Revealing the Peculiarities of Pricing Using Data on Online Retailers in Moscow
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-5-62-75
Abstract
In this study, using online data on prices of retailers in Moscow, we analyzed the correspondence of price behavior to certain pricing models. The present study complements previous estimates of price rigidity in the context of identifying empirical signs of certain pricing models based on Russian data. The empirical analysis is based on data about Moscow online retailers collected on a daily basis from February 2019 to June 2020. The data cover 33 food categories, 54 nonfood categories and seven service categories. The work obtained the following empirical results, which, with some degree of convention, may be inherent in the Russian economy as a whole. The work did not reveal an explicit dependence of the size of the price change on the duration of the period of price unchanged. The GolosovLuсas model turned out to be the closest in terms of coincidence of stylized factors for Moscow online retailers in the studied time period, but no complete coincidence was found. Pricing behavior of Russian retailers refers to hybrid pricing models which include pricing elements that depend both on the state of the economy and on time. Decomposition of inflation into intensive (average size of price changes) and extensive (the share of goods whose prices have changed in a given period) components indicates a significant contribution of the intensive component to the price dynamics based on Russian data. A similar result is typical for inflation dispersion in which the contribution of the intensive component to the dispersion decomposition turns out to be the highest. The results obtained are not fully stable in relation to the period under consideration and can be adjusted as the sample expands.
About the Authors
A. V. BOZHECHKOVARussian Federation
Alexandra V. BOZHECHKOVA, Cand. Sci. (Econ.)
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571
3–5, Gazetnyy per., 125009, Moscow
A. S. EVSEEV
Russian Federation
Alexey S. EVSEEV
82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571
References
1. Bozhechkova А., Evseev А. Analiz zhestkosti tsen v roznichnoy onlayntorgovle Moskvy [Price Rigidity Analysis: Evidence from the ECommerce Market]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2020, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 3259. DOI:10.18288/19945124202053259. (In Russ.)
2. Calvo G. Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework // Journal of Monetary Economics. 1983. Vol. 12. No 3. P. 383–398.
3. Caplin A., Leahy J. State-Dependent Pricing and the Dynamics of Money and Output // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1991. Vol. 106. No 3. P. 683–708.
4. Caplin A., Spulber D. Menu Costs and the Neutrality of Money // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1987. Vol. 102. No 4. P. 703–725.
5. Dotsey M., King R. G., Wolman A. L. State-Dependent Pricing and the General Equilibrium Dynamics of Money and Output // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1999. Vol. 114. No 2. P. 655–690.
6. Gagnon E. Price Setting During Low and High Inflation: Evidence from Mexico // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2009. Vol. 124. No 3. P. 1221–1263.
7. Golosov M., Lucas Jr. R. E. Menu Costs and Phillips Curves // Journal of Political Economy. 2007. Vol. 115. No 2. P. 171–199.
8. Klenow P., Kryvtsov O. State-Dependent or Time-Dependent Pricing: Does It Matter for Recent U.S. Inflation? // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2008. Vol. 123. No 3. P. 863–904.
9. Nakamura E., Steinsson J. Five Facts About Prices: A Reevaluation of Menu Cost Models // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2008. Vol. 123. No 4. P. 1415–1464.
10. Taylor J. Aggregate Dynamics and Staggered Contracts // Journal of Political Economy. 1980. Vol. 88. No 1. P. 1–23.
Review
For citations:
BOZHECHKOVA A.V., EVSEEV A.S. Revealing the Peculiarities of Pricing Using Data on Online Retailers in Moscow. Economic Policy. 2021;16(5):62–75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2021-5-62-75