Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and Practice of Measurement Using RLMS-HSE Microdata

This paper measures the opportunity inequality in the Russian Federation using a non-parametric approach. The paper uses data from the 20^th round of the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey — Higher School of Economics, which is a series of annual nation-wide representative surveys. Gender; type of township where the respondent was born; and educational status of the respondent’s parents were used as circumstance factors. The respondent’s income and earnings were chosen as the individual achievements. Calculations were made using two versions of the non-parametric approach: ex-ante, based on the “Min of Means” criterion, and ex-post, based on the “Mean of Mins” criterion. Several inequality indices, including Theil L index, Theil T index, and Atkinson’s A(1) and A(2) indices, were used in order to test the measurement reliability. According to the results obtained by our research team, in Russia, the contribution of opportunity inequality to earnings inequality is 18–24%, depending on the measurement procedure. The contribution of opportunity inequality to income inequality is somewhat less, 12–21%. The estimates obtained using the ex-post approach are higher than those using the ex-ante approach. Given that a limited number of circumstance factors were used in the research, it should be considered that the analysis performed allowed us to estimate the lower bound of the contribution of inequality of opportunities to the inequality of income and earnings in the Russian Federation.

1. Atkinson A. Neravenstvo: kak s nim byt’? [Inequality: What Can Be Done?]. Moscow, Delo, 2018.

2. Ibragimova Z. F., Frants M. V. Neravenstvo vozmozhnostey v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: izmerenie i otsenka na mikrodannykh [Inequality of Opportunity in the Russian Federation: Measurement and Evaluation Using Micro-Data]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 2019, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 5-25.

3. Stiglitz J. Tsena neravenstva: chem rassloenie obshchestva grozit nashemu budushchemu [The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future]. Moscow, Е, 2017.

4. Arneson R. J. Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies, 1989, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 77-93.

5. Arneson R. J. Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1990, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 158-194.

6. Bourguignon F., Ferreira F., Menéndez M. Inequality of Opportunity in Brazil. Review of Income and Wealth, 2007, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 585-618.

7. Checchi D., Peragine V. Inequality of Opportunity in Italy. Journal of Economic Inequality, 2010, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 429-450.

8. Cohen G. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics, 1989, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 906-944.

9. Dworkin R. What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1981a, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 185-246.

10. Dworkin R. What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1981b, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 283-345.

11. Ferreira F., Gignoux J. The Measurement of Inequality of Opportunity: Theory and an Application to Latin America. Review of Income and Wealth, 2011, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 622-657.

12. Fleurbaey M. Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare. N. Y., Oxford University Press, 2008.

13. Hassine N. Inequality of Opportunity in Egypt. The World Bank Economic Review, 2012, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 265-295.

14. Haughton J., Khandker S. Handbook on Poverty and Inequality. Washington, DC, World Bank, 2009.

15. Lucas R. The Industrial Revolution: Past and Future. Economic Education Bulletin, American Institute for Economic Research, 2004, vol. XLIV, no. 8, pp. 1-8.

16. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1971.

17. Rawls J. Justice as Fairness. The Philosophical Review, 1958, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 164-194.

18. Roemer J. E. A Pragmatic Theory of Responsibility for the Egalitarian Planner. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1993, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 146-166.

19. Roemer J. Equality of Opportunity. Cambrige, MA, Harvard University Press, 1998.

20. Shaheen S., Awan M. S., Cheema A. R. Measuring Inequality of Opportunity in Pakistan: Parametric and Non-Parametric Analysis. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 2016, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 165-190.

21. Singh A. The Effect of Family Background on Individual Wages and an Examination of Inequality of Opportunity in India. Journal of Labor Research, 2010, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 230-246.

22. Tawney R. Equality. L., Allen and Unwin, 1964.

23. Van de Gaer D. Equality of Opportunity and Investment in Human Capital. PhD Dissertation. Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, 1993.