Digitalization and the Economies of Scale in Russian NPOs
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-1-34-63
Abstract
Economies of scale, or the reduction of the average costs as a result of the organization’s growth, can be observed not only in for-profit but also in non-profit organizations. Non-profit organizations have certain characteristics that can influence their decisions on expanding their scale of services. Numerous studies point at the presence of economies of scale in NPOs. Today, economies of scale are changing under the influence of digital technologies. Researchers in Russia who study economies of scale, first of all, analyze their effect on various spheres of the economy, and also show the possibilities of their application. Economies of scale and the impact of digitalization on this effect in Russian NPOs have not yet been investigated enough. This article intends to fill in these gaps. For the analysis, data from the Monitoring the Status of Civil Society research conducted by the Centre for Studies of Civil Society and the Nonprofit Sector (HSE) in 2017 and 2018 were used. The analysis elucidates the widespread use of digital technologies by non-profit organizations. The results of the logarithmic model evaluation with the least squares method and robust regression method show that there are significant economies of scale in NPOs. There are no connections between economies of scale and digitalization in NPOs. The author did not obtain any evidence of the existence of economies of learning—i.e., the reduction of the average costs as a result of gaining experience in providing services over time—in Russian NPOs. The results emphasize the importance of supporting small non-profit organizations and assisting non-profit organizations in the process of mastering digital technologies.
Keywords
costs,
economies of learning,
non-profit organizations,
digital technologies,
information technologies
JEL: L25, L31, O33
About the Author
A. V. Philippova
HSE Universitya
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna V. Philippova, Junior Researcher, Centre for Studies of Civil Society and the Nonprofit Sector
20, Myasnitskaya ul., Moscow, 101000
References
1. Gataullin R. F., Askarov A. A., Khuzhakhmetova G. N., Yarkov N. V. Organizatsionnoekonomicheskie formy i effektivnye metody gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya sel’skogo khozyaystva [Organizational and Economic Forms and Effective Methods of State Regulation of Agriculture]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2015, no. 2, pp. 271-284. DOI:10.17059/2015-2-22. (In Russ.)
2. Gurvich E., Khazanov A. Zanyatost’ v rossiyskom byudzhetnom sektore: znachimy sotsial’nye ili ekonomicheskie faktory? [Public Employment in Russia: Do Social Security or Economic Factors Matter?]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2016, vol. 8, pp. 28-56. DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2016-8-28-56. (In Russ.)
3. Deryugin A. N., Proka K. A. Uchet effekta masshtaba v metodikakh raspredeleniya vyravnivayushchikh dotatsiy [Scale Effect Consideration in the Methodologies of Equalization Grants Distribution]. Finansovyy zhurnal [Financial Journal], 2017, no. 4, pp. 98-112. (In Russ.)
4. Kuznetsova O. P., Kuzmenko A. A., Yumaev E. A. Sotruentsiya i sotkurentsiya v sfere turizma v regionakh Sibiri [Co-Opetition (Coexisting Competition and Competitive Coexistence) in the Tourism Field in Siberian Regions]. Ekonomika regiona [Economy of Region], 2017, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 237-248. DOI:10.17059/2017–1-22. (In Russ.)
5. Melnikova L. V. Udalennaya malaya ekonomika: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i empiricheskie nablyudeniya [A Small Remote Economy: Theoretical Framework and Empirical Observations]. Novye issledovaniia Tuvy [The New Research of Tuva], 2019, no. 3, pp. 89-101. DOI:10.25178/nit.2019.3.8. (In Russ.)
6. Polishchuk L., Shchetinin O., Shestoperov O. Posredniki mezhdu chastnym sektorom i gosudarstvom: sodeystvie biznesu ili souchastie v korruptsii? [Intermediaries Between Private Sector and the Government: Helping Business or Participating in Corruption?]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2008, no. 3, pp. 106-123. DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2008-3-106-123. (In Russ.)
7. Rusanovskiy V., Markov V., Brovkova A. Modelirovanie effekta prostranstvennoy lokalizatsii v gorodskikh aglomeratsiyakh Rossii [Modeling the Effects of Spatial Localization in Urban Agglomerations of Russia]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2018, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 136-163. DOI:10.18288/1994-5124-2018-6-136-163. (In Russ.)
