Preview

Экономическая политика

Расширенный поиск

Institutional Perspectives on the Productive Use of Resources

https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-2-8-17

Аннотация

There is increasing evidence that climate change is a growing social and economic burden. Moreover, the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are at risk of falling short of their intended targets. The difficulties will only be made worse as the climate and economic burdens grow. A growing literature suggests that the problems largely stem from the non-productive use of resources which erode our social and economic well-being—especially over the long haul. These huge inefficiencies include the non-productive use of capital, materials, water, food, and especially energy. One assessment notes that, depending on how we ignore global ecosystems or, more hopefully, how we might build up a more healthy and resilient environmental capacity, “the global value of ecosystem services can decline by $51 trillion/yr or increase by $30 trillion/yr” by the year 2040 (with values in 2007 dollars). At the same time, moving to a smarter and more productive use of all resources requires a larger number of institutional changes. Such changes range from the use of new metrics to assess future opportunities to an array of policies and perspectives that promote these changes. In this special issue we review a number of different ways that institutional changes might create opportunities in which all resources might be managed more productively. While no single special issue can cover all elements of the necessary institutional changes, nor can even a series of books on the topic, this is another step forward to open up thinking more along the lines of human and cultural dimensions toward a better understanding of how resources might be more productively used for social and economic benefits.

Об авторе

J. Laitner
Institute for Applied Economic Research, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Economic and Human Dimensions Research Associates
Соединённые Штаты Америки

John A. “Skip” Laitner

82, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation

5751 North Kolb Road, Unit 23203, Tucson, AZ 85750, USA



Список литературы

1. Aiken C., Keller S. The Irrational Side of Change Management. McKinsey Quarterly, April 2009.

2. Barinova V., Laitner J. A. Examining the Critical Role of Institutions and Innovations in Shaping Productive Energy Policy for Russia. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 54-66.

3. Berdin V. K., Kokorin A. O., Potashnikov V. Y., Yulkin G. M. Renewable Energy Development in Russia: Potential Capacities and Practical Steps. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 106-135.

4. Brody M., Eshchanov B., Golub A. Approaches to Optimize Uzbekistan’s Investment in Irrigation Technologies. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 136-147.

5. Browne J. B., Villarreal D., Lackner K. S., Brennan S. Incentivizing a Carbon-Free Economy: A Method to Identify Free-Riders. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 68-85.

6. Cornelis M. Energy Efficiency, the Overlooked Climate Emergency Solution. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 48-67.

7. Deming W. E. The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 1994.

8. Dobbs R., Oppenheim J., Thompson F., Brinkman M., Zornes M. Resource Revolution: Meeting the World’s Energy, Materials, Food, and Water Needs. McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey Sustainability and Resource Productivity Practice, 2011.

9. Dunlop T. Mind the Gap: A Social Sciences Review of Energy Efficiency. Energy Research & Social Science, 2019, vol. 56.

10. Ehrhardt-Martinez K., Laitner J. A. Dollars or Sense: Economic Versus Social Rationality in Residential Energy Consumption. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 2008, pp. 82-97.

11. Ekins P., Hughes N. Resource Efficiency: Potential and Economic Implications. A Report of the International Resource Panel of the United Nations Environment Programme, 2017. https://www.resourcepanel.org/sites/default/files/documents/document/media/resource_efficiency_report_march_2017_web_res.pdf.

12. Huntington H., Weyant J., Sweeney J. Modeling for Insights, Not Numbers: The Experiences of the Energy Modeling Forum. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 1982, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 449-462.

13. Kubiszewski I., Costanza R., Anderson S., Sutton P. The Future Value of Ecosystem Services: Global Scenarios and National Implications. Ecosystem Services, 2017, vol. 26, part A, pp. 289-301.

14. Laitner J. A., Lugovoy O., Potashnikov V. Cost and Benefits of Deep Decarbonization in Russia: A Thought Experiment. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 86-105.

15. Lebot B., Weiland M. Policies and Programs Critical for Greater Energy Efficiency. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 148-167.

16. Reed J. H., Dion J. P. Accelerating Sustainability: Integrating Context, Behavior, Technology, and Culture in Organizations, 2018. https://theresourceimperative.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Accelerating-Sustainability-Context-Behavior-Culture-Technology-06062018-Final.pdf.

17. Ripple W. J., Wolf C., Newsome T. M., Barnard P., Moomaw W. R. World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency. BioScience, 2019, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 8-12.

18. Sachs J., Schmidt-Traub G., Kroll C., Lafortune G., Fuller G. Sustainable Development Report 2019. N. Y., Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2019.

19. Stern D. I. The Environmental Kuznets Curve after 25 Years. Journal of Bioeconomics, 2017, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7-28.

20. Von Baeyer H. C. The Fermi Solution: Essays on Science. N. Y., Random House, 1993.

21. Zemtsov S., Barinova V., Kidiaeva V., Lanshina T. Ecological Efficiency and Sustainable Regional Development in Russia During the 20 Years of Resource-Based Growth. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2020, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 18-47.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Laitner J. Institutional Perspectives on the Productive Use of Resources. Экономическая политика. 2020;15(2):8-17. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-2-8-17

For citation:


Laitner J. Institutional Perspectives on the Productive Use of Resources. Economic Policy. 2020;15(2):8-17. https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-2-8-17

Просмотров: 31

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1994-5124 (Print)
ISSN 2411-2658 (Online)