuse of Law Case Law. Erasmus Law Review, 2017, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 48-59.
Review
For citations:
Podshivalova D.Ya. Multilateral Convention: Potential Issues of Legal Uncertainty. Economic Policy. 2021;16(1):38-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-1-38-55