8. Andersen R. Modern Methods for Robust Regression. SAGE Publications. Series “Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences”, vol. 152, 2007.
9. Armsworth P. R., Cantú-Salazar L., Parnell M., Davies Z. G., Stoneman R. Management Costs for Small Protected Areas and Economies of Scale in Habitat Conservation. Biological Conservation, 2011, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 423-429. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.026.
10. Bovaird T. Efficiency in Third Sector Partnerships for Delivering Local Government Services: The Role of Economies of Scale, Scope and Learning. Public Management Review, 2014, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1067-1090. DOI:10.1080/14719037.2014.930508.
11. Bril A., Kalinina O., Valebnikova O., Valebnikova N., Camastral M., Shustov D., Ostrovskaya N. Improving Personnel Management by Organizational Projects: Implications for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2021, vol. 7, no. 2. DOI:10.3390/joitmc7020105.
12. Chandler A. D., Jr. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. L., Harvard University Press, 1994.
13. Dranove D. Economies of Scale in Non-Revenue Producing Cost Centers: Implications for Hospital Mergers. Journal of Health Economics, 1998, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 69-83. DOI:10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00013-1.
14. Ecer S., Magro M., Sarpça S. The Relationship Between Nonprofits’ Revenue Composition and Their Economic-Financial Efficiency. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2017, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 141-155. DOI:10.1177/0899764016649693.
15. Einav L., Farronato C., Levin J. Peer-to-Peer Markets. Annual Review of Economics, 2016, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 615-635. DOI:10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334.
16. Filippini M. Economies of Scale in the Swiss Nursing Home Industry. Applied Economics Letters, 2001, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43-46. DOI:10.1080/135048501750041277.
17. Firsova A., Chernyshova G. Efficiency Analysis of Regional Innovation Development Based on DEA Malmquist Index. Information, 2020, vol. 11(6), no. 294. DOI:10.3390/info11060294.
18. Galárraga O., Wamai R. G., Sosa-Rubí S. G., Mugo M. G., Contreras-Loya D., BautistaArredondo S., Nyakundi H., Wang’ombe J. K. HIV Prevention Costs and Their Predictors: Evidence from the ORPHEA Project in Kenya. Health Policy and Planning, 2017, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1407-1416. DOI:10.1093/heapol/czx121.
19. Golikova V., Kuznetsov B. Suboptimal Size: Factors Preventing the Growth of Russian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Foresight and STI Governance, 2017, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 83-93. DOI:10.17323/2500-2597.2017.3.83.93.
20. Hair J. F., Black W. C., Babin B. J., Anderson R. E. Multivariate Data Analysis. L., Pearson, 2013.
21. Hansmann H. B. The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 1980, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 835-901. DOI:10.2307/796089.
22. Hartarska V., Shen X., Mersland R. Scale Economies and Input Price Elasticities in Microfinance Institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 118-131. DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.004.
23. Huber P. J. Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1964, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 73-101. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_35.
24. Ivlev V. J., Ponkratov V. V., Maramygin M. S., Kuznetsov N. V., Pakhomov A. A., Elyakova I. D. The Effectiveness of Creating a Common Energy Market in the Eurasian Economic Union. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 2020, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 155-166. DOI:10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-2.12.
25. Jann B. ROBREG10: Stata Module Providing Robust Regression Estimators. Boston College Department of Economics, 2010. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457114.html.
26. Jarrahi M. H., Eshraghi A. Digital Natives vs. Digital Immigrants: A Multidimensional View on Interaction with Social Technologies in Organizations. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2019, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1051-1070. DOI:10.1108/JEIM-04-2018-0071.
27. Kingma B. R. Public Good Theories of the Non-Profit Sector: Weisbrod Revisited. Voluntas, 1997, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 135-148. DOI:10.1007/BF02354191.
28. Lépine A., Vassall A., Chandrashekar S., Blanc E., Le Nestour A. Estimating Unbiased Economies of Scale of HIV Prevention Projects: A Case Study of Avahan. Social Science & Medicine, 2015, vol. 131(C), pp. 164-172. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.007. 2
29. Makarov I. A. Accelerated Development of the Russian Far East: A View Through the New International Trade Theory and New Economic Geography. Russia in Global Affairs, 2018, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 110-129. DOI:10.31278/1810-6374-2018-16-3-110-129.
