Impact of New Technologies on the Labor Market: Past Lessons and New Challenges
https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-4-62-87
Abstract
The article is devoted to the review of theoretical and applied studies on the impact of technological progress on the labor market and public policy. Firstly, the influence of previous industrial revolutions is considered. It is shown that new technologies during the last two centuries have been resulting in growth of employment and reduction of working hours. In addition, mass computerization observed in the past few decades has led to polarization of the labor market. Secondly, the concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is analyzed. It is pointed out that, despite active discussion of this topic in the mass media and in the expert community, so far the results of the former have been limited and the latest technologies related to it are poorly distributed even in the most developed countries. However, studies devoted to quantitative estimates of automation and labor substitution have a highly controversial methodology. As a result, the majority of alarmist predictions are deemed unfounded. Various studies have indicated that the more likely response to the new technological revolution is not an increase in unemployment, but rather a spread of non-standard employment. Finally, changes in government labor market policy due to technological innovations of recent years are investigated. Despite the persistent intentions to reform the fundamental labor market policies, European employment services continue to apply a standard set of practices. The data available for Russia indicate that the risks of automation and significant changes on the labor market are even lower than in developed countries.
Keywords
technological advances,
labor market,
technological unemployment,
working time,
labor market policy,
labor market polarization
JEL: E24, J20, J46
About the Authors
V. Yu. Lyashok
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Victor Yu. Lyashok, Cand. Sci. (Econ.). Institute for Social Analysis and Forecasting
T. M. Maleva
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana M. Maleva, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), DBA. Institute for Social Analysis and Forecasting
M. V. lopatina
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina V. lopatina. Institute for Social Analysis and Forecasting
References
1. Denisenko M. B., Varshavskaya E. Ya. Prodolzhitel’nost’ trudovoy zhizni v Rossii [Working Life Expectancy in Russia]. HSE Economic Journal, 2017, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 592-622.
2. Gimpelson V. E., Kapeliushnikov R. I. «Polyarizatsiya» ili «uluchshenie»? Evolyutsiya struktury rabochikh mest v Rossii v 2000-e gody [Polarization or Upgrading? Evolution of Employment in Transitional Russia]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2015, no. 7, pp. 87-119.
3. Zemtsov S. Roboty i potentsial’naya tekhnologicheskaya bezrabotitsa v regionakh Rossii: opyt izucheniya i predvaritel’nye otsenki [Robots and Potential Technological Unemployment in the Russian Regions: Review and Preliminary Results]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2017, no. 7, pp. 142-157.
4. Iserov A. A. Sotsial’nye protsessy [Social Activities]. In: Chubaryan A. O. (ed.). Vsemirnaya istoriya. T. 5: Mir v XIX veke: na puti k industrial’noy tsivilizatsii [World History. Vol. 5: The World in the 19th Century: On the Way to the Industrial Civilization]. Moscow, Nauka, 2014.
5. Kapeliushnikov R. I. Tekhnologicheskiy progress — pozhiratel’ rabochikh mest? [Is Technological Change a Devourer of Jobs?]. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2017, no. 11, pp. 111-140.
6. Collins R. Sredniy klass bez raboty: vykhody zakryvayutsya [The End of Middle-Class Work: No More Escapes]. In: Derlugyan (ed.). Est’ li budushchee u kapitalizma? [Does Capitalism Have a Future?]. Trans. from Eng. by Apollonova A., Kotelnikova T. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2017, pp. 61-112.
7. Lyashok V. Yu., Lopatina M. V. Gibkost’ zarabotnykh plat v Rossii: chto pokazyvayut mikrodannye? [Wage Flexibility in Russia: Empirical Evidence from Microdata Analysis]. Ekonomicheskaya politika [Economic Policy], 2019, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 96-119.
8. Ricardo D. Nachala politicheskoy ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya [On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Smit M. N. (ed.). Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izd-vo politicheskoy literatury, 1955.
9. Harari Yu. N. 21 urok dlya XXI veka [21 Lessons for the 21st Century]. Moscow, 2019.
10. Acemoglu D., Autor D. Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings. In: Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2011, pp. 1043-1171.
11. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. Journal of Political Economy, 2019, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 2188-2244.
12. Arntz M., Gregory T., Zierahn U. Revisiting the Risk of Automation. Economics Letters, 2017, vol. 159, pp. 157-160.
13. Arntz M., Gregory T., Zierahn U. The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, no. 189, 2016.
14. Aronowitz S., DiFazio W. The Jobless Future: Sci-Tech and the Dogma of Work. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1994.
