Problems of Agricultural Policy Adaptation Within Sustainable Development Goals

The paper reveals problems of integrating national policy for increasing agricultural production and ecological consequences, including the important aspect of Russia’s ratification of the Paris Agreement on climate, which provides additional opportunities for a decrease in carbon emissions. Current government programs for agricultural development in Russia, which include but are not limited to production growth and increase in agricultural exports, do not take into account the ecological consequences of such growth. The paper analyzes how the agriculture of Russia has evolved in the recent period (2007–2017) and what amount of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions it has caused. Although in general emissions exhibited a decreasing trend, it was found that ploughing additional land for crop production had caused a large outburst of emissions from a small amount of land. Using the GLOBIOM partial equilibrium model, two scenarios of Russia’s agricultural development until 2030 were formulated. The first one is intensive, with only a small amount of crop area growth but with a 45% increase in yields compared to current levels. The second scenario is an extensive one, with crop area growth of additional 6.4 million hectares and a total yield increase of 24% compared to current levels. Results have shown that crop and meat production increase in both scenarios, but the extensive one involves more emissions from additional ploughed land. To stop these kinds of practices, the recommendations would be to limit the ploughing of additional land and to improve statistical bookkeeping for a more accurate inclusion of land use and respective GHG emissions.

1. Kotlyarova E. G. Аgroekologicheskoe obosnovanie effektivnosti landschaftnykh system zemledeliya v Tsentral’nom Chernozem’e [Agroecological Assessment for Applying Efficient Landscape Management in Central Black Earth Region]. Diss. ... d-ra sel’skokhoz. nauk [Doctoral Thesis for Agricultural Science]. Russian Research Institute of Land Management and Combating Soil Erosion Practices, 2011.

2. Semenov E. A. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i ekologicheskie posledstviya zemledel’cheskogo osvoeniya stepnoy zony v dvadtsatom veke — na primere Orenburgskoy oblasti [Social, Economic, and Ecological Consequences of Transforming Steppe Landscape in the 20th Century: The Case of Orenburg Oblast]. Diss. ... kand. geogr. nauk [Candidate Thesis for Geography Science]. Altay State University. 2007.

3. Skripchinsky A. V., Antonov S. A. Kosmicheskiy monitoring pastbishch vostochnykh rayonov Stavropol’skogo kraya [Space Monitoring of Pastures of the Eastern Regions of the Stavropol Territory]. Nauka. Innovatsii. Technologii [Science. Innovations. Technologies], 2019, no. 2, pp. 125-136.

4. Sychev V. G., Esaulko A. N., Ageev V. V., Podkolzin A. I., Sigida M. S. Osobennosti primeneniya system udobreniy pod sel’skokhozyastvennye kultury v Stavropol’skom krae[Features of Application of Systems of Fertilizers for Agricultural Crops in Stavropol Region]. Vestnik APK Stavropol’ya [Agricultural Bulletin of Stavropol Region], 2015, no. 2, pp. 53-66.

5. Shagaida N. I. Ponuzhdenie k ispol’zovaniyu sel’skokhozyaystvennykh zemel’: vybor prioriteta zemel’noy politiki i kachestvo institutov [Compulsion to Use Agricultural Land: Choosing Priorities of Land Policy and the Quality of Institutes]. Mezghdunarodnyy sel’skokhozyaystvennyy zhurnal [International Agricultural Journal], 2014, no. 5, pp. 18-26.

6. Carlson K., Gerber J., Mueller N., Herrero M., MacDonald G., Brauman K., Havlik P., O’Connel C., Johnson J., Saatchi S., West P. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Intensity of Global Croplands. Nature Climate Change, 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63-68.

7. Carpenter S., Bennett E. Reconsideration of the Planetary Boundary for Phosphorus. Environmental Research Letters, 2011, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9-14.

8. Deppermann A., Balkovič J., Bundle S.-C., Di Fulvio F., Havlik P., Leclère D., Lesiv M., Prishchepov A., Schepaschenko D. Increasing Crop Production in Russia and Ukraine Regional and Global Impacts from Intensification and Recultivation. Environmental Research Letters, 2018, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1-13.

9. Feng H., Kling C., Gassman P. Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs. Iowa State University, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Working Paper, 04-WP 379, 2004.

10. Foley J. A., Ramankutty N., Brauman K. A., Cassidy E. S., Gerber J. S., Johnston M., Mueller N. D., O’Connel C., Ray D. K., West P. C., Balzer C., Bennet E. M., Carpenter S. R., Hill J., Monfreda C., Polasky S., Rockström J., Sheehan J., Siebert S., Tilman D., Zaks D. Solutions for a Cultivated Planet. Nature, 2011, no. 478, pp. 337-342.

