An Improved Means-Testing Formula for Better Targeting

In Russia, means testing is used to identify low-income households and measure poverty headcount as well as to establish the eligibility of the applicants to target-ed social assistance. The current means-testing formula, however, is restricted to comparing the per capita income with the cost of the so-called minimum consumer basket or the standard subsistence income. The authors propose an improved means-testing formula which is claimed to measure the wealth and consumption needs of a household more accurately and more equitably, as it includes a revised equivalence scale and а filter for the possession of certain valuable assets. Based on a representative household survey, which covers three subfederal jurisdictions and has been specifically designed to test the performance of the new formula, the authors measure the contribution of each of the proposed formula modifications and the combined effect of all modifications upon the overall poverty headcount and the total income gap as well as the effects upon the poverty status of selected categories of households. Even though during the modeling phase the poverty threshold had to be raised by 12–16% against the official poverty line effective in the respective jurisdictions in order to eliminate the influence of the proposed equivalence scale on the poverty headcount, the ultimate effect of the new formula, which combines the new equivalence scale and several property filters, is a 25% reduction of poverty. This reduction is mainly due to sorting out the households that own excessive property or cars from the low-income category.

1. Aleksandrova A., Gallagher J., Liborakina M., Chagin K. Mezhdunarodnyy opyt organizatsii programm adresnoy sotsial’noy pomoshchi [International Practices of Organizing Programs of Targeted Social Assistance]. Moscow, Institute for Urban Economics Foundation, 2001.

2. Andreeva E., Bychkov D., Grishina E., Yemtsov R., Feoktistova O. Razvitie effektivnoy sotsial’noy podderzhki naseleniya v Rossii: adresnost’, nuzhdaemost’, universal’nost’: nauchnyy doklad [Building an Efficient Social Support System in Russia: Targeting, Neediness, Common Eligibility Criteria: Research Paper]. Moscow, Financial Research Institute, World Bank, 2017. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3068625.

3. Andreeva E., Bychkov D., Feoktistova O. Ob adresnosti byudzhetnykh mer v sfere sotsial’noy podderzhki naseleniya [Targeting Social Support of the Population]. Finansy [Finance], 2015, no. 8, pp. 15-21.

4. Andreeva E., Bychkov D., Feoktistova O. Realizatsiya printsipa adresnosti i nuzhdaemosti v sotsial’noy podderzhke: vozmozhnye podkhody k otsenke blagosostoyaniya domokhozyaystv v Rossii [Implementation of the Principles of Targeting and Neediness in Social Assistance: Approaches to Estimating the Welfare of Households in Russia]. Finansy [Finance], 2015, no. 11, pp. 11-15.

5. Maleva T. A. 2014-2015 gody: ekonomicheskiy krizis - sotsial’noe izmerenie [2014-2015: Economic Crisis - Social Dimension]. Moscow, Delo Publishing House, 2016.

6. Radaev V. Rabotayushchie bednye: velik li zapas prochnosti [The Working Poor: How Wide Is the Safety Margin?]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Journal of Economic Sociology], 2000, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25-36.

7. Banerjee A. V., Duflo E. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. N. Y., NY, Public Affairs, 2012.

8. De Neubourg C., Castonguay J., Roelen K. Social Safety Nets and Targeted Social Assistance: Lessons from the European Experience. World Bank, Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes, no. 41529, 2007.

9. Frick J. R., Grabka M. M., Smeeding T. M., Tsakloglou P. Distributional Effects of Imputed Rents in Five European Countries. Journal of Housing Economics, 2010, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 167-179.

10. Gideon L. (ed.). Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. N. Y., NY, Springer, 2012.