30. Marseille E., Dandona L., Marshall N., Gaist P., Bautista-Arredondo S., Rollins B., Bertozzi S. M., Coovadia J., Saba J., Lioznov D., Du Plessis J.-A., Krupitsky E., Stanley N., Over M., Peryshkina A., Kumar S. P., Muyingo S., Pitter C., Lundberg M., Kahn J. G. HIV Prevention Costs and Program Scale: Data from the PANCEA Project in Five Low and Middle-Income Countries. BMC Health Services Research, 2007, vol. 7, no. 108. DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-7-108.
31. Martin S. Globalization and the Natural Limits of Competition. In: Neumann M., Weigand J. (eds.). The International Handbook of Competition. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013, pp. 4-56. DOI:10.4337/9781849802680.00006.
32. Menke T. J. The Effect of Chain Membership on Hospital Costs. Health Services Research, 1997, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 177-196.
33. Mourão P., Enes C. Costs and Economies of Scale at Not-for-Profit Organizations: The Case of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Barcelos Between 2002 and 2013. Social Indicators Research, 2017, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 821-840. DOI:10.1007/s11205-016-1315-4.
34. Oster S. M. Product Diversification and Commercial Ventures. In: Seaman B. A., Young D.R. (eds.). Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics and Management. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 269-284. DOI:10.4337/9781785363528.00021.
35. Porter M. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. N. Y., NY, The Free Press, 1985.
36. Rose-Ackerman S. Altruism, Nonprofits, and Economic Theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 1996, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 701-728.
37. Rousseeuw P., Yohai V. Robust Regression by Means of S-Estimators. In: Franke J., Härdle W., Martin D. (eds.). Robust and Nonlinear Time Series Analysis. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 26. N. Y., NY: Springer, 1984, pp. 256-272. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4615-7821-5_15.
38. Salamon L. M. Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure, and Third-Party Government: Toward a Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1987, vol. 16, no. 1-2, pp. 29-49.
39. Salamon L. M., Anheier H. K. The Third World’s Third Sector in Comparative Perspective. Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, no. 24, 1997.
40. Sigarev A. V., Kosov M. E., Buzdalina O. B., Alandarov R. A., Rykova I. N. The Role of Chains in the Russian Retail Sector. European Research Studies Journal, 2018, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 542-554.
41. Tsyrenov D. D., Munkueva I. S., Dondokova E. B., Sharaldayev B. B., Goryunova L. A. Statistical Research on Spatial Differentiation of the Innovation System of the Russian Federation. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 2015, vol. 10, no. 6(36), pp. 914-922.
42. Vance-McMullen D. Using Contract Consolidation to Improve Performance: Effects of Service Delivery Scale on Nonprofit Provider Efficiency in the Combined Federal Campaign. Public Performance & Management Review, 2020, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1209-1235. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2020.1752267.
43. Vodanovich S., Sundaram D., Myers M. Digital Natives and Ubiquitous Information System. Information System Research, 2010, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 711-723. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0324.
44. Wicker P., Breuer C., Lamprecht M., Fischer A. Does Club Size Matter: An Examination of Economies of Scale, Economies of Scope, and Organizational Problems. Journal of Sport Management, 2014, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 266-280. DOI:10.1123/jsm.2013-0051.
45. Yohai V. J. High Breakdown-Point and High Efficiency Robust Estimates for Regression. The Annals of Statistics, 1987, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 642-656. DOI:10.1214/aos/1176350366.
46. Young D. R., Faulk L. Franchises and Federations: The Economics of Multi-Site Nonprofit Organizations. In: Seaman B. A., Young D. R. (eds.). Handbook of Research on Nonprofit Economics and Management. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018, pp. 300-322. DOI:10.4337/9781785363528.00023.
Review
For citations:
Philippova A.V. Digitalization and the Economies of Scale in Russian NPOs. Economic Policy. 2022;17(1):34-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2022-1-34-63
Views:
114
Email this article 