Industrial Policy in Underdeveloped Regions: Lessons from Mezzogiorno
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-1-136-159
Abstract
Nowadays many countries are trying to solve the problem of regional inequality, and Russia is one of them. Russian policy against underdevelopment of some federal subjects includes special industrial policy for the North Caucasus, the least industrialized part of Russia. This article aims to evaluate the prospects of this policy by comparing it with the measures taken by the Italian government to stimulate economic growth in Mezzogiorno. The findings reveal that Italian authorities at first established anticompetitive industrial policy of “Cassa del Mezzogiorno”, but then changed it to a mixed policy of supporting industrial districts. I show that “Cassa del Mezzogiorno” policy of grants and subsidies for new heavy industry enterprises did not reach its goal of reducing regional inequality, as it distorted the incentives for the local businessmen. At the same time, supporting new industrial districts by creating an infrastructure needed by all the firms inside the district was more effective, even though the effect was significant only for the territories which received this aid. Comparing the current industrial policy in the North Caucasus with Italian examples, one can observe that the activity of the North Caucasus Development Corporation is close to the efforts of “Cassa del Mezzogiorno” and it risks being as inefficient. At the same time, mixed industrial policy such as the Italian one, in my opinion, may be more successful, as some preconditions of industrial district formation may be observed in several localities of the North Caucasus.
Keywords
JEL: L52, O25, R58.
About the Author
D. A. SitkevichRussian Federation
Daniil A. Sitkevich,
3–5, Gazetnyy per., Moscow, 125009;
1–46, Leninskie Gory, GSP-1, Moscow, 119991.
References
1. Starodubrovskaya I. V. Severnyy Kavkaz: modernizatsionnyy vyzov [North Caucasus: Modernization Challenge]. Moscow, Delo, 2014.
2. Kha E. R., Eneeva M. Severnomu Kavkazu nuzhny ne den’gi, a institutsional’nye reformy [Noth Caucasus Needs Institutional Reforms, Not Money]. Obshchestvo i ekonomika [Society and Economy], 2010, no. 10-11, pp. 184-199.
3. Bagnasco A. The Governance of Industrial Districts. In: Becattini G., Bellandi M., De Propris L. (eds.). A Handbook of Industrial District. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.
4. Barca F. New Trends and the Policy Shift in the Italian Mezzogiorno. Daedalus, 2001, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 93-113.
5. Baudner J., Bull M. European Policies and Domestic Reform: A Case Study of Structural Fund Management in Italy. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 2005, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 299-314.
6. Bianchi L., Miotti D., Padovani R., Pellegrini G. 150 anni di crescita, 150 anni di divari: sviluppo, trasformazioni, politiche. Rivista Economia del Mezzogiorno, 2011, vol. 25, pp. 449516.
7. Bigoni M., Bortolotti S., Casari M., Gambetta D., Pancotto E. Amoral Familism, Social Capital, or Trust? The Behavioural Foundations of the Italian North-South Divide. The Economic Journal, 2016, vol. 126, no. 594, pp. 1318-1341.
8. Bigoni M., Bortolotti S., Casari M., Gambetta D. At the Root of the North-South Cooperation Gap in Italy: Preferences or Beliefs? The Economic Journal, 2018, vol. 129, no. 618, pp. 1139-1152.
9. Bigoni M., Bortolotti S., Casari M., Gambetta D., Pancotto E. Cooperation Hidden Frontiers: The Behavioral Foundations of the Italian North-South Divide. Università di Bo - logna, Department of Economics, Quaderni DSE Working Paper, no. 882, 2013. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2267266.
10. Boschma R. Culture of “Trust” and Regional Development: Аn Empirical Analysis of Third Italy. 1999. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/114191/1/ERSA1999_a009.pdf
11. Cainelli G., Giannini V., Iacobucci D. Agglomeration, Networking and the Great Recession. Regional Studies, 2018, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1-12.
12. Clark Carey J. P., Carey A. G. The South of Italy and the Cassa per il Mezzogiorno. The Western Political Quarterly, 1955, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 569-588.
13. Cusimano A. La valutazione ex-post dei progetti integrati territoriali: un’analisi econometrica. University of Palermo Institutional Repository, IRIS UniPA, 2014. https://iris.unipa.it/handle/10447/90784.
14. Cusimano A., Barde S., Mazzola F. Selection bias, incentivi alle imprese e sviluppo locale: una valutazione ex-post. Scienze regionali, 2015, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 103-128.
15. Cusimano A., Barde S., Mazzola F. Un’analisi controfattuale degli incentivi agli investimenti infrastrutturali per lo sviluppo locale: il caso dei PIT. In: Le regioni europee. Politiche per la coesione e strategie per la competitività. Milano, FrancoAngeli, 2016, pp. 129-146.
16. Demidova O., Marelli E., Signorelli M. Youth Labour Market Performances in the Russian and Italian Regions. Economic Systems, 2015, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 43-58.
17. Dunford M., Greco L. Geographies of Growth, Decline and Restructuring: Тhe Rise and Fall (Privatization) of the State-Оwned Steel Sector and the Trajectories of Steel Localities in the Italian Mezzogiorno. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2007, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 27-53.
18. Easterly W. The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001.
19. Felice E., Lepore A. State Intervention and Economic Growth in Southern Italy: The Rise and Fall of the “Cassa per il Mezzogiorno” (1950-1986). Business History, 2017, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 319-341.
20. Filippetti A., Guy F., Iammarino S. Does Training Help in Times of Crisis? Training in Employment in Northern and Southern Italy. University of London, Birkbeck College. CIMR Research Working Paper Series, no. 28, 2015. https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/18453/.
21. Guerrieri P., Iammarino S. Dynamics of Export Specialization in the Regions of the Italian Mezzogiorno: Persistence and Change. Regional Studies, 2007, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 933-948.
22. Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development. American Economic Review, 2004, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 526-556.
23. Lagravinese R. Economic Crisis and Rising Gaps North-South: Evidence from the Italian Regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2015, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 331-342.
24. Leonardi R. Regional Development in Italy: Social Capital and the Mezzogiorno. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1995, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 165-179.
25. Martinelli F. Public Policy and Industrial Development in Southern Italy: Anatomy of a Dependent Industry. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1985, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 47-81.
26. Putnam R., Leonardi R., Nanetti R. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1993.
27. Rabellotti R., Carabelli A., Hirsch G. Italian Industrial Districts on the Move: Where Are They Going? European Planning Studies, 2009, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 19-41.
28. Rolfo S., Calabrese G. Traditional SMEs and Innovation: Тhe Role of the Industrial Policy in Italy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2003, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 253-271.
29. Tani P. Flow-Fund Model, Decomposability of the Production Process and the Structure of an Industrial District. In: Becattini G., Bellandi M., De Propris L. (eds.). A Handbook of Industrial Districts. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009.
Review
For citations:
Sitkevich D.A. Industrial Policy in Underdeveloped Regions: Lessons from Mezzogiorno. Economic Policy. 2020;15(1):136-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-1-136-159
JATS XML



