15. Atkinson R. D., Wu J. J. False Alarmism: Technological Disruption and the U.S. Labor Market, 1850-2015. 2017. https://itif.org/publications/2017/05/08/false-alarmism-technological-disruption-and-us-labor-market-1850-2015.
16. Autor D., Levy F., Murnane R. The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 1279-1333.
17. Balliester T., Elsheikhi A. The Future of Work: A Literature Review. International Labour Organization. Research Department Working Paper, no. 29, 2018.
18. Bruckner M., LaFleur M., Pitterle I. Frontier Issues: The Impact of the Technological Revolution on Labour Markets and Income Distribution. United Nations. Department of Economic & Social Affairs, 2017. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/2017_Aug_Frontier-Issues-1.pdf.
19. Chiacchio F., Petropoulos G., Pichler D. The Impact of Industrial Robots on EU Employment and Wages: A Local Labour Market Approach. Bruegel Working Paper, vol. 2, 2018.
20. Codagnone C., Abadie F., Biagi F. The Future of Work in the “Sharing Economy”. Market Efficiency and Equitable Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation? Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Science for Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre, 2016. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC101280/jrc101280.pdf.
21. Daheim C., Wintermann O. 2050: The Future of Work. Findings of an International Delphi Study of the Millennium Project, 2016. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/BST_Delphi_E_03lay.pdf.
22. Feldstein M. Underestimating the Real Growth of GDP, Personal Income, and Productivity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2017, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 145-164.
23. Frase P. Four Futures: Life After Capitalism. L., Verso Books, 2016.
24. Frey C. B., Osborne M. A. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, vol. 114, pp. 254-280.
25. Gentilini U., Grosh M., Rigolini J., Yemtsov R. Exploring Universal Basic Income: A Guide to Navigating Concepts, Evidence, and Practices. World Bank, 2020. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/993911574784667955/pdf/Exploring-Universal-Basic-IncomeA-Guide-to-Navigating-Concepts-Evidence-and-Practices.pdf.
26. Goos M., Manning A., Salomons A. Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring. American Economic Review, 2014, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 2509 2526.
27. Hijzen A., Schwellnus C. Good Jobs for All in a Changing World of Work: The OECD Jobs Strategy. 2018. http://www.oecd.org/publications/good-jobs-for-all-in-a-changing-worldof-work-9789264308817-en.htm.
28. Hines A. Getting Ready for a Post-Work Future. Forsayt [Foresight and STI Governance], 2019, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19-30.
29. Keister R., Lewandowski P. A Routine Transition? Causes and Consequences of the Changing Content of Jobs in Central and Eastern Europe. IBS Policy Papers, no. 5, 2016.
30. Keynes J. M. Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren. In: Keynes J. M. The Collected Writings, vol. 9: Essays in Persuasion. Cambridge, Royal Economic Society, 1978, pp. 321-332.
31. Manyika J., Chui M., Miremadi M., Bughin J., George K., Willmott P., Dewhurst M. A Future that Works: Automation, Employment, and Productivity. 2017. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/Digital%20Disruption/Harnessing%20automation%20for%20a%20future%20that%20works/MGI-A-future-that-works-Full-report.ashx.
32. Pesole A., Urzí Brancati M. C., Fernández-Macías E., Biagi F., González Vázquez I. Platform Workers in Europe. Joint Research Centre for Policy Report, 2018. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC112157/jrc112157_pubsy_platform_workers_in_europe_science_for_policy.pdf.
33. Philbeck T., Davis N. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Shaping a New Era. Journal of International Affairs, 2019, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 17-22.
34. Psacharopoulos G., Patrinos H. A. Returns to Investment in Education: A Decennial Review of the Global Literature. World Bank Group, Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 8402, 2018.
35. Rifkin J. The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the PostMarket Era. N. Y., G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1995.
36. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. L., Currency, 2017.
37. Voskoboynikov I. Global Slowdown and the Russian Economy. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Monthly Report, no. 2, 2019.
Review
For citations:
Lyashok V.Yu., Maleva T.M., lopatina M.V. Impact of New Technologies on the Labor Market: Past Lessons and New Challenges. Economic Policy. 2020;15(4):62-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2020-4-62-87
Views:
33
JATS XML
Email this article 