11. Havlik P., Valin H., Herrero M., Obersteiner M., Schmid E., Rufino M. C., Mosnier A., Thornton P. K., Böttcher H., Conant R. T., Frank S., Fritz S., Fuss S., Kraxner F., Notenbaert A. Climate Change Mitigation Through Livestock System Transitions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 3709-3714.

12. Jang H., Du X. An Empirical Structural Model of Productivity and Conservation Reserve Program Participation. Land Economics, 2018, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 1-18.

13. Kurganova I., Lopes de Gerenyu V., Kuzyakov Y. Large-Scale Carbon Sequestration in PostAgrogenic Ecosystems in Russia and Kazakhstan. Catena, 2015, no. 133, pp. 461-466.

14. Kurganova I., Lopes de Gerenyu V., Six J., Kuzyakov Y. Carbon Cost of Collective Farming Collapse in Russia. Global Change Biology, 2014, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 938-947.

15. Matson P., Vitousek P. Agricultural Intensification: Will Land Spared from Farming Be Land Spared for Nature? Conservation Biology, 2006, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709-710.

16. Meyfroidt P., Schierhorn F., Prishchepov A., Müller D., Kuemmerle T. Drivers, Constraints and Trade-Offs Associated with Recultivating Abandoned Cropland in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Global Environmental Change, 2016, vol. 37, pp. 1-15.

17. Newbold T., Hudson L., Arnell A., Contu S., De Palma A., Ferrier S., Hill S. L. L., Hoskins A. J., Lysenko I., Phillips H. R. P., Burton V. J., Chng C. W. T., Emerson S., Gao D., Pask-Hale G., Hutton J., Jung M., Sanchez-Ortiz K., Simmons B. I., Whitmee S., Zhang H., Scharlemann J. P. W., Purvis A. Has Land Use Pushed Terrestrial Biodiversity Beyond the Planetary Boundary? A Global Assessment. Science, 2016, no. 353, pp. 288-291.

18. Obersteiner M., Walsh B., Frank S., Havlik P., Cantele M., Liu J., Palazzo A., Herrero M., Lu Y., Mosnier A., Valin H., Riahi K., Kraxner F., Fritz S., van Vuuren D. Assessing the Land Resource-Food Price Nexus of the Sustainable Development Goals. Science Advances, 2016, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 45-50.

19. Romanovskaya A. A., Korotkov V. N., Polumieva P. D., Trunov A. A. Greenhouse Gas Fluxes and Mitigation Potential for Managed Lands in the Russian Federation. Mitigation Adaptation Strategies of Global Change, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334727575_Greenhouse_gas_fluxes_and_mitigation_potential_for_managed_lands_in_the_Russian_Federation.

20. Rudel T., Schneider L., Uriarte M., Turner B. L., DeFries R., Lawrence D., Geoghegan J.,

21. Hecht S., Ickowitz A., Lambin E. F., Birkenholtz T., Baptista S., Grau R. Agricultural Intensification and Changes in Cultivated Areas, 1970-2005. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, no. 106(49), pp. 20675-20680.

22. Schierhorn F., Kastner T., Kuemmerle T., Meyfroidt P., Kurganova I., Prishchepov A., Erb K.-H., Houghton R., Müller D. Large Greenhouse Gas Savings Due to Changes in the Post-Soviet Food Systems. Environmental Research Letters, 2019, vol. 14, no. 065009.

23. Smith P., Martino D., Cai Z., Gwary D, Janzen H., Kumar P., McCarl B., Ogle S., O’Mara F., Rice C., Scholes B., Sirotenko O., Howden M., McAllister T., Pan G., Romanenkov V., Schneider U., Towprayoon S., Wattenbach M., Smith J. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 2008, vol. 363, pp. 789-813.

24. Steffen W., Richardson K., Rockström J., Cornell S. E., Fetzer I., Bennett E. M., Biggs R., Carpenter S. R., Vries W., de Wit C. A., Folke C., Gerten D., Heinke J., Mace G. M., Persson L. M., Ramanthan V., Reyers B., Sorlin S. Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science, 2015, vol. 347, no. 6223, pp. 735-746.

25. Svetlov N. M. Land Use Projections for Southern Non-Black-Earth Regions of Russia: Coping with Uncertainty. IAMO Forum 2017: Eurasian Food Economy Between Globalization and Geopolitics, 21-23 June 2017, Halle (Saale), Germany, 2018. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3240669.

26. Waggoner P. How Much Land Can Ten Billion People Spare for Nature? Does Technology Make a Difference? Technological Society, 1995, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 17-34.

27. Waggoner P., Ausubel J. How Much Will Feeding More and Wealthier People Enсroach on Forests? Population and Development Review, 2001, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 239-257.